It may also be related to QoS policy inside the carriers.
Some time ago I've seen exactly the same symptoms with Verizon when sip
signaling
was sent marked as EF. Remarking it down to CS1 or CS3 (don't remember exactly)
solved the problem.
Michael
On Wednesday 09 November 2011 13:47:37 Jay Naka
On Thursday 18 November 2010 18:18:04 Sam Chesluk wrote:
> There are a couple potential issues, that when looked at in whole, add
> up to a significant performance impact.
>
> 1) IPSec + GRE involves two forwarding operations, one to send it to the
> tunnel interface , and another to send the now-
Hello,
Just wanted to say thanks to everybody who replied and/or offered help.
I've got a few private peering offers, so I guess I'm ok now.
Thanks a lot,
Michael
On Friday 14 May 2010 11:25:10 pm Michael Ulitskiy wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I've started this thread looking
when
we do then I guess it'll be the time to look for the native transit.
Thanks,
Michael
On Thursday 13 May 2010 18:18:12 Michael Ulitskiy wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We're in the early stage of planning ipv6 deployment -
> learning/labbing/experimenting/etc. We've got
Hello,
We're in the early stage of planning ipv6 deployment -
learning/labbing/experimenting/etc.
We've got to the point when we're also planning to request initial ipv6
allocation from ARIN.
So I wonder what ipv6 transit options I have if my upstreams do not support
native ipv6 connectivity?
I
Can you be more specific about the problem saw?
We're having problems with their oc3 right now, not being able to push over
110m since this morning and still going on.
And sure can't get anything useful from verizon.
Thanks,
Michael
On Monday 22 June 2009 10:20:11 am James Kennedy (TT) wrote:
>
My bgp speaking devices are a couple of 7200s running 12.2(40).
Not the newest IOS out there, but it's been doing the job just fine up until
yesterday.
Yesterday, when that malformed announcement hit my routers they didn't crash,
but they did reset bgp sessions (even though I didn't accept the r
It hit my routers at 11:26:40, EST.
Michael
On Monday 16 February 2009 07:26:23 pm Adam Greene wrote:
> Anyone have an estimate as to when these long announcements began? Seems
> like the first reports appeared just before noon, UTC-05.
>
> We noticed a significant dip in Internet traffic to AS
8 matches
Mail list logo
