Re: Working with Spamhaus

2015-07-30 Thread Private Sender via NANOG
If you implement SPF / DKIM / DMARC / ADSP, force your customers to relay their mail through something you control, and show them you are serious about stopping the spam they may work with you then. Otherwise, they just assume you're a spam house.

Re: DMARC -> CERT?

2014-04-17 Thread Private Sender
On Wed 16 Apr 2014 09:40:11 PM PDT, Jim Popovitch wrote: > On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 12:19 AM, Private Sender wrote: > >> On 04/14/2014 03:47 PM, Jim Popovitch wrote: >>> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Scott Howard wrote: >>>> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:59 PM,

Re: DMARC -> CERT?

2014-04-16 Thread Private Sender
On 04/14/2014 03:47 PM, Jim Popovitch wrote: > On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 6:21 PM, Scott Howard wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Jim Popovitch wrote: >>> 7-April: Monday, Yahoo's dmarc change kicks everyone in the groin, the >>> last full week before the US tax filing deadline. >> >> The c

Re: spamassassin

2014-02-18 Thread Private Sender
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2/18/2014 7:10 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > DKIM serves to authenticate the source of the message. So this is a stock > tip spam sent through an email service provider called icontact, and the > dkim signature declares that. Just that and

Re: spamassassin

2014-02-18 Thread Private Sender
Randy Bush wrote: in the last 3-4 days, a *massive* amount of spam is making it past spamassassin to my users and to me. see appended for example. not all has dkim. clue? randy From: "SmallCapStockPlays" Subject: Could VIIC be our biggest play in 2014? Check the stock today To: Date: Tue,

Re: Email Server and DNS

2013-11-03 Thread Private Sender
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/3/2013 8:39 AM, rw...@ropeguru.com wrote: > So I figured a little break from the NSA was in order. > > I am looking for some info on current practice for an email server > and SMTP delivery. It has been a while since I have had to setup an > em