bors as containers come up and go down (since
the IP will likely change). Sure, you could just add neighbor config for
every IP Docker might use, however-- ouch.
Jeff Walter
On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 8:45 AM, Hugo Slabbert wrote:
>
> On Sat 2018-Jun-16 00:51:15 -0500, Jimmy Hess wrote:
>
- I am in operations group which handles networking and systems
- Weebly
- Websites and commerce
- We rule it all: RADIUS, LDAP, DHCP (datacenter only), and DNS
--
Jeff Walter
Senior Operations Engineer
Weebly, Inc
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Matt Freitag wrote:
> All,
>
> I&#
Yes. Give me a moment.
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 2:26 PM, rwebb wrote:
> ​Anyone from weebly.com on here that can contact me off list about a
> possibly phishing site being hosted with you?
> Thanks,Robert Webb
>
As funny as that would be, it would never happen. Cogent thinks they're the
biggest. HE is the biggest (last I checked). HE wants to peer. Cogent wants
HE to pay for transit. Cake reference. Still partitioned.
How do you get them connected? I hate to say it, but it would take a major
shift within
That cake will haunt NANOG until the end of time.
On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 12:01 PM, Alarig Le Lay wrote:
> On Tue Dec 1 14:39:14 2015, Andrew Kirch wrote:
> > Might I suggest cake pleas?
>
> You mean
>
> http://www.datacenterknowledge.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/Hurricane-Cake.jpg
> ?
>
> --
) your best bet is to programmatically update the info on ARIN using
their API. I wouldn't even both emailing SWIP updates if you want to go the
route of automatic updates since I would guess that system will be retired
in favor of the RESTful API.
Jeff Walter
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 1:03 PM,
Having written two looking glasses from scratch (lg.he.net and and internal
one for Weebly) I can tell you it's actually pretty simple. If you're
interested in writing your own I'm happy to pass along pointers to help you.
Jeff
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Hicks, Byron
wrote:
> True.
>
> Ho
I only buy free-ranged packets and you should too.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 3:28 PM, wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Apr 2015 17:18:42 -0400, Sadiq Saif said:
> > Informational of course. :)
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7511
>
> It already has an errata filed. Follow the link. :)
>
It's nice to see someone is using RWHOIS. Back when I wrote the RWHOIS
daemon for HE I spoke with Mark Kosters (one of the authors of RFC 2167). I
wish I still had the emails because at the time he was shocked anyone would
create software for something that no one really uses. I seem to recall him
I think the simple solution here is to query for fewer OIDs to get the
packet size (in both directions) down below the MTU. It'll take more
requests and thus longer, but if that's what solves the problem... well,
that's what solves the problem.
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 7:59 AM, Brian Christopher Raa
We also have a Solid Optics CWDM meter and it does the job quite nicely. It
feels solid (haha...) and is relatively cheap.
--
Jeff Walter
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Neil Davidson wrote:
> We have the Solid Optics DWDM and CWDM power meters. Simple, inexpensive
> and work
ehend the number of support
calls generated by providing CPE with those functions.
--
Jeff Walter
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
o ask the developer.
--
Jeff Walter
Network Engineer
Hurricane Electric, AS6939
<>
illku...@hotmail.com and encourage them to install the previously
mentioned patched server executable to prevent their server from being
used as an attack amplifier.
--
Jeff Walter
Network Engineer
Hurricane Electric
<>
with everything you see. With decent
amplification (15B -> ~500B) and the number of CoD servers in world you
could very easily build up a sizable attack.
--
Jeff Walter
Network Engineer
Hurricane Electric
<>
On 6/8/2011 3:31 PM, fredrik danerklint wrote:
How about that one?
(Please reply to the mailing list only)
You wouldn't be posting to the list... :-)
Received: from [77.105.232.43] (port=53699 helo=fredan-pc.localnet)
by mail.fredan.se with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256)
On 4/1/2011 5:41 AM, Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) wrote:
I was wondering which April 1st this would happen on. Now I know. So if a v6
carrier swallows a v4 datagram does that count as packet loss or tunneling?
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6214/
Depending on whether or not the packet arr
. Perhaps some WD-40 is
in order?
+ H U R R I C A N E - E L E C T R I C +
| Jeff Walter http://www.he.net/ AS6939 Phone 510/580-4108 |
| Network Engineer Colocation, Dedicated Cell 510/771-7036 |
| je...@he.netServers, Direct
friend of mine who's on Comcast.
+ H U R R I C A N E - E L E C T R I C ----+
| Jeff Walter http://www.he.net/ AS6939 Phone 510/580-4108 |
| Network Engineer Colocation, Dedicated Cell 510/771-7036 |
| je...@he.netServers, Direct Connec
Ric Moseley wrote:
Does anyone know of a tool/script that can aggregate subnets feed to it
via command line? Meaning if I give it multiple /30s (or any size
subnet) it will scrunch them together.
Here is a Perl script to do just that. My normal one reads from STDIN.
#!/usr/bin/perl
use Net
20 matches
Mail list logo
