On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 09:39:29AM -0600, -Hammer- wrote:
> OK. Right off the bat you know I can't and won't.
Right. I know you can't and won't. I can't either. So we can
summarily dismiss all the concerns about liability because they
have no relationship to reality. You will not be suing Bi
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 08:30:46AM -0800, Jonathan Lassoff wrote:
> > As I said, it's not a pf problem. ?Commercial firewalls will do all this
> > sort of thing off the shelf. ?It's a pain to have to write scripts to do
> > this manually.
>
> Agreed. This is rather a pain to have to do manually ea
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 08:52:22AM -0600, -Hammer- wrote:
> The other high cost of "free" that people sometimes overlook is
> liability.
Please point to an instance (case citation, please) where a commercial
firewall vendor has been successfully litigated against -- that is, held
responsible by a
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 03:32:45PM +0300, Alex Nderitu wrote:
> An important feature lacking for now as far as I know is content/web
> filtering especially for corporates wishing to block
> inappropriate/time wasting content like facebook.
1. That's not a firewall function. That's a censorship f
You will find it very difficult to beat pf on OpenBSD for efficiency,
features, flexibility, robustness, and security. Maintenance is very
easy: edit a configuration file, reload, done.
---rsk
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 08:22:53PM -0400, Chris wrote:
> For folks who say hosting companies are not helpful: Linode, Amazon,
> BurstNET, Ubiquity Servers and others are extremely responsive to
> abuse complaints.
Burstnet is one of the filthiest sewers on the entire Internet. Has been
for many y
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 06:48:54PM +1200, Don Gould wrote:
> OMG can't you people run proper spam filtering on your own mail
> servers that filter out the nanog messages that are spam?!
One of the fundamental principles of spam mitigation is that blocking
is usually best (in terms of: efficacy, ac
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 04:13:10PM +0200, Mattias Ahnberg wrote:
> I might have missed some discussion; but why are we moving
> away from mailman, and what software is in the new system?
Seconded. Mailman is presently the gold standard for mailing list
management [1], and while a lift-and-drop of
8 matches
Mail list logo
