> The last mile for the Level3 is coming on Telus (after a punch to
> the face and gut for build out fee) so I'd like someone else.
> Shaw does not offer service without what I suspect is another
> punch to the face for a build out. Bell didn't return any of my
> inquiries via email of voice messa
I hope someone will explain the operational relevance
of this ...
Sun V100 FreeBSD firewall/border gateway
Sun V100 Plan 9 kernel porting test bed
Sun V100 OpenBSD build/test/port box
Intel 8-core Solaris fileserver and zones host
AMDx4Random OS workstation
> no no no.. it's simply, since the OP posited a math solution, md5.
> ship the size of file + hash, compute file on the other side. All
> files can be moved anywhere regardless of the size of the file in a
> single packet.
MD5 compression is lossy in this context. Given big enough files
you're g
> Guess that move to Amazon EC2 wasn't such a good idea. First reddit,
> now netflix.
> http://techblog.netflix.com/2010/12/four-reasons-we-choose-amazons-cloud-as.html
FWIW, at $DAYJOB we haven't been able to run out a pool of a couple of
dozen EC2 instances for more than two weeks (since last Ju
> Just how much free time do you have? :)
1 minute to google the capacity of a 747-400F.
1 minute to google the dimensions and weight of an lto-4 cartridge.
1 minute to punch the numbers into bc(1).
--lyndon
> Also, who you will really trust to run it ?
The UUCP network chugged along quite nicely for many years without any
central authority. (Pathalias and the maps weren't an authority, just
a hint.)
--lyndon
> Marketing by annoyance, smoke, and mirrors? Gotta love the strategy
But as was demonstrated by the link they posted earlier today, they
make a good filter for determining "news" organizations that operate
on the theory of "news by press release."
Think of them as a honeypot feed :-P
--lyndon
s...@cs.columbia.edu:
> I am seriously suggesting that a redirect mechanism -- perhaps the email
> equivalent of HTPP's 301/302 -- would be worth considering.
We already have SMTP's 221 and 521 response codes for this. But because the
response text is free-form there's no way to reliably parse ou
I have a client in Edmonton who's looking for a network drop to their
office, something in the 2-10 MB/s range. The location is at 46 Ave.
and 99 St.
The core requirement is for a bare unfiltered *symmetric* pipe (no
ADSL). Traffic volume will be low: 2-4 laptop VPNs plus some light
web server an
> RFID tags are generic, you don't put data into them unique to your
> application.
Field programmable RFID-like tags do exist. They aren't common, but
they're out there.
> Barry's right, for at least some scenarios. If I have an unauthorized somebody
> walking down the row with a wand in their pocket, the fact they have a wand in
> their pocket is the least of my problems.
Encrypt the data?
> FWIW: http://www.he.net/releases/release18.html
How long can they go on those 3000 gallons under their current
load?
> Rogers
> says they don't do that, and lots of other people seem to be able to
> use port 587 on Rogers (and other ISPs) without problems.
I'm in Calgary right now so I can't check the current behaviour, but
as of June 1st it was still broken. Broken in the sense that any
connection to port 587
> Few
> companies use the MSP port (tcp/587).
Can you elaborate. Is this based on analysis you've conducted on
your own network? And if so, is the data (anonymized) available for
the rest of us to look at?
My experience is that port 587 isn't used because ISPs block it
out-of-hand. Or in the ca
14 matches
Mail list logo
