Anyone outside of S. California affected?
On the MX204 that is..
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 2, 2019, at 3:27 PM, Kenneth McRae via NANOG wrote:
>
> 1 Gig is supported on later release versions
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Sep 2, 2019, at 1:49 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
>>
>>
>>
&g
1 Gig is supported on later release versions
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 2, 2019, at 1:49 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 2/Sep/19 10:28, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> What about handling LAG on 1Gb/sec links? That is a major showstopper
>> if indeed it is missing:
>>
>> https:
You will also need to add you localhost as a source if you want to show that
ntp association status on the router
apply-flags omit;
term allow-ntp {
from {
source-prefix-list {
ntp-server;
localhost;
}
protocol udp;
port ntp;
}
Is this widespread?
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
Outage confirmed by support staff. No present ETR.
> On Aug 7, 2018, at 2:47 PM, William Herrin wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone have information on the godaddy outage? I don't see
> anything on https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/outages or
> status.godaddy.com but my DNS server logs:
>
>
Yes. I use Opengear with great success. I use Verizon, T-Mobile & AT&T
prepaid service depending on the area. When integrated with Opengear
Lighthouse, the console server is fully manageable via cellular service.
Kenneth
> On Feb 6, 2018, at 6:34 AM, Michael Starr wrote:
>
> Hello NANOGers
Greeting all,
Is anyone out there using PON in a campus or facility environment? I am
talking to a few vendors who are pushing PON as a replacement for edge
switching on the campus and in some cases, ToR switch in the DC. Opinions on
this technology would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Ken
How stable can GRE transports and BGP sessions be when under load?
I typically protect the BGP session by policing all traffic being delivered to
the remote end except for BGP. Using this posture, my BGP session over GRE are
stable; even under attack.
Kenneth
On Jun 30, 2015, at 01:37 PM,
Managed Services – xISP Solutions – Data Centers
http://www.thebrotherswisp.com Podcast about xISP topics
http://www.midwest-ix.com Peering – Transit – Internet Exchange
On Feb 7, 2015, at 4:30 PM, Kenneth McRae wrote:
I will live vicariously though your experiences with them. I'm go
Why aren't you also looking at Hauwei?
On Apr 01, 2015, at 09:53 AM, Mohamed Kamal wrote:
In our effort to pick up a reasonably priced DDoS appliance with a
competitive features, we're in a process of doing a PoC for the
following shortlisted vendors:
1- RioRey
2- NSFocus
3- Arbor
4- A10
The
aisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
From: "Kenneth McRae"
To: "Faisal Imtiaz"
Cc: "Rodrigo 1telecom" , "NANOG"
Sent:
6 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
From: "Kenneth McRae"
To: "Faisal Imtiaz"
Cc: "Rodrigo 1telecom" , "NANOG"
Sent: Saturday, February 7, 2015 4:01:29 PM
Subject: Re
them, did not meet the specs, they took it back no questions
asked.
Regards.
Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
7266 SW 48 Street
Miami, FL 33155
Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
From: "Kenneth McRae"
To: "
05 663 5518 x 232
Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
From: "Kenneth McRae"
To: "Faisal Imtiaz"
Cc: "Rodrigo 1telecom" , "NANOG"
Sent: Saturday, February 7, 2015 3:49:16 PM
Subject: Re: Low cost WDM gear
That'
he design, loss, and just buy stuff
based on whatever, then it does not matter who the mfg. is, you are very very
likely to be surprised in a bad way.
:)
Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
- Original Message -
From: "Rodrigo 1telecom"
To: "Kenneth McRae"
vices in the path, and are blaming a Mfg for the mistake... They clearly
list the insertion loss for the different muxes in the specs on their website.
Faisal Imtiaz
Snappy Internet & Telecom
- Original Message -
From: "Kenneth McRae"
To: "Rodrigo 1telecom"
r.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -----
From: "Kenneth McRae"
To: "Mike Hammett"
Cc: "NANOG"
Sent: Saturday, February 7, 2015 12:17:35 PM
Subject: Re: Low cost WDM gear
Are you look
one
Grupo Connectoway
Em 07/02/2015, às 14:55, Kenneth McRae escreveu:
Mike,
I just replaced a bunch of FiberStore WDM passive muxes with OSI Hardware
equipment. The FiberStore gear was a huge disappointment (excessive loss, poor
technical support, refusal to issue refund without threatening le
l.com
- Original Message -
From: "Christopher Morrow"
To: "Kenneth McRae"
Cc: "NANOG"
Sent: Saturday, February 7, 2015 12:02:11 PM
Subject: Re: Low cost WDM gear
would be good for mike to define 'long distances' here, is it:
2km
30km
300km
3000km
Mike,
I just replaced a bunch of FiberStore WDM passive muxes with OSI Hardware
equipment. The FiberStore gear was a huge disappointment (excessive loss, poor
technical support, refusal to issue refund without threatening legal action,
etc.). I have had good results from the OSI equipment s
Greetings Everyone..
Here is one for the transport/backbone/data center guys. Can you tell which
manufactures you like for optical transport? I am looking for a solution to
provide 8 channels of DWDM using tuned optics in my network gear. DWDM
transport will be used for multiplexing only (no
Using open gear exclusively now...no real issues with it.
Sent from my iPad
> On Feb 21, 2014, at 6:39 AM, Hank Disuko wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
> I wonder if anyone has good experiences to share with out-of-band hardware?
> I'm looking for a good OOB hardware vendor. I need to manage my
> router
By device or you can purchase an unlimited device count..
On Oct 24, 2013 8:59 PM, "Tammy Firefly" wrote:
> Is that licensed per device or per user out of curiosity ?
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Oct 24, 2013, at 21:45, Kenneth McRae
> wrote:
>
> > H
Hiw about SolarWinds Config Mgmt software?
On Oct 24, 2013 8:38 PM, "Jimmy Hess" wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Job Snijders <
> job.snijd...@hibernianetworks.com> wrote:
>
> > Dear all,
> > I am unsure what we as networkers have done in the past, but I am sure
> > we've done our fair
What is the public peer address on the ISP end?
On May 18, 2013 8:15 AM, "akurenath" wrote:
> Hi nanog,
>
> I have a fortigate 60c connecting a vpn tunnel to an asa 5505. I have the
> connection setup, but it will not connect because unfortunately the isp at
> the fortigate end decided to give u
Hi Guys,
Sorry to see this come up again. We are no announcing the prefix in
question. I am happy to work with you to investigate.
dh_admin@gar-bdr-01> show route advertising-protocol bgp 206.223.143.122
inet.0: 447113 destinations, 1801741 routes (447105 active, 8 holddown, 0
hidden)
Prefix
I think Radware has to sit inline. I do not believe they offer BGP offramp,
so keep that in mind.
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:39 AM, Jay Coley wrote:
> +1 for Radware
>
> On 31/01/2013 18:36, dennis wrote:
> > Agreed, my shortlist for evaluation would include Arbor, Radware and
> > Genie NRM.
--
Best Regards,
Kenneth McRae
*Director, Network Operations*
kenneth.mc...@dreamhost.com
Ph: 818-447-2589
www.dreamhost.com
some community. Bgp router set next-hop for this prefix to /dev/null
> >
> > Normal traffic via bgp router is about 1G/s in and 10G/s out
> >
> > What is worth of looking and what you suggest ?
> >
> > thanks for help,
> > Piotr
> >
> >
>
> --
&
t at 2013-01-11 8:54 AM
> Kenneth McRae wrote:
> > Thanks for that info Andree. The only valid peer I see on the list
> > would be HE. We do not peer with any of the others listed.
>
> Could it be these ASns receive your routes via an IX route-server?
>
> Below some
Thanks for that info Andree. The only valid peer I see on the list would
be HE. We do not peer with any of the others listed.
Kenneth
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 8:46 AM, Andree Toonk wrote:
> Hi,
> Here's a quick summary of what we saw at BGPMon.net.
>
> At 2013-01-11 14:14:13 we saw announcemen
n 2013, Kenneth McRae wrote:
>
> Jeff,
>>
>> We are not announcing the prefix in question nor do we peer with AS42861.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> Kenneth McRae
>> *Director, Network Operations*
>> kenneth.mc.
my description for B AS10912
> INTERNAP-BLK Internap Network Services B AS10913 INTERNAP-BLK Internap
> Network Services B AS12989 HWNG Eweka Internet Services B.V. B AS36351
> SOFTLAYER Technologies Inc. B AS42861 PRIME-LINE-AS Dummy description for
>
>
> On 1/11/2013 10:42 AM,
Jeff,
We are not announcing the prefix in question nor do we peer with AS42861.
--
Best Regards,
Kenneth McRae
*Director, Network Operations*
kenneth.mc...@dreamhost.com
Ph: 818-447-2589
www.dreamhost.com
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 7:23 AM, Jeff Kell wrote:
> Not sure how widespread th
I see major privacy issues with this. Why introduce more intelligence
which WILL eventually be used for more intrusion into the private lives of
all of us? I don't particularly care for "smart" ads and three like..
On Nov 24, 2012 9:37 AM, "Ammar Salih" wrote:
> Dears, I've proposed a new IPv6
for NAT should be explored.
>
> --RB
>
--
Best Regards,
Kenneth McRae
*Sr. Network Engineer*
kenneth.mc...@dreamhost.com
Ph: 323-375-3814
www.dreamhost.com
I have performed micro code upgrades using ISSU on the Juniper platform.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Kasper Adel wrote:
> What i was asking is full ISSU, even with micro code. I assume between
> Major release there will be microcode upgrade most of the time.
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 2:48
rotocol
> running between the two REs(like Graceful Switchover on Juniper gear).
>
>
> On 11/09/2012 01:42 AM, Kenneth McRae wrote:
>
>> Juniper also offers it on the EX virtual switching platform. Works if you
>> have the correct version of JunOS.
>>
>> On Thu
Juniper also offers it on the EX virtual switching platform. Works if you
have the correct version of JunOS.
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Zaid Ali wrote:
> Cisco Nexus platform does it pretty well so they have achieved it.
>
> Zaid
>
> On Nov 8, 2012, at 3:22 PM, Kasper Adel wrote:
>
> > Hel
ions -- even if throughput and latency aren't as great. If
> anyone out there knows of any *copper* 10 gig-t switches (48 port?), I'd be
> interested to hear your experiences. I can't seem to find any high-density
> ones from major vendors.
>
> Thanks,
> Andreas
>
No I am speaking about my previous positons with large providers, telco,
etc.
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Jonathan Lassoff wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Kenneth McRae <
> kenneth.mc...@dreamhost.com> wrote:
>
>> I have never provided the names of end use
required for several years. Utilization information and proper
> justification.
>
> If you are seeking an ISP allocation, then, reassignment (customer)
> information is
> in fact part of that utilization information.
>
> Owen
>
> On Apr 25, 2012, at 8:22 AM, Kenneth M
> will justify a direct allocation.
>
> Then, you can renumber into your new space and be totally independent.
>
> Cheers,
> jof
>
>
--
Best Regards,
Kenneth McRae
*Sr. Network Engineer*
kenneth.mc...@dreamhost.com
Ph: 323-375-3814
www.dreamhost.com
45 matches
Mail list logo
