Re: Best practices for sending network maintenance notifications

> I think there was a BCP being worked on. I seem to recall it was being > discussed as a Facebook group. But there's no RFC, at least that I know > of. And additionally, putting the recipients in the To: line sounds like a really bad idea. Sharing PII without permission and stuff like that. Mak

Re: Craiglist blocked

> I know someone (not ops but ha can forward internally); forwarding to > him. If George's contact doesn't pan out, I have a name that I can forward your concern to. Ping me at work (address in the Cc:) with details if there's no response? > George William Herbert > Sent from my iPhone > >> On

Re: Craiglist blocked

> >> I know someone (not ops but ha can forward internally); forwarding to >> him. > > If George's contact doesn't pan out, I have a name that I can forward your > concern to. > Ping me at work (address in the Cc:) with details if there's no response? /facepalm Let's try that again, once more w

Re: Microsoft / Outlook.com contact???

> On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 17:47:28 -0700 Robert wrote: > RG> On 10/13/2015 5:44 PM, Robert Story wrote: > RG> > On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 12:25:27 -0700 Robert wrote: > RG> > RG> We are having a problem with email from a certain IP being > RG> > RG> rejected with code FBLW15. We have gone through the norma

Re: Microsoft / Outlook.com contact???

> Anyone from Microsoft / Outlook.com / Office365 around? > We are having a problem with email from a certain IP being rejected with > code FBLW15. We have gone through the normal channels but have received > no communication/acknowledgement from Microsoft at all. When did you send the request

Re: outlook.com outgoing blacklists?

> Turns out that there is in fact a list of sorts. > There were some days that the server was unavailable, and the domain was > added to this list. > The point of the list is unclear, but there is a list. I am not partial to the exact details, but it does appear that some action was taken and the

Re: outlook.com outgoing blacklists?

>> Anybody have some recommendations on how I resolve this > > The most likely explanation is a configuration error at your end, so the > first step is to share what the domain is. That's the 0th Step, actually. If people are going to ask for help, *PLEASE* provide us enough details to be able t

Re: protection.outlook.com SMTP support contact needed

> I'm running into TLS interoperability problems with some of the SMTP > servers under the inbound.protection.outlook.com domain. Are there any > Outlook postmasters lurking here that could contact me off list to help > debug this? Maybe... But I'd check to see if you might be on a DNSBL first,

Re: APEWS spam blacklist?

On Aug 8, 2012, at 6:41 AM, Tim Burke wrote: > Anyone have a contact involved with the APEWS blacklist? They have had a /19 > of ours blacklisted for almost two years and there seems to be no way to > contact them to get this resolved. In a word, no. Much sage advice here:

Re: Is Hotmail in the habit of ignoring MX records?

On Jul 27, 2012, at 8:47 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: > In message <25f0b21a-0319-45e3-9dbf-9906cb77a...@kapu.net>, Michael J Wise > writ > es: >> >> On Jul 27, 2012, at 6:40 PM, David Miller wrote: >> >>> MX records don't "chain". >>

Re: Is Hotmail in the habit of ignoring MX records?

On Jul 27, 2012, at 6:40 PM, David Miller wrote: > MX records don't "chain". But they do, "Expand". And I can think of a way whereby if an MX record referenced itself, *AND* included something extra … (did you see the something extra?) That it would be possible (and I'm not saying this is what

Re: Is Hotmail in the habit of ignoring MX records?

On Jul 26, 2012, at 6:34 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: > In message , Michael J Wise > writ > es: >> >> On Jul 26, 2012, at 1:35 AM, Lou Katz wrote: >> >>> The domain is cookephoto.com >> >> Why does mail.metron.com have MX records? > > Why do

Re: Is Hotmail in the habit of ignoring MX records?

On Jul 26, 2012, at 1:35 AM, Lou Katz wrote: > The domain is cookephoto.com Why does mail.metron.com have MX records? And they're different. $ host cookephoto.com cookephoto.com has address 192.160.193.89 cookephoto.com mail is handled by 10 mail.metron.com. cook

Re: DNS poisoning at Google?

On Jun 27, 2012, at 12:06 AM, Matthew Black wrote: > We found the aberrant .htaccess file and have removed it. What a mess! Trusting you carefully noted the date/time stamp before removing it, as that's an important bit of forensics. Aloha, Michael. -- "Please have your Internet License

Re: DNS poisoning at Google?

On Jun 26, 2012, at 9:35 PM, Matthew Black wrote: > Yes, we’ve used the Google Webmaster Tools a lot today. Submitted multiple > requests and they keep insisting that our site issues a redirect. Unable to > duplicate the problem here. … have you consulted the logs? If the redirect is there, it

Re: DNS poisoning at Google?

On Jun 26, 2012, at 9:07 PM, Ishmael Rufus wrote: > I'm glad I'm not the only one that miss this one: > > http://www.csulb.edu > > It is in his signature and email address as well ;) The queries do seem to be taking a number of seconds, though, as opposed to being nearly instant when I refere

Re: vixie, father of multitudes

On May 23, 2012, at 5:28 PM, paul vixie wrote: > it's lovely to have so many fans. keep those cards and letters coming. > (but, cc me!) Yessir! Aloha, Michael. -- "Please have your Internet License and Usenet Registration handy..."

Re: Vixie warns: DNS Changer ‘blackouts’ inevitable

On May 23, 2012, at 8:22 AM, na...@namor.ca wrote: > On Tue, 22 May 2012, Michael J Wise wrote: > >> So at some point, the lights are gonna be turned off. >> It's a shame the ISPs who have the infected users have done less to mitigate >> the issue. > > T

Re: Vixie warns: DNS Changer ‘blackouts’ inevitable

On May 22, 2012, at 10:47 PM, Randy Bush wrote: >>> When those servers are turned off, Customer Support folks at many >>> ISPs will prolly want to take their accrued vacation. >> Amen. And there will be thousands more of them when the court order >> expires than existed when the Feds called him

Re: Vixie warns: DNS Changer ‘blackouts’ inevitable

On May 22, 2012, at 9:10 PM, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote: > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 08:52:52PM -0700, Michael J Wise wrote: >> >> On May 22, 2012, at 8:35 PM, Randy Bush wrote: >> >>> father of bind? that's news. >> >> <http

Re: Vixie warns: DNS Changer ‘blackouts’ inevitable

On May 22, 2012, at 8:35 PM, Randy Bush wrote: > father of bind? that's news. He was there, and Put The Fix In, to down the network. I gather he's the one pulling it out on the appointed day as well. > dnschanger gon

Re: Microsoft/Hotmail forgot to set reverse DNS pointers?

On Mar 21, 2012, at 1:54 AM, Michiel Klaver wrote: > Diagnostic-Code: smtp;450 4.7.1 Client host rejected: cannot find your > reverse hostname, [157.55.1.150] > Anyone here who has proper contacts to give them the clue-bat? I gather the correct eyes are on the problem and it should be resolved

Re: Microsoft JMRP (Mail) Admin Needed

On Dec 19, 2011, at 6:10 PM, Richard Laager wrote: > I'm trying to sign up for Microsoft's Junk Mail Reporting Program. > Multiple representatives keep sending me more-or-less form responses > saying they can't add my dynamic … Stop right there. Are the IP addresses you are sending mail from Dyn

Re: Removal from mailing list

> Can I please get taken off all nanog mailing list. Some email programs will spell it out, but ... In the full headers, we see this: List-Unsubscribe: , Aloha mai Nai`a. -- " So this is

Re: Contact for APEWS.org?

On Feb 21, 2011, at 3:41 PM, Kate Gerry wrote: > We've been advised by a client that they're incorrectly listing a /15. What do your LOGS say? What did the BOUNCE say? Aloha, Michael. -- "Please have your Internet License http://kapu.net/~mjwise/ and Usenet Registration handy..."

Re: Alleged backdoor in OpenBSD's IPSEC implementation.

On Dec 14, 2010, at 9:56 PM, Ken Chase wrote: > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 09:39:02PM -0800, Chaim Rieger said: >> Does anyone remember the last time a law enforcement agency had >> someone sign a 10 year NDA on a backdoor? >> >> "Oh, times up, I can post it on Facebook now. Cool." > > 22:42 <@smar

Re: Tools for teaching users online safety

On Oct 25, 2010, at 9:06 PM, Ted Hatfield wrote: > Whatever instructional plan you put together make certain it includes > instructions on applying security patches and keeping your system up to date. > Probably the best thing most users can do to keep their systems clean. That, and ... NEVER

Re: BCP38 exceptions for RFC1918 space

On Aug 15, 2010, at 9:14 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > What's the current consensus on exempting private network space from > source address validation? BCP38-land MUST *never* see RFC1918-space traffic. Ever. Unless you're using a border router as a NAT device, of course The only way your qu