On 25/09/12 17:31, Joe Abley wrote:
On 2012-09-25, at 11:49, Olivier CALVANO wrote:
I am looking for an operator that can build a ADSL or SDSL in record time.
I just pulled a 2-metre pair of copper between a modem and a DSLAM in the lab,
and I can ping things. Total elapsed time 12 minutes (
Question about what other service/network providers are doing in
relation to allocation of addresses for websites.
With IPv6 starting to trickle its way in, what is considered the
industry best practise now for IP(v6) addresses bonded to websites. In
the past the standard practise was to have
can help mitigate this risk, which is something the upper
blocks normally adhere too.. but with the lower blocks its in the hands
of the smaller companies and consumers who don't *always* have the same
rigorous standards.
On 17/09/12 14:37, Adrian Bool wrote:
On 17 Sep 2012, at 13:28,
I think people forget how humongous the v6 space is...
Remember that the address space is 2^128 (or
340,282,366,920,938,463,463,374,607,431,768,211,456 addresses) to put
the in perspective (and a great sample that explained to me how large it
was, you will still get 667 quadrillion address per
There are some pretty impressive quotes there to take away ..
>"We are totally convinced that the factors that made IPv4 run out of
addresses will remanifest >themselves once again and likely sooner than
a lot of us might expect given the "Reccomendations" for >"Best
Practice" deployment."
I
I would wholeheartedly agree with this, but I believe its worse than
just that. I used to categorize myself as a full developer, now I'm
slightly ashamed to be tainted with that brush since there's so many
people using the term who don't know the first thing about programming.
It used to be t
6 matches
Mail list logo
