I talked to the upstream provider on AS 1500. I called the telephone number on
the abuse record on ARIN and it went to a MSP in India.
On Wednesday, June 12, 2019, 11:06:13 AM PDT, Töma Gavrichenkov
wrote:
Our records show this happened yesterday and lasted before 2019-06-11
20:24:00
wrote:
I would contact upstreams of the upstream then. This is quite a serious offence
and they should help you.
Regards,
Filip
On 12 June 2019 6:20:42 pm GMT+02:00, Philip Lavine
wrote:
yeah I did they are some MSP in India. No help.
On Wednesday, June 12, 2019, 9:15:51 AM PDT, Filip
yeah I did they are some MSP in India. No help.
On Wednesday, June 12, 2019, 9:15:51 AM PDT, Filip Hruska
wrote:
Contact the offending upstreams.
Filip
On 12 June 2019 6:05:58 pm GMT+02:00, Philip Lavine via NANOG
wrote:
What is the procedure to have another party to cease and
What is the procedure to have another party to cease and desist in using my AS
number?
Thx
When is TW in Los Angeles going to support ipv6 prefix delegation? I received a
/128 (even though the advanced tech support said they did not support it).
advice.
-Philip
From: Damian Menscher
To: Philip Lavine
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org"
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 6:05 PM
Subject: Re: google search threshold
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Philip Lavine via NANOG
wrote:
Does anybody know what the threshold for google s
Does anybody know what the threshold for google searches is before you get the
captcha?I am trying to decide if I need to break up the overload NAT to a pool.
-thx
st in a LAB.
On Thursday, June 12, 2014 2:45 PM, Michael Hallgren wrote:
Le 12/06/2014 18:39, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu a écrit :
> On Thu, 12 Jun 2014 09:25:20 -0700, Philip Lavine said:
>> need some guidance on best practices
>
> What the vendor says is best practices,
To all,
I am studying for a certain vendors test, and need some guidance on best
practices. Lets say you have a MPLS VPN with 4 PE routers. Is it more efficient
to use RR or Confederation?
Thank you,
Philip
To all,
I (ASR1001) had an experience recently where the Telco (Juniper) told me that I
was sending them 1000+ routes when I attempted to re-establish a BGP session;
subsequently they would not allow this and they refused the session.
I had no sync on and a prefix list so I was advertising only
I guess as a follow up question. Do you use the EUI-64 address as the Default
gateway or the link local.
On Wednesday, January 29, 2014 2:19 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
rfc 6164
Is it best practice to have the internet facing BGP router's peering ip (or for
that matter any key gateway or security appliance) use a statically configured
address or use EUI-64 auto config?
I have seen comments on both sides and am leaning to EUI-64 (except for the
VIP's like the ASA'
To all,
Has anyone successfully tunneled L2 PDU's (STP, CDP, LLDP) over a L2TPv3
pseudowire tunnel, i.e. should I be able to see CDP neighbors across the
tunnel? For some reason if I encapsulated dot1q on a router sub-interface and
try and pass traffic across the trunk the downstream switch por
rn message
for the wrong issue.
>
>
>
>
>
>>________
>> From: Philip Lavine
>>To: NANOG list
>>Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2013 7:48 AM
>>Subject: BGP from Juniper to Cisco ASR
>>
>>
>
>>Dec 18 07:46:33: %
yes I tried multihop
even though my peer is on the same /29
On Wednesday, December 18, 2013 8:10 AM, Eric Dugas wrote:
Probably a TTL problem. Did you configure ebgp-multihop?
Eric Dugas
ZEROFAIL / AS40191
edu...@zerofail.com
-Original Message-
From: Philip Lavine
Dec 18 07:46:33: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: received from neighbor
active 2/5 (authentication failure) 0 bytes
Dec 18 15:46:33.615: BGP: ses global (0x7FB1CD209CF0:0) act
Receive NOTIFICATION 2/5 (authentication failure) 0 bytes
Although I have seem this on the message boards I am little confused
so : Cradlepoint with 3 x USB Modems -> Cisco2900 with integrated WLC and 6 AP's
From: joel jaeggli
To: Philip Lavine ; NANOG list
Sent: Friday, March 8, 2013 11:40 AM
Subject: Re: internet in the box
cradlepoint, verizon lte wireless usb dong
To all,
I am trying to extend a layer2 connection over Layer 3 so I can have redundant
Layer connectivity between my HQ and colo site. The reason I need this is so I
can give the "appeareance" that there is one gateway and that both data centers
can share the same Layer3 subnet (which I am ann
Who offeres Internet Bandwidth in Fiji Islands (Lautoka and Yaqara)?
achieve?
On Jun 15, 2012 6:04 AM, "Philip Lavine" wrote:
Is there any best practices documentation on how to run BGP multihoming
accross two phyiscally seperated sites.
>
Does this include Multi Site + Multi Homed
From: Chad Gietzen
To: Philip Lavine
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org"
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2012 2:01 PM
Subject: Re: best practives multi-homed BGP 2 physical locations
I found the following helpful, pr
Is there any best practices documentation on how to run BGP multihoming
accross two phyiscally seperated sites.
How do I get a registered multicast block?
Anybody having issues with peering with Level3 in NYC
nail on the head. I need the : notation for the BGP preference. I need
to be able to set a provider as a backup, for example: qwest would be 209:70
From: Stefan Fouant
To: Matthew Petach
Cc: Philip Lavine ; "nanog@nanog.org"
Sent: Frida
does anybody have the community strings for Reliance Globalcom
Can not reach Centurylink/qwest from time Warner.
To all,
Does any one know a Vendor (NOT Keynote) that can do sanity checks against your
web/smtp/ftp farms with pings, traceroutes, latency checks as well as
application checks (GET, POST, ESMTP, etc)
Thank you,
Philip
1. Does anyone know where the Bovespa is located and if colocation is a
possibility at that datacenter/s.
2. What is a good Internet (DS3? or ethernet) carrier in Sao Paolo
thank you
Philip
Not sure if this the the right venue for this, but would anyone happen to know
if there is any changes or "enhancements" in the Windows 2008 64 Bit R2 TCP/IP
stack or in TOE that would cause multicast or microsecond bursts of UDP to be
dropped between the physical layer (NIC) and OS. I am runnin
Thank you Eric you are a genius, that has solved and issue that has plagued me
for 3 years.
the problem was exactly as you said over subscription of the 8 ports tied to 1
ASIC
From: Eric Ortega
To: Philip Lavine
Sent: Wed, October 14, 2009 9:51:43 AM
More info if this helps:
Switch Platform:
4500 SUPII+
with gig line cards
Data rate is <100Mbps
Server OS: Windows 2003 R2 (please withhold snickering).
- Original Message
From: Philip Lavine
To: nanog
Sent: Wed, October 14, 2009 8:19:51 AM
Subject: multicast nightmare
Please explain how this would be possible:
1 sender
1 mcast group
1 receiver
= no data loss
1 sender
1 mcast group
2+ receivers on same VLAN and physical segment
= data loss
Anyone know a good DC on England that caters to financial industry clients?
To all,
I am running a Windows based high performance computing application that uses
"reliable" multicast (29West) on a gigabit LAN. All systems are logically on
the same VLAN and even on the same physical switch The application is set to
use an 8k buffer and therefore results in IP fragmentat
To all,
I am sure this has been asked 10 to the 1 millionth power times, however may be
the rules have changed. I am looking to set up a really small ISP with a few
/24's. I want to host DNS as well. Is there any whitepapers/howtos/best
practices on setting up multihomed BGP and DNS with BIND
Huff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Philip Lavine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; nanog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 8:59:14 AM
Subject: RE: eigrp and managed ethernet
Correct. Eigrp neighbor connectivity has a short-cut when L2 connectivity goes
down, otherwise it will use
For some reason when I lose layer 3 connectivity between two managed Ethernet
sites EIGRP does not bounce.Is this because the physical interface does not
bounce?
anybody no of any issues at 11:00 PST?
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
__
40 matches
Mail list logo
