iscounted Juniper, Cisco, or Arista. I
> am not seeing the savings on paper.
>
> If we could just buy the whitebox hardware, and have a free operating
> system on there, then financially whitebox switches would be half the cost
> of a similar Cisco switch after discount.
>
> Am I missing something?
>
>
> --
:Luke Marrott
I'm looking to evaluate some solutions for Rate limiting and bit counting /
metering. I am not really interested in Filtering packets by application or
protocol, just delivering bandwidth at a defined service level based on
endpoint IP. I would also like to have the option to track how much data is
We have a 10GigE connection with XO in Utah and have gotten little to no
response from XO on our IPv6 requests for months.
We finally got our L3 IPv6, but they don't have a complete routing table.
:Luke Marrott
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 11:38 AM, Jonathan Lassoff wrote:
> On Mon, May
e yet?
Thanks!
:Luke Marrott
that almost all PON technology is proprietary, locking you
into a specific hardware vendor. However I think this is changing or has
already changed, opening PON up for interoperability. Can anyone confirm
this?
Thanks in advance.
:Luke Marrott
ponders,
> it is intentionally designed to cut that access.
>
> Regards,
> Bill Herrin
>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> Walter Keen
> Network Technician
> Rainier Connect
> (o) 360-832-4024
> (c) 253-302-0194
>
> References
>
> 1. mailto:car...@race.com
>
--
:Luke Marrott
assume this will be the standard definition for a number of
years to come.
Thanks.
--
:Luke Marrott
7 matches
Mail list logo
