I've said it before, and I'll say it again:
The only thing stopping global IPv6 deployment is
Netflix continuing to offer services over IPv4.
If Netflix dropped IPv4, you would see IPv6 available *everywhere*
within a month.
--lyndon
> > How many legacy mail clients can handle IPv6?
I would suspect all of them, since MUAs, by definition, are not
involved in any mail transport operations. But if you're thinking
of MUAs that use Submission, they are unlikely to care one whit
what the underlying transport is. You configure a s
And what are they going to do when 240/4 runs out?
OFFS people, spare me the bikeshed. It was a simple yes/no question.
In case you missed it, here is the decision tree:
/---\
| START |
\---/
|
|
^
/ \
/ \
/ \
/ \
/ \
/Do Yo
Diogo Montagner writes:
> --728632060377d0b2
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> I would first try to understand what you are trying to achieve. JUNOS is
> very flexible on this front and I am wondering why you think yacc is the
> right way to achieve what you are trying to
Nick Hilliard writes:
> No need to reinvent that wheel:
>
> root@foo> show configuration | display xml
> root@foo> show configuration | display json
That doesn't quite work for this scenario. It would mean ssh-ing
to the switch to grab it, and that's pretty locked down. We already
have cron job
Any chance somebody out there has a yacc grammar that will parse
a Juniper config files? My immediate interest involves v19.X on
our EX4300s, but anything in the ballpark would save me having to
write one from scratch.
--lyndon
For the hams attending 88, should we pick a simplex
frequency or two to rendevouz on for beer consumption
planning purposes? I'll be armed with a tribander for
146/222/440.
--lyndon
Forrest Christian (List Account) writes:
> I'm also wondering if this might be a "no one that has got the request
> actually has a clue how to resolve your issues" issue. I've seen
> situations where companies don't know how to respond to a request outside
> the most common requests they get.
Forrest Christian (List Account) writes:
> I can't speak for aptum, but I'm curious as to why this is important to
> you? I'm not trying to discount this at all, just curious why this
> matters in the internet of 2023.
Two main reasons.
1) We are trying to set up internal peering with AWS, an
It seems Aptum has decided they will no longer SWIP any of their
address space. I've been trying to get a SWIP for a /48 that we
were allocated in 2017, but they refuse. And I also see they have
pro-actively gone in and un-SWIPed both our /24s.
Since you are ignoring my tickets about this, maybe
It has been a couple of decades since I've done any BGP in anger,
but it looks like I will be jumping into the deep end again, soon,
and I desperately need to get up to speed again.
There seem to be a lot of good guides out there from Cisco, Juniper,
and the like, but naturally they are very produ
Robert Schoneman writes:
> I've tested accessing one of our sites that uses Imperva WAF w/ DDOS protec=
> tion enabled from an iPhone w/ Apple Private Relay turned on. I experienced=
> no issues but only have that single test to go on. =20
A couple of people from Cloudflare and Apple contacted me
We have been receiving a steady stream of calls from customers
complaining they cannot reach our websites when they have Apple's
Private Relay enabled.
For those in the dark, Private Relay sends (only) Safari connections
through an assortment of CDNs to anonymize the client's IP address.
What we
Jon Lewis writes:
> > I've noticed a few (small number) of robocalls have started spoofing
> > international phone numbers instead of local phone numbers. I don't know if
> Are you sure this isn't just either a failure to spoof or incompetent
> spoofing?
Nope. I've been seeing an increasing n
Owen DeLong writes:
> top
> rollback
I am *sure* I tried exactly that but it wasn't working as I expected.
But maybe I was just imagining things. And somehow I completely
missed the 'rollback 0' variant while plowing through the
documentation.
Thanks everyone for assisting the blind ;-)
--lynd
Nick Suan via NANOG writes:
> I was actually interested to see if the EX series would let me do this, and i
> t turns out that if STP is enabled on any of the switch interfaces, it won't:
> tevruden@core-02# commit check
> [edit protocols rstp]
> 'interface'
> XSTP : Interface ge-0/0/0.0 is
Marco Davids via NANOG writes:
> rollback 0
OFFS 8-0 Thanks :-)
On an EX4300 switch running JunOS 14.1 let's imagine I typed
config
delete interfaces
before coming to my senses. How am I supposed to back out of that
mess? For the life of me, after a week of reading the 3000 page
reference manual, and endless DuckDuckGoing, I cannot see a sim
19 matches
Mail list logo
