On 11/19/2021 1:27 PM, William Herrin wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2021 at 10:22 AM Zu wrote:
One anecdote (the non-technical grandma) illustrates a very real problem that
would need to be addressed -- there are non-technical people (of all ages, if
your concerned about ageism) which will need t
On 6/24/2019 10:44 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
It was impacting to many networks. You should filter your transits to prevent
impact from these more specifics.
- Jared
https://twitter.com/jaredmauch/status/1143163212822720513
https://twitter.com/JobSnijders/status/1143163271693963266
https://puck
On 6/6/2019 3:30 PM, Bryan Holloway wrote:
On 6/5/19 3:40 PM, Dovid Bender wrote:
If the FCC has their way the only place you will see the PSTN in
history books. I can only hope that the same happens to faxing.
I'm told that the one of the only reasons faxing is still a thing is
because o
In the past I've pulled down an XML file that included the IP space for
all of the O365 products. Then I filtered, sorted and aggregated what I
wanted for my internal use via a script.
On 9/25/2018 12:35 PM, David Bass wrote:
Sorry, I should have stated that I have already searched, and have
$100M+ in federal dollars goes a long way.
On 5/29/2018 10:17 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
Is that PennRen\Kinber?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Matt Hoppes"
To: "Lamar Owen"
Cc: nanog@nano
I just performed a few traceroutes.
Comcast to 4.2.2.2
5. hu-0-11-0-0-ar03.ivyland.pa.panjde.comcast.net
6. xe-4-0-0.edge1.Toronto.Level3.net
7. ???
8. b.resolvers.Level3.net
Comcast to Level3 customer
5. hu-0-11-0-0-ar03.ivyland.pa.panjde.comcast.net
6. xe-4-0-0.edge1.Toronto.Level3.net
Hi,
If you want to go the full stack, start open source and to have the support
and com.ext. option you can check iDoIT.
Good thing is, it has also a nice API for further automation and you can
use it as generall CMDB.
https://www.i-doit.org/
Rgds, SJ
Hi Mark,
Mark Tinka schrieb am So., 28. Feb. 2016 07:13:
>
>
> On 3/Feb/16 09:58, Nick Hilliard wrote:
>
> > Typically the features that fall by the wayside first are: reasonable
> > port buffers, qos knobs and decent lag/ecmp hashing support for mpls
> > packets.
>
> Cisco, in general, are suff
On 7/20/2015 2:57 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 19:42:39 +0100, Colin Johnston said:
see below for china ranges I believe, ipv4 and ipv6
You may believe... but are you *sure*? (Over the years, we've seen
*lots* of "block China" lists that accidentally block chunks allo
On 5/7/2015 2:25 PM, Daniel Corbe wrote:
Colton Conor writes:
The other thread about the Alcatel-Lucent routers has been pleasantly
delightful. Our organization used to believe that Juniper, Cisco, and
Brocade were the only true vendors for carrier grade routing, but now we
are going to throw
I believe the SSLLabs Analyzer should have pointed out an "Extra
Download" in the cert chain. That was the hint that there was an
intermediate cert that a client would have to go find on it's own
because it wasn't included with your server cert.
https://community.qualys.com/thread/12831
On 3
Wouldn't it be a BCP to set no-export from the Noction device too?
On 3/26/2015 6:20 PM, Nick Rose wrote:
Several people asked me off list for more details, here is what I have
regarding it.
This morning a tier2 isp that connects to our network made an error in their
router configuration cau
On 2/5/2015 9:42 AM, Eugeniu Patrascu wrote:
On Juniper things tend work OK. Other than this, make sure you don't
run into asymmetric routing as connections might get dropped because
the firewall does not know about them or packets arrive out of order
and the firewall cannot reassemble all of
Also note there is nothing stopping anyone from adding any community
they want.
The effect and how long the community stays attached to a route is
another matter.
On 1/7/2015 8:35 AM, Song Li wrote:
Hi everyone,
Today when I check one route in Routeviews I find something strange as
follows:
I had resurrected a similar thread last year:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/123155
There are sloppy networks out there. If it was a big enough problem all
you'd need is a few key networks drop those prefixes and we'd have
a...slightly less sloppy Internet?
On 12/11/2014
On 6/17/2014 3:19 PM, Matthew Petach wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:25 AM, Alan Clegg wrote:
On 6/17/14, 1:29 PM, rw...@ropeguru.com wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:25:37 -0400
valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:14:04 -0400, "rw...@ropeguru.com" said:
No, 8 individua
At one time Covad stated they announce everything as /24 to make
hijacking more difficult. Looks like Covad (now MEGAPATH) hasn't
changed that policy.
On 4/29/2014 12:29 PM, Kate Gerry wrote:
Already working on aggregating as much as I can. I was checking my tables the
other day and I th
On 4/2/2014 11:30 PM, Barry Greene wrote:
Hi Team,
Confirmation from my team talking directly to Indosat - self inflected with a
bad update during a maintenance window. Nothing malicious or intentional.
Barry
Did you get any details on what specifically went wrong? I don't recall
any swit
On 3/13/2014 6:42 PM, Piotr wrote:
Hi,
There is some open source sflow collector wich can talk via flowspec
with juniper routers ? something like snort + nfdump ? I looking
something besides Arbor because itis too expensive for me.
thanks for help
Peter
I believe the goal of ExaDDOS is
I couldn't resolve that domain or subdomains that I tried.
If that domain did respond, I'd guess it's tailored to be a large junky
response. Varying the qname prevents people from using iptables to
block specific queries.
On 2/18/2014 10:08 PM, Joe Maimon wrote:
Hey all,
DNS amplification
+1 Easiest to use by far.
Only thing I see as lacking for easy adoption is canned solution for
managing the push to the routers.
On 1/31/2014 9:04 AM, Job Snijders wrote:
On Fri, Jan 31, 2014 at 08:58:06AM -0500, Alain Hebert wrote:
IRRToolset 5.0.1 (rtconfig really) finally gave ou
On 1/15/2014 6:31 PM, Clay Fiske wrote:
Yes, yes, I expected a smug reply like this. I just didn’t expect it to take so
long.
But how can I detect proxy ARP when detecting proxy ARP was patented in 1996?
http://www.google.com/patents/US5708654
Seriously though, it’s not so simple. You only
On 1/1/2014 4:44 PM, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
> ipdeny.com provided a highly useful service: IP address allocations
> on a per-country basis. The site's still live but all (or nearly
> all) the data files are empty. The blog hasn't been updated, and
> email via their contact form goes unanswered. I'
On 12/20/2013 12:30 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>> I'd like to encourage people to use prefix-hint=::/48.
>>
>> The router should accept the /60 and deal with it, but it's better to have
>> Comcast's logs show that you requested a proper full-size prefix.
>>
>> I'm almost afraid to ask about the phras
On 12/11/2013 10:23 PM, Rob Seastrom wrote:
> Eric Oosting writes:
>
>> It brings a tear to my eye that it takes:
>>
>> 0) A long standing and well informed internet technologist;
>> 1) specific, and potentially high end, CPE for the res;
>> 2) specific and custom firmware, unsupported by CPE manu
On 12/11/2013 1:06 PM, Anurag Bhatia wrote:
>
> I am sure I am not first person experiencing this issue. Curious to hear
> how you are managing it. Also under what circumstances I can get a
> legitimate TCP query on port 53 whose reply exceeds a basic limit of less
> then 1000 bytes?
>
>
>
I'm not
On 12/8/2013 4:59 PM, Larry Sheldon wrote:
> On 12/8/2013 8:13 AM, Michael Brown wrote:
>>
>
> I've been getting several of these (empty messages) from different
> people and on different subjects but always on the NANOG list.
>
> Secret messages? Or is NSA sucking too hard?
>
I confirm I've been
On 2/18/2010 2:27 PM, Thomas Magill wrote:
> I am thinking about implementing a filter to block all traffic with
> private AS numbers in the path. I see quite a few in my table though so
> I am concerned I might block some legitimate traffic. In some cases,
> these are just prefixes with the priv
On 11/23/2013 1:22 AM, Andrew D Kirch wrote:
> Special thanks to Alexander from AT&T's "Tier-2" dept, though my
> suspicion is that that is not where he works, as he seems
> exceptionally clueful.
> Additional thanks to Owen DeLong who finally got me off my ass to
> actually do this, I'll see you i
On 10/19/2013 6:35 AM, Jean-Francois Mezei wrote:
> I need a reality check...
>
> For telcos, going from barely twisted copper pair to FTTH presents huge
> incremental improvement. FTTN is basically a stop gap medium term
> solution that is more pleasing to some beancounters.
>
> However, for a cab
On 10/11/2013 7:07 PM, Gary Baribault wrote:
> Hey, I'm a security guy, I'm paid to be paranoid, the only question is
> whether I'm paranoid enough .. I don't need another EMail addy
>
> Gary Baribault
> Courriel: g...@baribault.net
> GPG Key: 0x685430d1
> Fingerprint: 9E4D 1B7C CB9F 9239 11D9 71C3
On 10/8/2013 5:41 PM, David Temkin wrote:
> All,
>
> We're proud to announce that all of the recorded presentations from Monday
> at NANOG 59 in Phoenix have now been posted to Youtube. You may visit the
> NANOG 59 page at
> http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLO8DR5ZGla8j7_jnNYY3d8JB0HfdXe85X
>
On 9/18/2013 1:38 PM, Zachary McGibbon wrote:
> So iOS 7 just came out, here's the spike in our graphs going to our ISP
> here at McGill, anyone else noticing a big spike?
>
> [image: internet-sw1 - Traffic - Te0/7 - To Internet1-srp (IR Canet) -
> TenGigabitEthernet0/7]
>
> Zachary McGibbon
Traff
On 9/3/2013 11:57 PM, Scott Howard wrote:
> Overall this is nothing new - Hotmail has been doing the same thing for
> years.
>
> Scott
>
When I used to use Hotmail - Your account was dropped after 30-60 days
of non-use.
Whereas Yahoo kept accounts active forever until recently.
Granted it's
On 8/27/2013 5:04 PM, Ben Hatton wrote:
- time taken to turn around BGP import filter changes
So much This... You don't realize how important this is until your
nationwide provider takes 8 WEEKS to add one network to your (already set
up and working for 20 other networks) peering. Then decides
On 8/23/2013 1:30 PM, Jacques Latour wrote:
> Bill, not true.
>
> Following on our vision for Canada to have an IXP in every major city,
> specifically for Calgary, CIRA worked with CYBERA to organize a town hall
> meeting in Calgary, on September 14, 2013. At the meeting, we had interested
> m
On 5/31/2013 9:01 AM, David Hubbard wrote:
> Not holding my breath on that; been complaining to my VZ
> rep for v6 on fios for two years now since we have it in
> several remote locations and the most he could find for
> me as of last month was:
>
> "Verizon's First Office Application (FOA) is plan
On 5/17/2013 8:00 PM, Aaron C. de Bruyn wrote:
> I recall a message a while back about a company that offered remote hands
> nation-wide, but my Google-Fu is failing me.
>
> Any pointers?
>
> We basically need to find coverage for eastern Washington State and all of
> Oregon.
>
> -A
Perhaps Ledcor?
On 4/30/2013 10:31 AM, Thomas Schmid wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I know Tier1s are blackholing traffic all the time :) (de-peering,
> congestion etc.)
> but did it became a new role for Tier1s to go from transit provider to
> transit blocker?
>
> We received recently customer complaints stating they ca
On 4/23/2013 5:41 PM, Valdis Kletnieks wrote:
> I didn't see any mention of this Tony Hain paper:
>
> http://tndh.net/~tony/ietf/ARIN-runout-projection.pdf
>
> tl;dr: ARIN predicted to run out of IP space to allocate in August this year.
>
> Are you ready?
>
Where do the startup ISPs whom didn't
On 3/20/2013 9:25 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
I don't know a single ISP that wants to throttle growth by not accepting
additional customers, BGP speaking or not. (I do know several that want to
throttle growth through not upgrading their links because they have a captive
audience they are trying to
On 2/11/2013 7:23 AM, Saku Ytti wrote:
On (2013-02-11 12:16 +), Aled Morris wrote:
I don't see why, as an ISP, I should carry multiple, identical, payload
packets for the same content. I'm more than happy to replicate them closer
to my subscribers on behalf of the content publishers. How
On 1/17/2013 4:49 AM, Ryan Finnesey wrote:
What's the going rate now a days for a rack within EQUINIX?
Cheers
Ryan
I would imagine this varies greatly by market and maybe even suite
within the building.
How are operators using the data available in the various IRRs?
Using an example:
AS1 is your customer
AS1 has AS2, AS3 and AS4 described as customers in an IRR
Also assume AS2 has IRR data describing AS1000 and AS2000 as it's customers.
Are operators building AS path regexes such as the follow
I'm querying the community on the feasibility of running my own IRR on
behalf of customers whom probably aren't/won't register their own
objects. I'm going down this path since I don't believe RADB or ARIN
would let me register objects on behalf of my customers.
I know I'm going to need this
On 10/9/2012 11:05 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
On Oct 9, 2012, at 10:42 AM, Ryan Rawdon wrote:
On Oct 9, 2012, at 9:34 AM, Christopher J. Pilkington wrote:
I want to make an informed response to a comment made by our
CenturyLink rep regarding IPv6, in the context of SAVVIS not
being able to provi
Has anyone put in place a method to identify if one their BGP peers
suddenly withdraws X% of their prefixes?
e.g I should expect ~420k prefixes in a "complete"[1] routing table from
a transit peer today. If suddenly I'm only getting 390k prefixes I'd
guess a major network was depeered or simi
On 9/30/2012 12:46 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012, ML wrote:
So far our PMD testing has come back clear.
How have you done the PMD testing?
For verifying PMD and CD through an actual wavelength (not per-fiber,
but through all the ADMs etc), I haven't really been ab
On 9/30/2012 6:14 AM, Aaron Glenn wrote:
sent mostly towards the cladding and not the core and therefore.
Indeed. I have always held the idea that APC connectors induced
greater chromatic and/or polarization mode dispersion -- yet can't
find any resources that claim so, nor does that fit in wit
work mostly.
-ML
[1] http://www.pitx.net/
trouble.
Has anyone ever seen something like this before?
Is there any reason to see ICMP redirects on a single homed residential
subnet? I'm considering adding ICMP redirects to my customer edge ACL
unless there is a legitimate purpose for these packets.
Thanks
-ML
On 4/2/2012 12:27 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Darren Cusano"
Anyone experiencing any XO Outages? In the Philadelphia area our lines
are straight to busy.
We have some direct PRIs from XO in Tampa FL, and I have no reports from the
office of circuit problems at th
On 3/31/2012 1:09 PM, Oliver Garraux wrote:
As far as I know Ubiquiti's UniFi product doesn't yet have a single SSID
across multiple APs.
Unifi does use the same SSID's across many AP's. It actually does
that by default, unless you specifically disable an SSID on a
particular AP.
Oliver
Wel
On 3/31/2012 9:41 AM, Faisal Imtiaz wrote:
I understand Ubiquity gear is very common, in use and available in Iran ...
Look at their unifi product line.
Faisal
On Mar 31, 2012, at 5:38 AM, Shahab Vahabzadeh wrote:
Hi there,
I asked for a wireless solution for a university, in which they want
On 3/31/2012 6:12 AM, Andrew McConachie wrote:
Is this any different than what GigaBeam tried before they went bankrupt.
http://www.globenewswire.com/newsroom/news.html?d=177145
Their website only shows a control panel login now so I think they've
gone completely out of business. The only reaso
On 03/16/2012 05:51 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
If a company has a ROKSO record, you don't want to host them. And spamhaus
IS responsive.
Yes they don't take spam reports from people - they got their own traps.
They ARE responsive to requests for removal where the request checks out
and m
On 3/14/2012 2:22 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
NetRange: 100.64.0.0 - 100.127.255.255
CIDR: 100.64.0.0/10
OriginAS:
NetName:SHARED-ADDRESS-SPACE-RFCTBD-IANA-RESERVED
Did IANA have to justify this space to ARIN or was it just given to them
no questions asked because a
Not so shocking for people on this list..However after playing around
with a single-homed v6 connection to Cogent I was a little surprised to
not be missing just HE routes.
Apparently Google and Cogent aren't playing nice as I've been unable to
reach a number of Google's s for ipv6.google.
Hopefully someone here has wrestled with serial server oddities and can
shed some light on this...
I've got a serial console server made by Digi (TS8 PortServer) setup in
a fairly vanilla mode: 9600-8-N-1telnet to port 500X gets you to
port X. Setup for a vt100 terminal type. Other VTs
On 01/23/2012 10:02 AM, Jimmy Changa wrote:
Was anyone impacted by a botched fiber move in Miami this weekend? I lost 2
pieces of dark fiber for over almost 24 hours due to a fiber move being
performed by FiberLight. I'm curious if anyone else was impacted.
Sent from mobile device
Yes many p
On 01/19/2012 04:01 PM, Michael Hare wrote:
AS2381 has also received them, we are no further along in this than you
are.
On 1/19/2012 2:59 PM, Jay Hennigan wrote:
We have received three emails from the US Department of Justice Victim
Notification System to our ARIN POC address advising us that
On 10/14/2011 03:21 PM, Routing Analysis Role Account wrote:
List of Unregistered Origin ASNs (Global)
-
Bad AS Designation Network Transit AS Description
15132 UNALLOCATED 12.9.150.0/24 7018 AT&T WorldNet Servic
32567 UN
On 6/9/2011 4:39 AM, Tom Hill wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 23:39 -0400, ML wrote:
Did Cogent have the gumption to charge you more for IPv6 too?
We have a bit of transit from them (~20Mbit or so) to stay connected to
their customers.
Getting IPv6 setup was really simple. No extra charges
On 6/8/2011 9:51 AM, Nick Olsen wrote:
I'm sure someone here is doing IPv6 peering with cogent. We've got a Gig
with them, So they don't do that dual peering thing with us. (They do it on
another 100Mb/s circuit we have... I despise it.)
Just kind of curious how they go about it.
Do they issue yo
On 5/28/2011 12:18 PM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
I remember some discussion of this outage on NANOG, and on what it was costing
Egypt. Well, here is
an estimate - almost $ 20 million USD / day (which actually sounds low to me).
Regards
Marshall
http://english.aljazeera.net/news/africa/2011/05/2
On 5/11/2011 11:03 AM, ja...@jamesstewartsmith.com wrote:
I have had similar problems with our providers, and these are tier 1 companies
that should have already been full deployed. These are also some of the more
expensive providers on a per Mb basis. The one provider that was full IPv6
rea
On 4/18/2011 2:53 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
---
They are testing IPTV on Oahu in preperation for roll-out, so maybe they
renumbered in order to more easily identify the segments.(?)
Really, I'd have hoped they'd use their two-year-old 26
On 4/16/2011 3:39 AM, Subba Rao wrote:
Hi,
I am tasked to analyze the configuration of several Layer 2 Switches for
compliance. Most of these switches are from Foundry (now Brocade).
What tools are available to perform this task? I could write up a Perl
script to parse thru the configuration f
On 4/11/2011 10:13 AM, William Allen Simpson wrote:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/print/2011-04-11/level-3-agrees-to-acquire-global-crossing-in-deal-valued-at-1-9-billion.html
The deal will combine two unprofitable companies with total revenue of
$6.26 billion as of last year, and cut annualize
On 3/10/2011 12:15 AM, nanog wrote:
Good Evening all. I got an odd and somewhat crazy request from our
development group for a long haul OC48 connection for testing (they
specifically said from their office in Utah to the east coast and back)
with minimal jitter. They need to be able to run the
On 2/28/2011 9:53 PM, ML wrote:
Seeing some packet loss via Cogent.
www.internetpulse.net seems to be lighting up.
Looking at from Level3 via San Jose, NLayer via Chicago, Cogent via NY.
Seems like the trouble starts after: 0.ge-5-0-0.CHI01-BB-RTR1.ALTER.NET
Substitute CHI for NY, SJC etc.
Seeing some packet loss via Cogent.
www.internetpulse.net seems to be lighting up.
On 2/10/2011 11:37 PM, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
A high-speed/high-bandwidth wireless link connects the Cruzio 877 Cedar
facility with the Equinix San Jose facility via Mount Umunhum to provide
a wireless failover to the fiber in event of a fiber outage.
Interesting. Do you know which wireless
On 1/29/2011 10:05 PM, Jack Bates wrote:
On 1/29/2011 8:47 PM, ML wrote:
I just ran into something like this yesterday. A Belkin router with a
MAC of 9444.52dc. was properly learned at the IDF switch but the
upstream agg switch/router wouldn't learn it. I even tried to static
the MAC
On 1/30/2011 4:53 PM, Brandon Butterworth wrote:
I think it is too early in the deployment process to start dropping
routes based on RPKI alone. We'll get there at some point, I guess.
Do we really *want* to get to that point?
I thought that was the point and the goal of securing the routing
On 1/29/2011 4:24 PM, Jack Bates wrote:
Has anyone seen issues with IOS where certain MACs fail?
54:52:00 (kvm) fails out an old 10mbit port on a 7206 running 12.2 SRE.
I've never seen anything like this. DHCP worked, ARP worked, and arp
debugging showed responses for arp to the MAC, however, tc
On 1/24/2011 4:20 PM, Ray Soucy wrote:
That said. By not using the 64-bit boundary you may be sacrificing
performance optimizations with today's processors that lack operations
for values larger than 64-bits.
Is this an issue for any known vendors today?
On 1/18/2011 4:15 PM, Michael Ruiz wrote:
Hello all,
I am having some trouble getting my Cisco routers to use
Active directory to authenticate users. I have searched on Google and so
far I am coming up dry on good documentation that will work.
I know $myemployer Uses Cisco
On 1/18/2011 6:48 PM, Thomas Magill wrote:
Also, have you considered just using the spamhaus DROP list? They even have
code to have the list pushed to IOS available. You could simply substitute
your file for their list if you only want to use IPs caught by your honeypot.
http://www.spamhaus.
On 1/17/2011 6:55 PM, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
Hi!
1) The sites were already null routed. The problem is with Spamhaus'
inability to contact me prior to impacting other legitimate customers.
Null routed?
Its up!
[root@master tmp]# host www.viagra-shopping.com
www.viagra-shopping.com ha
On 1/12/2011 10:49 PM, Richard Barnes wrote:
Hi all,
What IPv6 prefix lengths are people accepting in BGP from
peers/customers? My employer just got a /48 allocation from ARIN, and
we're trying to figure out how to support multiple end sites out of
this (probably around 10). I was thinking abo
On 3/21/2007 6:25 AM, Tarig Ahmed wrote:
In fact our firewall is stateful.
This is why I thought, we no need to Nat at least our servers.
Tarig Yassin Ahmed
On Jan 12, 2011, at 4:59 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 21/03/2007 09:41, Tarig Ahmed wrote:
Is it true that NAT can provide more secur
I've got a customer that is looking to multihome with upstreams in two
POPs. Currently they multihome in one POP and utilize a single edge
router for some one to one NAT and some PAT for their users.
Before they turn up the BGP peer in the new POP I've advised them to
abolish NAT once and for
On 12/25/2010 3:36 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
On Friday, December 24, 2010 07:26:43 am Randy Bush wrote:
and do NOT redistribute bgp into ospf.
This is good truth. Don't redistribute your BGP into the IGP
(or vice versa). I'm not even sure OSPF would handle it in
this day - but you don't want to f
On 12/21/2010 10:49 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
Obviously, this probably won't happen. The Telcos in the US have far too
powerful a
lobbying force
Owen
Sad that we can admit this fact so freely.
On 12/21/2010 7:10 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote:
On 12/21/2010 5:18 PM, Frank Bulk wrote:
There are 4,035 routes in the global IPv6 routing table. This is what one
provider passed on to me for routes (/48 or larger prefixes), extracted from
public route-view servers.
AT&T AS7018: 2,851 (70.7%)
According to:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comcast
"Comcast has 15.930 million high-speed internet customers"
If a 10G port for transit is paid by comcast $30/Mbit/s monthly
that's 0.19 cent/internet customer/month for a new 10G port
to properly desaturate this particular link.
Did I compute s
Anyone else get alerts from their BGP monitoring system (In my case
Cyclops) saying Cogent briefly announced some more specific prefixes?
AS path as reported by Cyclops: 7575 46135 174 174
/20s broken into /23s
/23s became /24s
Also saw alerts for one to one (/23 announced has /23)
All alerts
On 11/19/2010 3:45 PM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
It seems that the Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act (COICA)
passed through the Senate Judiciary Committee
with a unanimous (!) vote :
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/11/pirate-slaying-censorship-bill-gets-unanimous-sup
On 11/13/2010 11:11 AM, David Ulevitch wrote:
Good morning,
Does anyone have any updates they can share on the register.com outage
that has been happening since sometime yesterday? They don't seem to
have any sort of explanation or status page (aside from the note on
their homepage). Is there
this. Maybe other DNS
hosting companies do...
-Original Message-
From: ML [mailto:m...@kenweb.org]
Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2010 10:59 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Register.com DNS outages
On 11/14/2010 10:20 PM, John Lightfoot wrote:
My company uses register.com for DNS hosting and
On 11/14/2010 10:20 PM, John Lightfoot wrote:
My company uses register.com for DNS hosting and we were hit by its troubles
this weekend. I know there are companies that offer backup DNS services,
but those seem to be aimed at companies that host their own DNS, which we're
not really interested i
On 11/10/2010 12:26 AM, Sean Donelan wrote:
While the answer is always it depends, I was wondering what the current
rules of thumb university network engineers are using for capacity
planning and oversubscription for resnets and admin networks?
For K-12, SETDA (http://www.setda.org/web/guest/202
IPv6 isn't going to make class-based routing obsolete... is it?
*ducks*
cheers!
Andrew
Of course not. My users are already asking for some Class G networks
(/56) to use.
> And +1 on the "pioneers" comment too.
Paul.
IPv6 Hipsters..Doing it before it was cool.
On 9/25/2010 10:57 PM, fedora fedora wrote:
I am having problem getting ping to work to a specific destination host when
using large size icmp packet and i am hoping someone here can offer some
suggestion.
With regular ping, i can ping this remote host without any problem, but if i
crank up the
On 8/23/2010 7:54 PM, Dave CROCKER wrote:
>
>
> On 8/23/2010 3:38 PM, John Kristoff wrote:
>> many of the other instructors they come into contact with
>> are focusing only on class A, B, C addressing
>
>
> wow.
I'm just as surprised as you are. They left out AppleTalk.
On 8/22/2010 2:38 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> No, because DNSSEC isn't secured all the way from the DNS server to the
> application, only to the resolver. Both systems have problems, I'd
> imagine the best security is when they work together.
>
Is a DNSSEC capable stub resolver not in the car
Would a future with a ubiquitous DNSSEC deployment eliminate the market
for commercial CAs?
Would functioning DNSSEC + self signed certs be more secure/trustworthy
than our current system of trusted CAs chosen by OS/browser developers?
Hi, I'm putting together a book on security*, and wanted some expert
input onto network monitoring solutions...
http://www.subspacefield.org/security/security_concepts.html
Nagios, Net-SNMP, ifgraph, cacti, OpenNMS... any others?
Any summaries of when one is better than the other?
Any suggestio
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
