Zimbra
Jason Bertoch
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Eric Kuhnke
Sent: Wednesday, June 8, 2016 9:06 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Webmail / IMAPS software for end-user clients in 2016
If you had to put up a public facing webmail interface
Now it's CNN
/Jason
-Original Message-
From: Kyle Creyts [mailto:kyle.cre...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 1:55 PM
To: Operations Dallas
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Heads-Up: GoDaddy Broke the Interwebs...
No DDoS or Anonymous attack appears to have been involved.
On 3/30/2012 5:55 PM, John Levine wrote:
I thought it should have died when pr0n and
w4rez took it over (in the late 90's)..
Many of the tech groups remain quite healthy. I still moderate
comp.compilers which gets about 100 posts/month.
Actually, it's fine with us
On 2/27/2012 7:53 PM, William Herrin wrote:
I think you're more likely to find a network engineer with (possibly limited)
> programming skills.
I wish. For the past three months I've been trying to find a network
engineer with a deep TCP/IP protocol understanding, network security
expertise, so
On 6/10/2011 10:53 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
I would like to see both protocols made optionally complete, so, in addition
to fixing DHCPv6 by adding routing information options, I'd also like to
see something done where it would be possible to add at least DNS
servers to RA.
+1.
/Jason
On 5/9/2011 1:54 PM, goe...@anime.net wrote:
Reports sent via E-Mail will not be processed.
Those are considered authorization to block by CIDR, as needed, here.
No need to advise the already-unwilling recipient.
/Jason
On 3/14/2011 2:13 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 12:35:27 EDT, David Miller said:
Define "contacts don't work properly".
- Email / phone number does not exist?
- Email / phone was answered by unhelpful person?
Somewhere between these two should be "email/phone number ex
On 2011/03/12 8:51 AM, Deric Kwok wrote:
Hi
ls there any program/way to monitor the switch port/switch status when
it reaches to certain bandwidth?
Cacti with Threshold plugin
--
/Jason
On 2011/03/11 3:51 PM, ann kok wrote:
ping6 -I eth0 fe80::20c:29ff:fe3c:92a1
connect: Cannot assign requested address
Maybe duplicate address detection? Are you statically assigning this
address? Have you checked your kernel log?
--
/Jason
On 2011/03/11 3:36 PM, ann kok wrote:
What is this meaning?
ping6 -l eth0 fe80::20c:29ff:fe3c:92a1
ping: bad preload value, should be 1..65536
That was a capital "i" not a lower case "L". man ping6
--
/Jason
On 2011/03/11 3:19 PM, ann kok wrote:
Thank you. I try your way. the ipv6 address is on eth0 interface.
I try to run ping6 the fe80::20c:29ff:fe3c:92a1%eth0
lt is same problem!
Try ping6 -I eth0 fe80::20c:29ff:fe3c:92a1
--
/Jason
- Original Message -
> From: "George Bonser"
>
> I could buy that if it weren't for the fact that it took two days to
> come back with that answer. An off the cuff "wow, nobody has ever
> asked me that before, I need to check on it" would have been
> understandable for a new rep. Two days
On 2011/02/09 2:44 PM, Jens Link wrote:
IPv6 for some ISPs will be extraordinarily painful because of legacy
> layer 2 gear
I don't feel sorry for them. We know that IPv6 is coming for how long?
15years? 10year? 5years? Well if you only read the mainstream media you
should have read something a
On 2010/12/07 11:39 AM, Gavin Pearce wrote:
How many of you (honestly) actively manage and respond to abuse@ contact
details listed in WHOIS? Or have had any luck with abuse@ contacts in
the past? Who's good and who isn't?
I answer our abuse@ address and file reports daily. I get automated
re
On 11/11/2010 8:41 PM, Leo Bicknell wrote:
I've run into a number of low end CPE situations lately where I
haven't found anything that does what I want, but I have to believe
it is out there. I'm hoping NANOG can help.
Basically think about a sophisticated home user, or a 1-5 person
small offic
On 2010/10/06 11:36 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
Well, anyway, here's three more hijacked blocks that they (AS6517)
are routing. This is in addition to the 75 such blocks I've already
reported. (I guess that makes 78 hijacked blocks for them, in total.)
Out of curiosity, are you also report
On 2/17/2010 5:32 PM, Laczo, Louis wrote:
Folks,
I'm looking for comments / suggestions / opinions from any providers that have
been contacted by spamhaus about excessive queries originating from their DNS
resolvers, typically, as a proxy for customers. I know that certain large DNS
providers
Xaver Aerni wrote:
Dec 31 10:12:37 linux-1ij2 named[14306]: too many timeouts resolving
'XXX.YYY.ZZZ/A' (in 'YYY.ZZZ'?): disabling EDNS
Do you have a firewall in front of this server that limits DNS packets
to 512 bytes?
Paul Bennett wrote:
At home, I currently run two DSL lines. Right now, we just have two
separate LANs, one connected to each line, with my wife's devices
attached to one, and my devices attached to the other. For a while now,
I've been thinking about setting up a load-balancing routing soluti
Ted Hardie wrote:
But I think the key question is actually different. Look at this
text in RFC 2821:
If one or more MX RRs are found for a given
name, SMTP systems MUST NOT utilize any A RRs associated with that
name unless they are located using the MX RRs; the "implicit MX" rule
Tony Finch wrote:
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009, Jason Bertoch wrote:
Isn't the fundamental problem that SMTP can fall back to an implicit MX?
None of these solutions will stop spammers from skipping MX records and
using direct-to-host connections.
This has nothing to do with spam.
For the OP i
Ted Hardie wrote:
Silly question: how well would using 1.0.0.257.in-addr.arpa match the
need identified in draft-jabley-sink-arpa ?
It seems like it would be equally well guaranteed to be non-existant
(short of change in the def of IPv4 and in-addr.arpa). Like
sink.arpa, it would get you a vali
Chris Gotstein wrote:
We've been getting more and more requests for ESPN360 from our
customers. From what i understand, ESPN requires that the ISP
"subscribe" to their content and pay a fee to do so. I have been unable
to find much information on what it takes to subscribe and what the fees
are
Justin Shore wrote:
Michiel Klaver wrote:
I would suggest to report that netblock to SpamHaus to have it
included at their DROP list, and also use that DROP list as extra
filter in addition to your bogon filter setup at your border routers.
The SpamHaus DROP (Don't Route Or Peer) list was spe
Michael Ruiz wrote:
Group,
I am stuck like chuck. We are unable to activate a VPN
in one of the virtual firewall context. Under the crypto commands, none
of the IP-sec are available. Any help on this would be appreciated.
Version we running is 8.0(4)
Isn't VPN only av
We're considering adding a Verizon connection to our network in Florida,
so I've been looking unsuccessfully for a map of Verizon's fiber network
in the southeast to verify that I'll have diverse paths with my other
providers. Does anyone know if such a map exists in a public location?
Bailey Stephen wrote:
I am looking to monitor the number of active IPSEC tunnels terminating
in a given VRF via SNMP
Vpn#show crypto mib ipsec flowmib global vrf test-vrf
vrf test-vrf
Active Tunnels: 2
...
Is there anyway I can get this ActiveTunnels value v
Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
That said most of the larger players already attend MAAWG - that
leaves rural ISPs, small universities, corporate mailservers etc etc
that dont have full time postmasters, and where you're more likely to
run into this issue.
I've found the opposite to hold true mo
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Kennedy [mailto:akenn...@cyberlinktech.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2009 4:41 PM
> To: NANOG
> Subject: Re: ISP best practices
>
> ...When combined with Webmin (www.webmin.com),
Jason A. Bertoch
Network Administrator
ja...@electronet.net
Electronet B
> -Original Message-
> From: J. Oquendo [mailto:s...@infiltrated.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 3:36 PM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Level3 funkiness
>
>
> Anyone else experience sporadic funkiness via
> Level3? I can't even reach the main website from who
> knows how many net
30 matches
Mail list logo
