On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 8:36 PM, John Musbach wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Christopher Morrow
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Christopher Morrow
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:46 PM, John Musbach
>>> wrote:
>>>
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:37 PM, Christopher Morrow
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Christopher Morrow
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:46 PM, John Musbach wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm a techie that recently moved to South Jers
On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Christopher Morrow
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:46 PM, John Musbach wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm a techie that recently moved to South Jersey for a tech job. To my
>> astonishment, I discovered that there appears to be a Ver
Hello,
I'm a techie that recently moved to South Jersey for a tech job. To my
astonishment, I discovered that there appears to be a Verizon
datacenter near my house that has colocation:
http://imgur.com/a/PdGno
It's in Somers Point, NJ. While I could not find an address on the
building, it is on
n a couple years time), and to that we can add WiMAX and
> even the 3G/3.5G HSPDA type wireless. The prices will not be USD19.99 but
> for
> less than USD70/month it is quite possible to get reasonable high speed
> Internet
> access. Will it be as fast as GigE to the house? No. But it will certainly
> support
> most web apps. The only challenge is that some of these wireless
> technologies still have
> much higher latency when compared to the wired DSL/cable modem links.
>
> Regards
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Sokolov [mailto:msoko...@ivan.harhan.org]
> Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 4:05 PM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Locations with no good Internet (was ISP in Johannesburg)
>
> Brandon Galbraith wrote:
>
>> http://www.rric.net/
>
> I'm very familiar with those folks of course, they've been an inspiration
> to me for a long time.
>
> However, my needs are different. RRIC's model basically involves a
> specific community with a well-defined boundary: bring the bandwidth
> into the community via a bulk feed, then sublet inside the community.
>
> But I don't have a specific community in mind - I'm trying to develop a
> more generic solution. (The case of my friend who is at 31 kft from a
> Covad-enabled CO is only an example and nothing more.) Again, consider
> a town with a Covad-enabled CO plus an outlying countryside. The people
> in the town proper already have Covad xDSL available to them, and if we
> could stick my SDSL/2B1Q repeater in the middle of some longer loops, it
> would enable the people in the countryside to get *exactly the same*
> Covad (or ISP-X-via-Covad) services as those in the town proper.
>
> My repeater approach would also allow me to stay out of ISP or ISP-like
> business which I really don't want to get into - I would rather just
> make hardware and let someone else operate it. A repeater is totally
> unlike a router, it is not IP-aware, it just makes the loop seem shorter,
> allowing farther-outlying users to connect to *existing* ISPs with an
> already established business structure.
>
> Anyway, I just saw a post on NANOG about an area deprived of "high-speed
> Internet" services and thought I would post my idea in the hope that
> someone would have some ideas that would actually be *helpful* to what
> I'm trying to do. If not - oh well, I'll just put the idea back on the
> dusty shelf in the back of my mind until I'm ready to try presenting it
> to the folks who own the CO-colocated DSLAMs it would have to work with
> - gotta finish a few other things before I open that can of worms in the
> earnest.
>
> MS
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> ___
> NANOG mailing list
> NANOG@nanog.org
> http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog
>
> End of NANOG Digest, Vol 26, Issue 6
>
>
--
Best Regards,
John Musbach
I'm interested in figuring out how dialup ISPs work and have found
plenty of info on dialin server setup but not much on how ISPs allow
multiple clients under one access number, how do they do it?
--
Best Regards,
John Musbach
and I'm sure most others prefer net neutrality to the horrid
alternative you're suggesting
--
Best Regards,
John Musbach
c from illegal pirating???
--
Best Regards,
John Musbach
On Nov 27, 2007 7:03 AM, Jared Mauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Within the next 2 major software releases (Microsoft OS) they're
> going to by default require signed binaries.
Doesn't Mac OS X Leopard do this already?
--
Best Regards,
John Musbach
he past when I was being warned for using a
nickname I would get some staff telling me to stop and I would get
others telling me to ignore the warning and to continue my life as
usual :-/
--
Best Regards,
John Musbach
10 matches
Mail list logo
