On Sun, 18 Feb 2024, 05:29 Owen DeLong via NANOG, wrote:
> Most firewalls are default deny. Routers are default allow unless you put
> a filter on the interface.
>
This is not relevant though. NAT when doing port overloading, as is the
case for most CPE, is not default-deny or default-allow. The
On Sat, 7 Jan 2023, 20:52 Masataka Ohta,
wrote:
> Matthew Walster wrote:
>
> > No... It's action based. You can send it a different route, you can
> > replicate it, you can drop it, you can mutate it...
>
> Replication is a poor alternative for multicast.
>
You conveniently ignore things like ID
On Sat, 7 Jan 2023, 03:17 Masataka Ohta,
wrote:
> Matthew Walster wrote:
>
> > it's just one aspect of it. Some use it for
> > classifying guest traffic etc.
>
> If special path is provided for guest or otherwise
> prioritized traffic, that's QoS routing.
>
No... It's action based. You can send
On Fri, 6 Jan 2023, 18:38 Mike Hammett, wrote:
> I suspect it always will have value, whether it's peering routers, POP
> routers, multi-homed customer routers, etc.
>
Indeed. It's not "clean" but it is an acceptable tradeoff if you know what
you're doing, and how traffic sloshes around etc.
I
On Fri, 6 Jan 2023, 11:25 Forrest Christian (List Account), <
li...@packetflux.com> wrote:
> In the end though, I do expect that the hassle of setting up and managing
> a solution like this is likely to result in most people deciding that it
> isn't worth the extra complexity just to avoid upgrad
On Fri, 6 Jan 2023, 17:07 Masataka Ohta,
wrote:
> Christopher Morrow wrote:
>
> > Some of the reasoning behind 'i need/want to do SDN things' is 'low fib
> > device' sort of reasonings.
>
> What?
>
> SDN is a poor alternative for those who can't construct a
> network with fully automated QoS guar
6 matches
Mail list logo
