Jean,The internet is a network like any other (I’m lying, but fundamentally it is).If you advertise your own subnet via two paths then the network can use those two paths to reach your subnet. In the internet that is not so usual as you’d need to pay to own that subnet and an AS. Usually you’ll use
I'd imagine the GPUs would be used to help the control plane only, to
bulk-process several prefix updates?
*Pedro Martins Prado*
pedro.pr...@gmail.com / +353 83 036 1875 (FaceTime & WhatsApp)
On Thu, 5 Dec 2024 at 17:58, wrote:
> This is part of why the old systems that were me
d
> calling the number and it gave an error.
>
Claro acquired Embratel, an operator whose code is 21 - their number is
actually 21212900. Then you add Rio and Brazil and get +55 21 21212900. But I
have no idea about the extra digits…
>
> On Friday, 15/03/2024 at 14:11 Pedro Pr
Hey Scott, I validated those to be correct. They said Dany is the right
contact. Did you try e-mailing him?
Pedro
> On 15 Mar 2024, at 15:45, Scott Q. wrote:
>
> Anyone knows a direct contact for Claro Brazil ?
>
> The phone number for their NOC on PeeringDB doesn't wo
* I am biased, I’m from Arista * but having said that have you guys experienced
Arista TAC? Not propaganda, I truly see it very differently.
As you guys said scale may change things down the road, but at the current
scale it’s still an engineer that answers your call, straight away.
Sent from m
available to
the community and used as a part of a scientific article.
If you have any question, do not hesitate to contact us. Also, if you want
to know more about our project, please visit our website:
https://dynam-ix.github.io
Thank you very much,
--
Pedro Marcos
Federal University of Rio Grande
o improve the survey in the future.
Thank you very much,
2017-06-01 14:23 GMT-03:00 Pedro de Botelho Marcos :
> Dear NANOG community,
>
> We are conducting a survey about Internet agreements, with a focus on
> dynamism, economics, and service level agreements aspects. Can you please
>
ove the survey in the future.
Survey URL: http://bit.ly/2rfoQ3E
Thank you very much,
Cheers,
--
Pedro de Botelho Marcos
PhD Student
Computer Networks Research Group
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS
at dynamic
agreements could solve real-world problems. Has any member of the forum
faced any scenario where the kind of dynamism described above could be
helpful?
Many thanks for your inputs,
--
Pedro de Botelho Marcos
PhD Student
Computer Networks Research Group
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS
acsec is really your only remedy.
On 3/25/2017 07:00 PM, Pedro wrote:
Hello,
Sometimes i have situation that i have to extend my layer2 (access,
trunk mode) network to third parties with limited trust. Sometimes
it's L2 MPLS links from isp (1x or 2x), sometimes it's just colocated
switch.
isable (if cisco)
dtp disable (if cisco)
10.
eventually policer per port or per vlan.
thanks in advance,
Pedro
s for answers,
Pedro
W dniu 2016-09-30 o 22:50, Matt Freitag pisze:
Pedro,
Please also keep in mind that the Juniper EX4500 is an end of life
product. Soon you won't be able to get Juniper to support you. That's
why there are so many for so cheap on eBay.
Matt Freitag
Network Enginee
ct on cpu/whole switch. It
can be some performance degradation ot all of this feature are done in
hardware, with wirespeeed ? Which model will better to do this ?
Thanks for any advice,
Pedro
---
Ta wiadomość została sprawdzona na obecność wirusów przez oprogramowanie
antywirusowe Avast.
On 3 July 2015 at 05:40, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> John Curran gets a quote; NBC gets the etymology of "IPv4" wrong.
>
Statistics/Graphs get misinterpreted; Belgium isn't a country. News at 11.
>
> Just keep them away from Jim Fleming.
>
>
> http://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/internet-now-officia
On 5 May 2015 at 16:22, Matthew Black wrote:
> Pedro Cavaca suggests:
> > https://support.google.com/websearch/answer/873?hl=en
>
> Correct me if I'm wrong, that looks like Google simply saves location data
> in a browser cookie.
>
> "A location helps Google f
https://support.google.com/websearch/answer/873?hl=en
On 7 April 2015 at 23:26, John Levine wrote:
> A friend of mine lives in Alabama and has business service from at&t.
> But Google thinks he's in France. We've checked for various
> possibilities of VPNs and proxies and such, and it's pretty
On 3 April 2015 at 22:53, Matt Palmer wrote:
> Or, to answer your question more simply: "No".
>
That completely mischaracterizes my answer.
>
> - Matt
>
> On Fri, Apr 03, 2015 at 11:39:36AM +0100, Pedro Cavaca wrote:
> > https://support.google.com/websear
https://support.google.com/websearch/answer/86640?hl=en
On 3 April 2015 at 04:53, Randy wrote:
> I've started to get some message today from google claiming that my
> computer or network was sending automated queries, and they are blocking me.
> I'm not sending automated queries, Ive logged all
I'm partial to IRR inverse queries on origin:
'whois -h whois.radb.net -- "-i origin AS" | grep route'
On 7 March 2015 at 20:58, Mansoor Nathani
wrote:
> Perhaps look at http://bgp.he.net
>
> For instance: http://bgp.he.net/AS15169#_prefixes
>
> Mansoor
>
> On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Andre
See
https://support.google.com/mail/answer/81126
which may take you to
https://support.google.com/mail/troubleshooter/2696779
and eventually to
https://support.google.com/mail/contact/bulk_send_new?hl=en&rd=1
HTH.
On 12 February 2015 at 15:41, Alex Rubenstein wrote:
> I should have been c
If your ISP utilizes Juniper platforms, you might have to ask them to allow
the advertisement of these routes, see
http://www.firstdigest.com/2012/09/cisco-vs-juniper-different-ebgp-behavior/
On 28 January 2015 at 09:32, Song Li wrote:
> Hi Joel,
>
> It is right that the BGP route containing the
On 31 October 2014 18:32, Zachary Frederick wrote:
> We have been having a problem receiving software releases from our
> developer. The releases are typically around 1G in size. The developer’s
> connection is a 100m metro fiber with TW Telecom, our connection is a 25m
> Comcast Enterprise Fibe
On 8 March 2014 08:47, Saku Ytti wrote:
> On (2014-03-07 19:44 +), Pedro Cavaca wrote:
>
> > Why wouldn't ".{3}" work, for this case?
>
> Because the OP wants a same atom N times, not any atom N times.
>
Of course, what was I thinking? I'll craw
On 7 March 2014 19:44, Pedro Cavaca wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7 March 2014 19:26, Michael Loftis wrote:
>
>>
>> http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos13.3/topics/usage-guidelines/policy-configuring-as-path-regular-expressions-to-use-as-routing-policy-match-conditions.ht
On 7 March 2014 19:26, Michael Loftis wrote:
>
> http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/en_US/junos13.3/topics/usage-guidelines/policy-configuring-as-path-regular-expressions-to-use-as-routing-policy-match-conditions.html
>
> There's no backref support in the regex subset that juniper has chosen
> to im
On 22 February 2014 01:03, Brian Henson wrote:
> The correct URL should be https://support.google.com/mail/answer/81126
The URL is actually correct, it just happens that the "html" part in
"bulk_mail.html" only shows up on the next line - if you use it, it
eventually redirects to the above.
>
>
On 25 December 2013 00:03, Sam Moats wrote:
> On 2013-12-24 18:55, Jeroen Massar wrote:
>
>> On 2013-12-25 00:16, Sam Moats wrote:
>>
>>> Hello Nanog community,
>>> I would like to enlist your help with understanding this latency I'm
>>> seeing.
>>>
>>
>> You are likely seeing the effects of asym
On 18 December 2013 15:48, Philip Lavine wrote:
> Dec 18 07:46:33: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: received from neighbor
> active 2/5 (authentication failure) 0 bytes
> Dec 18 15:46:33.615: BGP: ses global (0x7FB1CD209CF0:0) act
> Receive NOTIFICATION 2/5 (authentication failure) 0 bytes
>
Although I hav
On 25 November 2013 23:42, David Birdsong wrote:
> On Nov 25, 2013 1:51 PM, "Jason Pope" wrote:
> >
> > --
> > Message: 2
> > Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 18:47:09 -0800
> > From: David Birdsong
> > To: nanog@nanog.org
> > Subject: telnet into a netgear switch?
> > Message
The auth error was transient, forget about it.
Now you're getting 6/1 - maximum number of prefixes reached.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4486
(or
http://backupsalmanaja.blogspot.ie/2009/12/bgp-cease-notification-messages.htmlif
you prefer).
HTH
On 25 November 2013 23:07, Eric A Louie wrote:
Maybe you're not doing anything wrong and someone tweaked the routers and
marked the console as insecure, a previous owner maybe?
http://superuser.com/questions/85536/securing-freebsd-in-single-user-mode
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=boot&sektion=8
HTH.
On 6 November 2013 21:11, Anu
On 3 November 2013 02:59, Bryan Socha wrote:
> I've been searching for a way to submit updates to google for
> incorrect geodatabase information on our ip address assignments.
> does anyone have a contact or know how to do this?
>
>
You might want to look at:
https://support.google.com/websearch
Given your starting conditions, I'd advise the reading of
http://compnetworking.about.com/cs/isps/gr/aapr-cisco_ispe.htm which you
can download a free (2001 ed.) copy of from Cisco at
ftp://ftp-eng.cisco.com/cons/isp/documents/IOSEssentialsPDF.zip.
Probably a little dated and with lots of Cisco sp
>> What's missing? A pretty UI for the users. Apple, Mozilla, W3C,
perhaps this is a good starting point:
http://gpg4usb.cpunk.de/
GPLv3, lightweight, portable, compatibility with GNU/Linux and Windows
34 matches
Mail list logo