Offline contact for MS Windows network stack dev? (Win10 IPv6 bug Q.)

rely because of lack of AOAC support in the driver for IPv6?!], which is clearly not the case). Thanks! -- Nathan Anderson First Step Internet, LLC nath...@fsr.com

RE: iCloud/Apple Mail contact.

Did you ever manage to find out who at Apple to speak to about getting things added to or changed in this database? Quite irritating how there is zero public-facing information about this. Also, an Apple employee authored RFC 6186, yet they don't implement it?? -- Nathan From: NANOG [m

IPv6 on Lumen/CL

We have a circuit on AS209 that was originally provisioned v4-only. I'm now trying to get Lumen to turn v6 up on it. How long does this typically take? I've had a configuration ticket open for nearly 3 biz days now with no movement (or even acknowledgement). For anybody who has gone through

AT&T Wireless contact

This is probably a long shot, but are there any AT&T Wireless engineers here, & one who wouldn't mind contacting me off-list? I may be misinterpreting what I'm seeing, but I think you might have a small number of MMSC servers that are down... -- Nathan

RE: Facebook (account)

Matt Harris wrote: > On Apr 9, 2019, at 21:05, Nathan Anderson wrote: > > > a FB page that this account of hers was apparently the only admin for. > > Redundancy: it's not just a concept to be applied to devices and wiring.    Preaching. To. The. Choir. :-) -- Nat

Facebook (account)

I'm not sure I would bother and I'd just tell her to get a new one. But she runs a business (popular local coffee shop) with a FB page that this account of hers was apparently the only admin for. Thanks in advance for any leads, -- Nathan Anderson First Step Internet, LLC nath...@fsr.com

RE: USA local SIM card

s LTE network with the MiFi and have your phone talk to the MiFi with WiFi. You said you were likely to use VoIP for voice communication anyway so not having a SIM in your phone doesn't sound like it would be a problem. (This may not solve your Canada problem, though...you'd sti

RE: SNMP "bridging"/proxy?

On Friday May 20, 2016 @ 21:45, Robert Drake wrote: > I would move away from this CPE vendor. I'm not thrilled with it either, but at this moment in time, this is easier said than done for many unfortunately good and unavoidable reasons. We will see how the future plays out, though. > [...]

RE: SNMP "bridging"/proxy?

Hey, thanks guys! I had never really looked that deeply into Net-SNMP and had only ever installed it either to use as a client (snmpget/snmpwalk) or a basic agent w/ standard MIBs for the host it's running on, so I was unaware of its extensibility. And it even looks like it ships with a Perl m

SNMP "bridging"/proxy?

'lo all, Is anybody out there aware of a piece of software that can take data from an arbitrary source and then present it, using a MIB or set of OIDs of your choosing, as an SNMP-interrogatable device? We have some CPE that supports SNMP, but considers it to be a mutually-exclusive "remote ma

RE: GeoIP database issues and the real world consequences

+1; had similar thoughts, even when reading the article. However, I don't really get especially angry/frustrated with the individual idiots who ignorantly used some sort of geolocation service to try to hunt down and exact revenge on somebody whom they *thought* they were being victimized by.

RE: Dial Up Solutions

What? -- Nathan From: NANOG [nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Dovid Bender [do...@telecurve.com] Sent: Saturday, October 17, 2015 6:31 PM To: wi...@staff.gwi.net; nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Dial Up Solutions You can use Asterisk. All yo

RE: DamnTest: ignore

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015, mikea wrote: > This post includes the word Damn. > > damn Well, dayum. -- Nathan

LTE

yers, and so far I have not found our vendor to be very helpful. If there is somebody out there that knows something about this area, and is willing to chat with me about it, feel free to drop me a line off-list. Thanks much, -- Nathan Anderson First Step Internet, LLC nath...@fsr.com

RE: SIP trunking providers

Okay, fair enough. I guess I made the assumption somehow that Mike was concerned solely about latency, which if that's all he is concerned about, then the points you bring up would largely be strawmen. But I just re-read Mike's post, and he doesn't state his reasons for wanting the local gatew

RE: SIP trunking providers

to a local Chicago MG anyway, so you're sweating bullets over nothing. And, like you said, origination for your end users would be hitting a Chicago MG already. Soo...problem solved? -- Nathan Anderson First Step Internet, LLC nath...@fsr.com F

RE: SIP trunking providers

ert, and again, if I'm missing something here, I would love to be proven wrong. -- Nathan Anderson First Step Internet, LLC nath...@fsr.com From: NANOG [nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Mike Hammett [na...@ics-il.net] Sent: Sunday, July 19, 2015 1:04

RE: cable modem firmware upgrade

them up to a test CMTS that we had on the bench in order to do so. I would strongly suspect that this is going to hold true for just about any DOCSIS modem. -- Nathan Anderson First Step Internet, LLC nath...@fsr.com

RE: Phasing out of telco TDM Backbones (was: Phasing out of copper)

audio codecs with L2. "PCM" and "VoIP" are not mutually-exclusive things by any stretch. -- Nathan Anderson First Step Internet, LLC nath...@fsr.com

RE: Gmail throttling?

to your domain and then implementing SRS on your mail server should ensure that all SPF checks pass, even for mail that your users are forwarding to Gmail. I wrote a post detailing my experience and findings: http://www.brokenbitstream.com/gmail-spf-policy -- Nathan Anderson First Step Internet, LLC nath...@fsr.com

Re: rr.com contact please

On Sep 16, 2013, at 19:07, "Matthew Petach" wrote: > On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 11:25 AM, wrote: > >> Can someone from rr.com please contact me. Your abuse desk seems to >> believe this netblock does not belong to you: [snip] > > If they don't want it, I'll be happy to take it > off their hands..

RE: Google having issues?

At about 5 minutes to 4:00p PDT, downforeveryoneorjustme.com confirmed that "it's not just you!" for google.com; in fact, it's still saying that, although I can reach Google services on our network now. I could also ping Google, but I tried to open a connection to port 80 on google.com via teln

RE: CNN broadcasting online free? Hogging my bandwidth...

On Wednesday, August 14, 2013 6:24 PM, Zachary McGibbon wrote: > I noticed my bandwidth graphs were a little out of whack tonight and after > much digging through pcap files I found that my chrome tab with 'cnn.com' > had a live stream of cnn playing on t

RE: 10 Mbit/s problem in your network

at that point, you might as well just pull some Ethernet. -- Nathan Anderson First Step Internet, LLC nath...@fsr.com

RE: Any experience with Grandstream VoIP equipment ?

at didn't work, and the IP that does? There has to be a difference somewhere, whether it is in the DHCP payload, the way a router or NAT engine upstream is treating that IP, or *something*. -- Nathan Anderson First Step Internet, LLC nath...@fsr.com

RE: Any experience with Grandstream VoIP equipment ?

s (1 FXS, no built-in router) ATA that also happens to do T.38 well. PAP2T had no T.38 support at all. SPA-112 price looks good, so I'm wondering what the catch is. -- Nathan Anderson First Step Internet, LLC nath...@fsr.com

RE: Microsoft Product Activation server reachability

.126.107:80/tcp - Port is open - time=98.491ms Yang On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 2:01 AM, Nathan Anderson wrote: > > So the ICMP message "communication prohibited by filter" must be a normal > response to ICMP ping through that gateway. > > Unfortunately, it's not compl

RE: Microsoft Product Activation server reachability

essage- From: Scott Howard [mailto:sc...@doc.net.au] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 10:55 PM To: Ben Carleton Cc: Nathan Anderson; nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Microsoft Product Activation server reachability Working now, tested from 3 hosts on different networks on both 80 and 443 : $ te

Microsoft Product Activation server reachability

requests. wpa.one.microsoft.com resolves to that IP via every DNS server I've tried (so no round-robin A records), Microsoft products that need to activate over the internet only try to resolve that FQDN, and I've looked for others without success (wpa.two.microsoft.com isn't valid, f

RE: AT&T DSL bypass first line

reboot your router to get it to take action again, then it might not exactly be blameless itself... -- Nathan Anderson First Step Internet, LLC nath...@fsr.com

RE: Comcast Ethernet Feed

historically had very bad luck/experience with 7200 FE interfaces and auto-negotiation, FWIW. -- Nathan Anderson First Step Internet, LLC nath...@fsr.com

RE: Issues with Gmail

rlier top-posting...have been forced to switch to Outlook, and just discovered Outlook QuiteFix.) -- Nathan Anderson First Step Internet, LLC nath...@fsr.com

RE: Issues with Gmail

The minute I saw your question, I tabbed over to an open session, and sure enough... -- Nathan Anderson First Step Internet, LLC nath...@fsr.com -Original Message- From: Jim Wininger [mailto:jwinin...@indianafiber.net] Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 1:02 PM To: nanog@nanog.org

Re: [NANOG] Microsoft.com PMTUD black hole?

Tomas L. Byrnes wrote: > As far as who Iljitsch is, everyone misspeaks from time to time. Even > those of us who have been at this for nearly 3 decades. I was simply LOLing at the fact that you found it necessary to give him a link to the NetHeaven article is all. ;-) -- Nathan Anderson

Re: [NANOG] Microsoft.com PMTUD black hole?

and therefore has an effect on overall performance." I for some reason interpreted the advertisement of the black hole detection feature as being a help to clients impacted by the inability of the server to perform PMTUD. -- Nathan Anderson First Step Inte

Re: [NANOG] Microsoft.com PMTUD black hole?

Tomas L. Byrnes wrote: > Some Edumacation on the topic is here: You do know who it is that you are responding to, right? :) http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/970 -- Nathan Anderson First Step Internet, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ NANOG mailing l

Re: [NANOG] Microsoft.com PMTUD black hole?

reason. Does anybody have any clue why that might be the case? -- Nathan Anderson First Step Internet, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ NANOG mailing list NANOG@nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog

Re: [NANOG] Microsoft.com PMTUD black hole?

ussing here. Apparently, it turns out my idea was no good. ;-) The original discussion about MS blocking ICMP to their own servers, which is the discussion it sounds like you are looking for, is over that-a-way... *points* -- Nathan Anderson

Re: [NANOG] Microsoft.com PMTUD black hole?

zed at the end of the message you quoted, there are potentially multiple paths between the same two hosts, and the path that the packet takes in one direction is not guaranteed to be the same path that the packet takes in the opposite direction. -- Nathan Anderson F

Re: [NANOG] Microsoft.com PMTUD black hole?

icket # for me and is, as I understand it, the e-mail address I was looking for in the first place (leads to their network/system people). I hope this is helpful to others. Regards, -- Nathan Anderson First Step Internet, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___

Re: [NANOG] Microsoft.com PMTUD black hole?

ath from the initiator to the server may be different than the PMTU of the path back from the server to the client. Hmmm. Okay, scratch that idea then. :-P -- Nathan Anderson First Step Internet, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ NANOG mailing list NANOG

Re: [NANOG] Microsoft.com PMTUD black hole?

NT's black hole router detection works to begin speculating at this point. I do plan on looking into it, however. -- Nathan Anderson First Step Internet, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ NANOG mailing list NANOG@nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog

Re: [NANOG] Microsoft.com PMTUD black hole?

pen ticket with Microsoft (thanks to this list, I found an effective contact), or to discuss the mechanics of PMTUD in general. Regards, -- Nathan Anderson First Step Internet, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ NANOG mailing list NANOG@nanog.org http://mailman.n

Re: [NANOG] Microsoft.com PMTUD black hole?

Nathan Anderson/FSR wrote: [...] > connections to that one host? Maybe even send out an MTU - 40 ICMP :s/40/sized. Brain fart. -- Nathan Anderson First Step Internet, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ NANOG mailing list NANOG@nanog.org h

Re: [NANOG] Microsoft.com PMTUD black hole?

rter" like this it seems to me it might smooth out some of these issues. The remote end could be "broken" with respect to PMTUD but it wouldn't matter. Thoughts? -- Nathan Anderson First Step Internet, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ NANOG mailing list NANOG@nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog

Re: [NANOG] Microsoft.com PMTUD black hole?

t it to the properly-spelled address and again promptly received a "User unknown" bounceback. -- Nathan Anderson First Step Internet, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ NANOG mailing list NANOG@nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog

[NANOG] Microsoft.com PMTUD black hole?

see it, I'm happy to post it.) Thanks, -- Nathan Anderson First Step Internet, LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] Original Message Subject: Microsoft/MSN/Live!/Hotmail behind blackhole router? Date: Thu, 01 May 2008 19:00:46 -0700 From: Nathan Anderson/FSR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: