>
> I believe that IOS 12.4.25c is the latest version for the 7200VXR
> series. It's stable, been running it for quite some time. Depending
> on
> what you will be doing with this router, will depend on what feature
> set
> you'll want. I typically use the Service Provider IOS with IPSEC, 3DES
> >
> > The apparent reason for this is that Google will rank links from
> > different /24 higher then links from the same /24. So it's a SEO
> > thingy.
> >
Just in case anyone cares, from personal experience, I can see that Google's
priority is indeed 'rank by content'. Everything else is fluff
>
> Why is is necessary insist that using bits in a fashion that doesn't
> require that growth be predicated on requests for additional resources
> be considered wasteful?
>
Don't we still need to subnet in a reasonably small fashion in order to contain
broadcasts, ill-behaved machines, and oth
> On 2009-07-12-06:09:12, Arie Vayner wrote:
> > Unless you are a major transit operator (which beats the "small ISP"
> > requirement), you don't really need a full view, and can do we a
> > limited view with a default route.
>
> Disagree. Protection against big-provider depeerings,
> interd
>
> In scaling upward. How would a linux router even if a kernel guru were
> to tweak and compile an optimized build, compare to a 7600/RSP720CXL or
> a Juniper PIC in ASIC? At some point packets/sec becomes a limitation I
> would think.
>
Is anyone building linux/bsd-box add-on cards with off
>
> > Mathias Wolkert wrote:
> >> I'd like to know what software people are using to document
> networks.
> >> Visio is obvious but feels like a straight jacket to me.
> >> I liked netviz but it seems owned by CA and unsupported nowadays.
> >> What do you use?
> >
> > OmniGraffle is the better Vis
> i contend that all one's routers should be rigorously
> configured as programmatically as possible.
>
What sort of tools do you use to facilitate this?
Ray.
--
Scanned for viruses and dangerous content at
http://www.oneunified.net and is believed to be clean.
Is there a multiport card out there on to which some of the forwarding
responsibilities can be offloaded? Perhaps the CPU doesn't need to see
every packet that arrives on the machine.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Adrian Chadd
Sent: Wed
> Leo Bicknell wrote:
> >
> > Dual quad-core Xeons in a 1RU form factor. 600W power supply. 600W
> > * 42 = 25,200.
> >
> Supermicro has the "1U Twin" which is 980W for two dual-slot
> machines in 1U form factor;
> http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/1U/6015/SYS-6015TW-TB.cfm
>
> If
9 matches
Mail list logo
