> On Mar 29, 2017, at 5:53 PM, Dan Hollis wrote:
>
> Why aren't _ALL_ consumer privacy regulations managed by the FTC?
>
> Why is the FCC needed here?
>
> -Dan
This was a consequence of the FCC declaring "information services” a Title II
service in an attempt to avoid losing yet another law
> On Mar 29, 2017, at 4:52 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>
> On Wed, 29 Mar 2017 16:02:45 -0400, Mark Radabaugh said:
>
>> And there you have much of the problem with this privacy bill.
>
> Hate to break it to you, but most of the gripes you have here are things
&
> On Mar 29, 2017, at 9:59 AM, Joe Loiacono wrote:
>
> Lowering barriers to entry is where the next political focus should be.
>
> Joe Loiacono
>
And there you have much of the problem with this privacy bill.
Read the actual Report and Order:
https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/F
respond to a valid
query. Given that the whole point of the domain is to enable email
printing, HP isn't making it easy.
Mark
On 5/3/14, 4:18 PM, Scott Howard wrote:
On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 6:27 AM, Mark Radabaugh <mailto:m...@amplex.net>> wrote:
Dear HP:
If your not g
Dear HP:
If your not going to support IPv6 can you at least not return SRVFAIL
when asked for an record:
root@spoons:/etc/mail # dig onramp01.hpeprint.com
; <<>> DiG 9.8.3-P4 <<>> onramp01.hpeprint.com
;; global options: +cmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status
ents is
also heavily involved in rural and last mile deployments and is
(depending on your view) either funding these deployments, distorting
the markets by discouraging private investment, or wasting lots of money.
Mark
--
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
m...@amplex.net 419.837.5015 x 1021
from VerizaTT. I really like
the new cell company game - no overage fees for the first 60 days, and
you have 30 days to cancel your 2 year service plan if you don't like it.
Mark
--
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
m...@amplex.net 419.837.5015 x 1021
lso be workable.
I'm not willing to do the hidden cap / fire the top user method.
Mark
--
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
m...@amplex.net 419.837.5015 x 1021
0.25%
500-599 4 0.1%
600-699 4 0.1%
700-799 3 0.1%
>800 1 0.03%
Overall average: 36GB/mo
The user at 836MB per month is on a 3.5Mbps plan paying $49.95/mo. Do
we do anything about it? No - because our current AUP and policies say
your kind responses, and I apologize once again if I am in
error.
Thanks for listening!
--
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
m...@amplex.net 419.837.5015
by Verizon end up costing far
more ? Or is the price difference mininal ?
Any information/insight appreciated.
--
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
m...@amplex.net 419.837.5015
frames
of their own choosing. I don't see multicast helping at all in dealing
with the situation.
Mark
--
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
m...@amplex.net 419.837.5015
hat system.
Why would "Federal Internet" be any different?
--
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
m...@amplex.net 419.837.5015
On 9/22/12 4:03 AM, Tore Anderson wrote:
* Mark Radabaugh
We can already do dual stack - that's not really a problem. I was
really rather hoping to avoid the giant NAT box. I'll take a look at DS
Lite and or NAT64/DNS64 and see if that makes any sense.
Both DS-Lite and NAT64 co
--
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
m...@amplex.net 419.837.5015
On 9/21/12 9:40 AM, Jeroen Massar wrote:
On 2012-09-21 15:31 , Mark Radabaugh wrote:
The part of IPv6 that I am unclear on and have not found much
documentation on is how to run IPv6 only to end users. Anyone care to
point me in the right direction?
Can we assign IPv6 only to end users
reach IPv4 only hosts?
The Interwebs are full of advice on setting up IPv6 tunnels for your
house (nice but...). There is lots of really old documentation out
there for IPv6 mechanisms that are depreciated or didn't fly.
What is current best practice?
--
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
m...@ample
m interested in. The el-cheapo
p-touch seems adequate to putting hostnames on machines.
Thoughts?
-r
--
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
m...@amplex.net 419.837.5015
er routers are
pathetic.A fair number of them still have IPv4 issues.
--
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
m...@amplex.net 419.837.5015
ww.mikrotik.com/thedude.php
I played with it briefly but it didn't really serve a purpose for us
since we derive our network layout from the OSS database.
--
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
m...@amplex.net 419.837.5015
On 11/23/11 11:41 AM, Keegan Holley wrote:
2011/11/23 Saku Ytti
On (2011-11-23 09:41 -0500), Mark Radabaugh wrote:
The question is: How does a router break in this manner?It
appears to unintentionally be doing something different with traffic
based on the source address, not the
but the very darkest conditions.
White service truck, orange cone, jeans, heavy cotton shirt and an
orange vest in the middle of the day is far less noticeable.
--
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
m...@amplex.net 419.837.5015
On 11/23/11 11:33 AM, Saku Ytti wrote:
On (2011-11-23 09:41 -0500), Mark Radabaugh wrote:
The question is: How does a router break in this manner?It
appears to unintentionally be doing something different with traffic
based on the source address, not the destination address.I
realize
mebody
isn't telling me something).
--
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
m...@amplex.net 419.837.5015
off and on too
often then somebody engineered the control and drive system
incorrectly. Operators (and processes) do stupid things all the
time. As the control systems engineer your supposed to deal with
that so that things don't go boom.
--
Mark Radabaugh
to deal with that so that things don't go boom.
--
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
m...@amplex.net 419.837.5015
ng buttons on the pretty screen.
Somewhere there is a terrified 12 year old.
Please don't think I am saying infrastructure security should not be
improved - it really does need help. But I really doubt this was
anything truly interesting.
--
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
m...@amplex.net 419.837.5015
last mile network.Otherwise we leave them alone.
--
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
m...@amplex.net 419.837.5015
On 6/27/11 1:19 PM, Matthew Black wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 18:29:14 -0400
Jay Ashworth wrote:
The North American Electric Reliability Council is planning to relax
the standards for how closely power utilities must hold to 60.00Hz.
Here's my absolute favorite quote of all time:
Tweaking th
n
speed and reliability. The technology is evolving quickly with
capacity and reliability making significant gains.
--
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
m...@amplex.net 419.837.5015
work Operations (855) FLSPEED x106
For our peering with Cogent they assigned us a /112 from 2001:550. When
we turned this up they dropped the old 'dual peering' thing for IPv4.
Said they did not need that arrangement any longer.
IPv6 seems to work fine with Cogent.
Mark
--
Mark Rad
On 5/11/11 11:19 AM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
On May 10, 2011, at 8:30 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
On 5/10/11 9:07 AM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
A good reason why every ISP should have a published civil subpoena
compliance fee.
23,000 * $150 each
On 5/10/11 8:30 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
On 5/10/11 9:07 AM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
A good reason why every ISP should have a published civil subpoena
compliance fee.
23,000 * $150 each should only cost them $3.45M to get the information
ach should only cost them $3.45M to get the information.
Seems like that would take the profit out pretty quickly.
--
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
m...@amplex.net 419.837.5015
On 12/4/10 10:52 PM, Ben Jencks wrote:
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 22:40, Mark Radabaugh wrote:
Probably a case of something being blindingly obvious but...
I have seen plenty of information on IPv6 from a internal network
standpoint. I have seen very little with respect to how a ISP is supposed
RIPng. The thought of letting Belkin routers (if
you can call them that) into the routing table scares me no end.
Is this way easier than I think it is? Did somebody already write the
book that I can't find?
--
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
m...@amplex.net 419.837.5015
table with.
--
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
419.837.5015 x21
m...@amplex.net
eed much
memory or CPU.
What projections are you using regarding the default free zone over the
next 5 years when picking new hardware?
--
Mark Radabaugh
Amplex
419.837.5015 x21
m...@amplex.net
38 matches
Mail list logo
