Anyone from Google,
You might want to fix a tiny typo in your security.txt.
RFC9116 uses American spelling, not British spelling, like you did.
Check here:
https://www.uriports.com/tools?method=securitytxt&domain=google.com
It's only a small issue, but it might spread when people start using
Hi,
At https://internet.nl we're seeing IPv6 connection issues on TCP port
25 (SMTP) to mx[1-4].smtp.goog.
Either 100% DROP (so no TCP connection) or ⅔ failure to setup connection.
Further testing seems to confirm the problem is bigger and on Google's side.
So, this fails:
echo 'quit' | nc
Or this?
https://bgp.he.net/AS14593#_peers6
Op 27/02/2024 om 13:17 schreef b...@uu3.net:
Well, for some basic overview you can use CAIDA AS rank.
You can use it directly, or you may try my (more user friendly)
frontend for it: http://as-rank.uu3.net/?as=14593
-- Original message
is to drop into the shell, make an
uncompressed copy of juniper.conf.gz, then pop back into the config
editor and load that over top of the editor's config view. Surely
there's a saner way of dealing with this.
--lyndon
--
Marco Davids
Hi Laura,
Something seems the matter, indeed:
https://dnsviz.net/d/european-union.europa.eu/YbCzrQ/dnssec/
It's weird; 1.1.1.1 resolves, 8.8.8.8 and 9.9.9.9 return SERVFAIL.
--
Marco
Op 08-12-2021 om 14:27 schreef Laura Smith via NANOG:
Bit of a long stretch given the US audience, but I'm
Hi again,
Op 22-10-21 om 17:13 schreef Job Snijders:
Tl;DR
Not at all. This was a very interesting read! Thank you.
While pondering over it, I noticed that the ns[1234].fastly.net servers
are nicely anycasted throughout the globe. If anyone could turn on IPv6
on their authoritatives withou
On second thoughts...
I seem to have been confused by the 'no records for fastly.net' (as
a DNS-purist: that should have said "ns[1234].fastly.net" instead, to
make it relevant). ;-)
I ran into this some time ago with deb.debian.org
Right.
So please ignore:
Just for the record; you
Hi Jens,
Op 22-10-21 om 14:03 schreef Jens Link:
I ran into this some time ago with deb.debian.org on an IPv6 only Debian
VM with a locally installed resolver. I opened a ticket which was closed
in record time: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=961296
Just for the record; your
Hi!
We currently live in times where is actually fun to go IPv6-only. In my
case, as in: running a FreeBSD kernel compiled without the IPv4-stack.
A few years back doing such thing was mostly disappointing, but nowadays
is actually quite doable and entertaining.
So, the other day I decided
Hello,
I'm trying to get in touch with webmas...@ntp.org. But so far without
luck. Maybe this route will help.
I noticed that quit a number of pages you mention on
https://www.ntp.org/ are no longer functioning.
Like http://lists.ntp.org/ and http://support.ntp.org/.
If anyone knows a way
Op 29-09-20 om 00:08 schreef Randy Bush:
> have folk looked at https://github.com/nttgin/BGPalerter
Yes.
It does the job. And it's easy to install and run.
--
Marco
On 03/10/2019 15:51, Stephen Satchell wrote:
> For a start, *add* IPv6 examples in parallel with the IPv4 examples.
1000 times +1
We need (much) more IPv6 examples!
--
Marco
(pushing for IPv6 examples since 2007 or so
like in: https://youtu.be/OLEizGPoB5w?t=30)
Op 03-05-19 om 17:14 schreef Brian J. Murrell:
I wonder if anyone has any references to interesting/useful/otherwise
resources on are only available to IPv6 users that they can forward to
me.
Most of my personals websites are IPv6-only, but they are neither
interesting nor useful.
Although,
Op 02-05-19 om 02:00 schreef Ask Bjørn Hansen:
Though, on the topic of unusual requirements there are a bunch of
contributors to the NTP Pool using this curious device
It continues to surprise me that there is still hardware being sold that
doesn't even support IPv6.
--
Marco
Op 04-04-19 om 01:14 schreef Mike Hammett:
Do you have sources for the ~90% T-Mobile IPv6? Not arguing, but to use
that as a source myself when spreading the IPv6 good word.
https://www.worldipv6launch.org/apps/ipv6week/measurement/images/graphs/T-MobileUSA.png
https://stats.labs.apnic.net/
Op 10-10-18 om 00:42 schreef Brandon Applegate:
I’m guessing synthesized. There are a couple of dns servers out there that can
do this. An interesting one I just found:
https://all-knowing-dns.zekjur.net
Or, if you prefer DNSSEC capable alternatives, try:
https://github.com/cmouse/pdns-v6
Op 04-10-18 om 22:07 schreef John Levine:
Even if you do have v6, some things like DNSSEC don't work very well
if you can't do them over v4.
Is that so?
--
Marco
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
Anyone knows why coogle.com only have IPv4-adresses on their
authoritative DNS?
https://ip6.nl/#!google.com
Are there any plans to fix this?
--
Marco
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
On 13/11/15 23:01, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 09:54:28AM +,
> a.l.m.bu...@lboro.ac.uk wrote
>
>> well, in EU I dont think that would ever fly.
>
> It is done in France, for a long time
And it is common practice in Belgium as well.
http://networkmsg.telenet.be/blo
Op 29-09-15 om 22:37 schreef David Hubbard:
> Had an idea the other day; we just need someone with a lot of cash
> (google, apple, etc) to buy Netflix and then make all new releases
> v6-only for the first 48 hours. I bet my lame Brighthouse and Fios
> service would be v6-enabled before the end o
Hi,
Is there anyone on this list that can get me in touch with someone at
Google/Gmail?
I would like to discuss a suggested improvement with them in regard to
RFC-compliance of DKIM/DMARC.
Please contact me off-list.
Thanks.
--
Marco
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signatur
Mark is right and I couldn't agree more with him.
On 15/07/15 08:22, Mark Andrews wrote:
> Yet I can take a Windows XP box. Tell it to enable IPv6 and it
> just works. Everything that a node needed existed when Windows XP
> was released. The last 15 years has been waiting for ISP's and CPE
> v
Hi,
Would anyone from Google care to explain to me off-list why certain
Youtube-content is blocked in the Netherlands while using IPv6 when it
is working fine via IPv4?
Geolocation imperfections perhaps?
The IPv6-address is within 2a02:a47f:e000::/36
(actually, it is: 2a02:a444:443b:0:::
Doug Barton schreef op 18-04-15 om 01:52:
> Harley is correct that 192.0.1/24 is mentioned in 1166, but AFAICS after
> cursory examination it has fallen through the cracks since then.
It has been seen in the wild a few times though (for whatever reason...)
https://stat.ripe.net/192.0.1.0%2F24#ta
Marco Davids schreef op 17-04-15 om 23:08:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6333 ?
Oh wait, that's 192.0.0.0/29, not 192.0.1.0/24...
--
Marco
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME-cryptografische ondertekening
Wasn't (part) of this space assigned to RFC6333? Carrier Grade NAT and
stuff...
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6333 ?
--
Marco
manning schreef op 17-04-15 om 22:45:
> nothing that is authoritative (anymore)… 1996-2000
>
> last century, 192.0.0.0/24 and 192.0.1.0/24 were identified as usable
one do any new work, just that you point me to
>> solid public documents that already exist. Feel free to share on-list or
>> privately, both documents you may have authored and those you have found
>> helpful.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> ~Chris
>>
>> Note: Not ever
Op 20-10-13 00:36, Randy Bush schreef:
> abha ahuja, researcher and operator, died this day in 2001
All these dear people that have passed away... Makes you think about
your own mortality, doesn't it?
And the list isn't going to get shorter, I am afraid. Kinda depressing...
Perhaps we should crea
On 09/13/13 03:53, Larry Sheldon wrote:
> On 9/12/2013 3:25 PM, Phil Fagan wrote:
>> Its a good point about the anycast; 99.999% should be expected.
> A small choice of attitude-reflecting language.
>
> I expect 100.000%
>
> I'll accept 99.999% or better.
>
It depends... define 'lost queries'. For
s, not
>> for the system operators. When the version of Bind in Debian Stable
>> implements this feature, I'll surely turn it on.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Bill Herrin
>>
>>
>> --
>> William D. Herrin her...@dirtside.com b...@herrin.us
Op 21-03-13 15:48, kg9020 schreef:
> Hello
>
> Have you tried
>
> https://github.com/blblack/gdnsd
Or maybe https://github.com/miekg/geodns, if you are into Go.
Here it an be seen 'in action':
http://dns-status.ntppool.org/#
--
Marco
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME-cryptografische ondertekeni
6noaI5sZh6R6lnkd48zGs/xPg4BNODG2zNb3I/lQ3
2ojQtcs9AIMDEtH5+XISuwvPre5hhYkneM6mtUc= )
;; Query time: 28 msec
;; SERVER: 8.8.8.8#53(8.8.8.8)
;; WHEN: Tue Jan 29 08:03:53 2013
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 227
--
Marco Davids
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME-cryptografische ondertekening
On 11/26/12 15:53, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
>>> Again, where're the compelling IPv6-only content/apps/services?
>>>
>> To answer your rhetorical question, http://www.kame.net/ has a dancing
>> kame. To my knowledge, that's the most compelling IPv6-only content.
> Don't forget http://loopsofzen.co.
On Wed, 4 Apr 2012, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
And what about this:
But two name servers, gamay and shiraz still work. So the domain
works
Actually it didn't resolve at all. Even an 'unbound-host -v -d'
failed.
But... things seem to be working fine again, at least to the extend that I
ca
On Wed, 4 Apr 2012, Matt Ryanczak wrote:
On 04/04/2012 04:28 PM, Craig Van Tassle wrote:
It works for me.
works for me too but there do appear to be some problems:
And what about this:
dig tools.ietf.org @merlot.levkowetz.com.
; <<>> DiG 9.7.0-P1 <<>> tools.ietf.org @merlot.levkowetz.com.
Hi,
Something seems wrong with the DNS of 'tools.ietf.org'.
Can anyone conform?
--
Marco
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Marco Davids (Prive) wrote:
Some nice info here, too: http://bgp.he.net/report/dns
.cw seems to be missing.
Oops, it isn't... it's just not wehere I expected it.
--
Marco
On Sun, 11 Mar 2012, Frank Bulk wrote:
Some nice info here, too: http://bgp.he.net/report/dns
Nice, but... not 100% up to date?
.cw seems to be missing.
--
Marco
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Doug Barton [mailto:do...@dougbarton.us]
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2012 5:14 PM
Cc: APN
Hi,
Can someone responsible for 'malware-bl...@opendns.com' please contact me
offline?
Thank you.
--
Marco
Hi,
I wonder... How many people here have activated DNSSEC validation on their
resolvers?
Please let me know off-list when the page below results in a green tick:
http://dnssectest.sidn.nl/
Additional details are welcome, like:
- The IP-address of the resolver(s) you used (if you know)
- Wh
Hi,
Could anyone responsible for ns[12].websitewelcome.com please contact me
off-list?
Or, can anyone give me a good pointer on how to contact the technical
staff of websitewelcome.com?
Thank you so much,
--
Marco Davids
41 matches
Mail list logo
