Re: UCEProtect Level 3

2009-05-08 Thread Matt Liotta
On May 8, 2009, at 9:31 AM, Claus v. Wolfhausen wrote: Why do you believe people which are using Level 3 are not aware what it is doing? I am guessing the emails from uninformed victims wondering why their mail isn't getting through. Vigilantes always start out with the right intentions

Re: UCEProtect Level 3

2009-05-07 Thread Matt Liotta
On May 7, 2009, at 4:10 PM, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote: It is. I understand what they are trying to do but we were cut off from some places because someone else in the huge upstream we are with did something that appeared to be spam. It's too broad of a brush. Indeed. That is the sort of vigilan

anyone else seeing very long AS paths?

2009-02-16 Thread Matt Liotta
I am seeing them from 39625 and 47868. -Matt

Re: Coop Peering Fabric??

2008-08-12 Thread Matt Liotta
On Aug 12, 2008, at 6:17 PM, Deepak Jain wrote: There are lots of providers that can do connectivity between Any2 and Equinix. It has been suggested privately that some Equinix MSAs may prevent this sort of thing. In fact, to prevent this sort of thing, I suggested providing x-connects fro

Re: Coop Peering Fabric??

2008-08-12 Thread Matt Liotta
On Aug 12, 2008, at 5:06 PM, Deepak Jain wrote: Is there a more appropriate place for interested parties to discuss the possible creation of such a beast in the WDC area? I know we have about a lot of optical capacity we could help contribute to a stake in the ground between Equinix/Ash an

connectivity to MSN

2008-07-21 Thread Matt Liotta
Anyone having problems with MSN? Depending on which AS I use the traceroute dies in different places, but most of the time it dies in AS 8075. However, MSN does seem accessible from XO and Comcast. -Matt

[Nanog] 1275k st. DC

2008-04-18 Thread Matt Liotta
Anyone else seeing issues there? -Matt ___ NANOG mailing list NANOG@nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog