Here's what I always refer too
http://www.cisco.com/web/partners/downloads/765/tools/quickreference/routerperformance.pdf
It's close. I don't think the testing incorporates a lot of services
in use on the routers, however.
For max interfaces, read up on this:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/product
>
>
> > >
> > I did this by creating a 6to4 tunnel to a relay provided by
>
> 6in4, not 6to4. While HE do operate 6to4 relays, the brokered tunnel
> service is 6in4.
>
>
A very important distinction I didn't have clear in my head. To regurgitate
some reading I just completed: both methods use v6
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Deric Kwok wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I am trying to configure website for testing ipv6
>
> Just wander how internet users eg: DSL users can visit this website
> and any people can access this website over the world
>
>
I did this by creating a 6to4 tunnel to a relay prov
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Rettke, Brian wrote:
> Content providers (e.g. Netflix, Hulu, YouTube) will always try to get
> their content serviced for little to no cost. The low cost, web-only plan
> isn't sustainable, and the amount of Netflix traffic around the globe is a
> good example; The
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Nathan Eisenberg
wrote:
> > Maybe the ISP's should move this choice to the consumer.
>
> The consumer already has this option on many SOHO firewalls. No action by
> ISPs is required. But this is totally irrelevant to the idea of Net
> Neutrality.
>
>
Yes - but y
so you'd like to foist the problem off to the provider
> (cost/configuration) and benefit? Are you willing to pay some
> incrementally higher charge per month for that service? what about for
> security services? Do you think there are enough folks willing to pay
> for this sort of thing that it'd
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 9:36 AM, Nathan Eisenberg
wrote:
> > Is there a performance difference between the Internet and Internet2?
> > Should that be allowed, or must all IP networks have the same
> > performance?
>
> I think that statement may confuse metrics like performance and capacity,
> with
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Jessica Yu wrote:
>
> I do not know if making such distinction would alter the conclusion of your
> paper. But, to me, there is a difference between one to predict the growth
> of
> one particular network based on the stats collected than one to predict the
> growt
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Vitkovsky, Adam wrote:
>
> Yes please -option d also known as option AB
> -it's the same as option b with addition of VRFs on the ASBRs
> -it might as well be viewed as a natural step between opt a and opt b
>
> -opt ab offers the same great control over the routes
I think if you try to traffic-shape 80Mbps on that platform you'll have
problems. We have a 7200 with NPE-G1 (rate limited at 80Mbps) and it killed
the CPU when the threshold was hit. I imagine that traffic-shaping would do
the same to CPU and memory. I'd lab it first.
Kenny
On Thu, Jul 8, 201
y
> or
> > hw redundancy or both, etc.. This will also have an impact.
> >
> > I've seen some 'odd' issues with BGP on the ASR1k, so you really do want
> to
> > track the latest code. It's also recommended to keep a close eye on your
> > memory
Anyone have recommendations on solid IOS XE code for ASR 1002 that's just
doing:
- BGP
- VRF's
- Many sub-interfaces and ACL's
It shipped with 02.04.02.122-33.XND2.bin
Thanks,
Kenny
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 12:16 PM, Brian Johnson wrote:
> Security Gurus, et al,
>
> I have my own idea of what a firewall is and what it does. I also
> understand what statefull packet inspection is and what it does. Given
> this information, and not prejudging any responses, exactly what is a
> f
Hello Stephane - if you search google for VRF aware IPSEC you will find
links and relevant information and configs.
I did this on older hardware by creating an IPSEC tunnel between 2 routeable
loopbacks and creating a GRE tunnel that used the loopbacks and tunnel
source and destination. Then plac
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 2:55 AM, Rens wrote:
> All the interfaces are forced to 1Gbps and full duplex.
>
> Maybe I should give some extra info.
> All the traffic seems to pass ok via that link but I have seen that often
> OSPF adjacencies go down/up , I suspect that the HELLO packets are being
>
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Kenny Sallee wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Ivan Pepelnjak wrote:
>
>> This might give you some ideas (also solves the overlapping customer
>> address
>> problem):
>>
>> http://www.nil.com/ipcorner/FlexE
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Ivan Pepelnjak wrote:
> This might give you some ideas (also solves the overlapping customer
> address
> problem):
>
> http://www.nil.com/ipcorner/FlexExtraImplement/
>
> Ivan
>
> http://www.ioshints.info/about
> http://blog.ioshints.info/
>
That looks very inte
Questions for the community: from a Application Service Provider
perspective - how / can one provide application access to a group of
Enterprises where the ASP provider provides ASP like applications to all
Enterprise customers who have multiple locations and who may or may not have
overlapping ad
18 matches
Mail list logo
