On Thu 5. Dec 2019 at 20:38, Töma Gavrichenkov wrote:
> Peace,
On Wed, Dec 4, 2019, 9:26 PM Ishmael Rufus wrote:
> You can start by taking a look at Openflow which embraces the SDN concept.
>
> Please do not
So does anyone still wonder why we have so few women in our field?
Real nice, Töma
> On 27. Oct 2019, at 20:36, Joe Maimon wrote:
>
> Not quite.
>
> 203.0.113.1
> 203.0.113.3
> 203.0.113.5
> 203.0.112.6
> 203.0.112.7
>
> Will aggregate to 203.0.113.0/29 if you dont mind the missing 3 addresses
> in the unaggregated list.
>
> Hence, fuzzy aggregation.
Could you describe th
> On 2. Sep 2019, at 15:49, Valdis Klētnieks wrote:
>
> *plonk* (the sound of an email address dropping into a not-often-used ignore
> file)
mmhmm nice nerd burn. ouchie.
> On 16. Apr 2019, at 00:21, Deepak Jain wrote:
>
> I'm only aware of Sflow being IP/protocol/etc aware.
Actually the sflow standard is flexible, and there are many fields widely
available, including input interface and output interface, vlan/vxlan/mpls
headers, etc. The sending device just n
On 14. Apr 2019, at 13:28, Tony C wrote:
>
> Please keep the suggestions coming.
I’ve had good results using Traffic Sentinel from Inmon. It’s got a nice
queriable database backend and you don’t have to do much manual setup to get
good results. The UI feels a bit 1995, but it works, and the AP
On Mon, 1 Apr 2019 at 18:09, Alfie Pates wrote:
> I feel this comes off as poking fun at trans people, women, and earnest
> attempts to combat what are actual problems in our industry, more than it
> pokes fun at the industry itself which is what a good April Fool should do
> - this feels more li
6 matches
Mail list logo
