Warren,
Do SFP+ modules count?
https://www.enetusa.com/455886-b21-enc
https://www.enetusa.com/455883-b21-enc
I have a pair of the multimode versions of this sitting on my desk as I type
this.
Thanks,
--
Jamie Bowden
Senior Computer Network Technologist II
O: +1 703.842.3848
C: +1
a DMZ instead.
In the interest of not putting my house directly on the internet without
protection, I do have all v6 traffic using the FiOS router’s firewall since I’m
not convinced that the Netgear is properly firewalling that traffic due to the
mode.
Thanks,
--
Jamie Bowden
Senior Computer
As much as I hate giving C&P/Bell Atlantic/Verizon praise for anything ever, my
1gb FIOS connection reliably delivers 900+mb/s in both directions any time I
care to test it. Generally, if I can’t fill the pipe it’s the other end’s lack
of available bandwidth.
Thanks,
--
Jamie
From: NANOG On
with were standard 2B+D (BRI), or 23B+D (PRI). I think
the oldest (and weirdest) piece of gear I personally worked on was a Gandalf
ISDN router that was supporting a US Navy site to site connection. Which makes
me a newcomer to The Internet compared to a lot of people on this list, I
> From: NANOG On Behalf Of Naslund, Steve
> Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2018 1:06 PM
> If there was a waiver issued for your ATO, it would have had to have been
> issued by a
> department head or the OSD and approved by the DoD CIO after Director DISA
> provides a
> recommendation and it is m
Jimmy Hess
>
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 9:55 PM, Scott Weeks
> wrote:
> >
> > --- valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> > From: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu
> >
> > On Sun, 22 Jul 2018 00:43:35 +0200, Niels Bakker said:
> > > Fine as a personal exercise, of course. The inability to download
> > > modules
t;removing and replacing cables in neatly dressed bundles because
>equipment changes required a different length/type cable, but sometimes
>that's what you gotta do to keep things neat and tidy.
Go that way really fast. If something gets in your way, turn.
I want my two dollars.
--
Jamie Bowden
Hey!
New message, please read <http://campingmeetingpoint.com/idea.php?hz>
Jamie Bowden
Hey!
New message, please read <http://qlda.onnet.com.vn/walk.php?i>
Jamie Bowden
> From: Bryan Tong
> The final fact is that bash itself is a dirty language that developers hate
> and system administrators love.
Excuse me? I've been administering systems for over twenty years now and I
can't say that I've ever even once chosen to use bash over any alternative; no
matter h
> From: David Conrad
> Clearly the right answer here is either .SW or perhaps just .WH (since a
> whisky from a place other than Scotland is obviously just wrong ... :))
I believe the Irish monks who invented the stuff might beg to differ, but
really, we're talking about an oil rich nation being
> Behalf Of Jeff Kell
> Not to mention that PCI compliance requires you are RFC1918 (non-routed)
> at your endpoints, but I digress...
You're not funny. And if you're not joking, you're wrong. We just went over
this on this very list two weeks ago.
Jamie
> From: vinny_abe...@dell.com [mailto:vinny_abe...@dell.com]
> Just ran into that exact problem with Cisco Nexus 2232TM-E FEX's. They only
> do 10Gb/1Gb and won't step down to 100Mb. Couldn't connect some newer
> gear's Ethernet management ports to the management network as a result
> and have to g
> From: Lee Howard [mailto:l...@asgard.org]
> On 12/20/13 7:36 AM, "Jamie Bowden" wrote:
> >> From: Owen DeLong [mailto:o...@delong.com]
> >> I'm almost afraid to ask about the phrase "add-default-route=yes" in the
> >> dhcp-client c
> From: Owen DeLong [mailto:o...@delong.com]
> I'm almost afraid to ask about the phrase "add-default-route=yes" in the
> dhcp-client configuration. That seems wrong on the face of it since you
> should be getting your routing information from RA and not DHCP.
No, no, no, a thousand times no. I'
> From: Ricky Beam [mailto:jfb...@gmail.com]
> On Fri, 25 Oct 2013 08:08:44 -0400, Michael Kehoe
> wrote:
> > As far as I'm aware (someone please correct me if I'm wrong), but Cisco
> > is the only vendor that supports this.
>
> Ascend did as well. I used to backup the MAX-TNT's via snmp.
Made
> From: Saku Ytti [mailto:s...@ytti.fi]
> I got quite a bit of replies from sellers selling me cuSFP, insisting they
> work.
>
> So I'd like to clear up on this. For 10/100 to work on SFP slot, the PHY in
> the host needs to be multirate. Exception is SGMII which supposedly
> supports magic mode
> From: Jeroen Massar [mailto:jer...@massar.ch]
> On 2013-07-02 16:51 , Steven Bellovin wrote:
> > http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/07/ipmi/
> >
> > Capsule summary: watch out!
>
> Indeed! But it is should be logical, as IPMI is supposed to be for OOB
> access right? :)
>
> Anybody not putti
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Weeks [mailto:sur...@mauigateway.com]
> joe...@bogus.com wrote:
> From: joel jaeggli
>
> > That's why I'm trying to follow up on the original question. Is
> > there something similar the global public can use to secure their
>
ot already on the shelf they can get it quick
and their pricing is pretty good.
--
Jamie Bowden(ja...@photon.com)
Sr. Sys. Admin. (703) 243-6613 x3848
Photon Research Associates
1616 Fort Myer Drive, Suite 1000
Arlington, VA 22209
> From: Jay Ashworth [mailto:j...@baylink.com]
> - Original Message -
> > From: "TJ"
> > On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Owen DeLong
> wrote:
> > > "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a 747 full of DLT cartridges."
> > XKCD is all over this: http://what-if.xkcd.com/31/
> > :)
> I ha
> From: Dobbins, Roland [mailto:rdobb...@arbor.net]
> On Apr 2, 2013, at 7:53 AM, Mark Andrews wrote:
> > Such lines are tantamount to extortion especially if the ISP supplies
> commercial grade lines.
> Patrick's talking about consumer broadband access. Such AUP stipulations
> are quite comm
> From: Jared Mauch [mailto:ja...@puck.nether.net]
> On Mar 25, 2013, at 2:04 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> >> From: "Jared Mauch"
> >
> >> Open resolvers pose a security threat.
> >
> > Could you clarify, here, Jared?
> >
> > Do "open DNS customer-resolver/recursive
> From: Shrdlu [mailto:shr...@deaddrop.org]
> On 3/12/2013 4:16 PM, Warren Bailey wrote:
>
> > Contractors with facility clearances? I would find it hard to believe
> > dot gov would run secure circuits to a non secure facility. ;)
>
> The word "Contractor" is usually used to refer to anyone that
> From: Mike A [mailto:mi...@mikea.ath.cx]
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 04:41:42PM +, Warren Bailey wrote:
> > Not to mention, the KG units are dot government only.. For obvious
> reasons.
> Erm ... yesandno. Lots of defense contractors have one end of a secured
> circuit. Been there, installed-
> From: Eugeniu Patrascu [mailto:eu...@imacandi.net]
> Comcast's customers send money to Comcast in order to receive whatever
> they
> want from other networks. With that money, Comcast should invest in
> infrastructure so that it's network is not saturated anymore. Isn't this
> how IPSs work ? :
> From: Warren Bailey [mailto:wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com]
> If you are doing DS0 splitting on the DACS, you'll see that on the
> other
> end (it's not like channelized CAS ds1's or PRI's are difficult to look
> at
> now) assuming you have access to that. If the DACS is an issue, buy t
> From: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu [mailto:valdis.kletni...@vt.edu]
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 09:03:31 -0500, William Herrin said:
> > On the technical side, enterprises have been doing large-scale NAT
> for
> > more than a decade now without any doomsday consequences. CGN is not
> > different.
> Corp
> From: Mikael Abrahamsson [mailto:swm...@swm.pp.se]
> On Sat, 12 Jan 2013, Matthew Petach wrote:
>
> > Thank goodness ethernet never has problems with negotiation going
> awry,
> > and coming up with mismatched duplexes, and vendors never had to
> > implement "no negotiation-auto" in their config
> From: Warren Bailey [mailto:wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com]
> I'm shocked there hasn't been a whisper of amphenol. As an rf guy, I
> vote all connectors move to sma or bnc. I can then justify the cost of
> a Walmart 10 foot cable for 25 dollars.. And if we gold plate them, we
> can char
it hard to believe those
folks don't have use for a list like this.
--
Jamie Bowden(ja...@photon.com)
Sr. Sys. Admin. (703) 243-6613 x3848
Photon Research Associates, Inc.
1616 Fort Myer Drive, Suite 1000
Arlington, VA 22209
> -Original Message-
> From
> From: Otis L. Surratt, Jr. [mailto:o...@ocosa.com]
> As Owen mentioned saying "human" seems okay and true but then again,
> because it's not the norm it raises some question. (Internal thinking
> process, "Oh I'm a HUMAN, well I that is true" then your
> temperature gets back to normal) :)
> Justin M. Streiner
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2012, TJ wrote:
>
> > My understanding, and experience (albeit with Android), is that all
> VZW LTE
> > is IPv6-capable.
> >
> > I'd love to hear if Apple or VZW is at fault here, or if something
> weird is
> > happening ...
>
> I don't know about Apple devi
> From: Eric Wieling [mailto:ewiel...@nyigc.com]
> The garbage bags have been on that pole for at least 6+ months.
>
> What will end up happening is what happens every time something like
> this happens. We call in trouble tickets for months until we can get
> the issue labeled chronic, then we
What's an order of magnitude between friends?
Very occasionally yours,
--
Jamie Bowden(ja...@photon.com)
Sr. Sys. Admin. (703) 243-6613 x3848
Photon Research Associates, Inc.
1616 Fort Myer Drive, Suite 1000
Arlington, VA 22209
> -Original Message
> From: Michael R. Wayne [mailto:wa...@staff.msen.com]
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:44:44AM +, Jamie Bowden wrote:
> > While MS may be a favorite whipping boy, let's not pretend that if
> > the dominant OS were Apple or some flavor of *nix, things would be any
>
Apologies for lack of attribution beyond the first level, but the previous
poster removed that.
> From: Keith Medcalf [mailto:kmedc...@dessus.com]
>
> > Windows security sucks.
>
> The real problem with Windows is that there exist folks who believe
> that it is, or can be, secured. They believ
> From: Christopher Morrow [mailto:morrowc.li...@gmail.com]
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Randy Carpenter
> wrote:
> >
> > Not only does Verizon *not* have IPv6 on their LTE network, they also
> do *not* have IPv4, except for double-NATed rfc1918 crap that changes
> your IP address every cou
erver role is separated out and can
exist across multiple hosts and locations. Management can be done from any
approved host running the management console software. Tivoli and Legato are
pretty similar feature, functionality, and being expensive, though I wouldn't
wish Legato on anyone.
> From: Joe Greco [mailto:jgr...@ns.sol.net]
> I'd have to say that that's been the experience here as well, ECC is
> great, yes, but it just doesn't seem to be something that is
> "absolutely
> vital" on an ongoing basis, as some of the other posters here have
> implied, to correct the constant
> From: William Herrin [mailto:b...@herrin.us]
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Robert E. Seastrom
> wrote:
> > Jimmy Hess writes:
> >
> >> Seems like a waste for VZ not to reclaim it so it can be
> >> recycled/put to good use.
> >
> > To put some numbers with this statement (which I agree w
William Herrin [mailto:b...@herrin.us]
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> > On Feb 27, 2012, at 12:02 PM, Brandt, Ralph wrote:
> >> Generalists are hard to come by these days.
> >
> > I think you're more likely to find a network engineer with (possibly
> limited)
> > programm
I don't care for the Actiontec boxes either, but the STB program guides and
other features don't work without it, so I have mine forward all IP traffic
unmolested to my own as the DMZ host (thus the dual layer of [P|N]AT you see).
It's just UDP/TCP 53 traffic that's not flowing for whatever rea
Any Verizon techs around today? I don't know why you can't pass DNS traffic
this morning, but it's the second time in as many weeks as it has been an
issue, and it's rather annoying (Google is the example, but the exact same
failure happens using any destination, on VZ's own or any other publi
> -Original Message-
> From: Jimmy Hess [mailto:mysi...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 11:14 AM
> To: Ray Soucy
> Cc: NANOG
> Subject: Re: IPv6 prefixes longer then /64: are they possible in
DOCSIS
> networks?
>
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Ray Soucy wrote:
> > Sa
> -Original Message-
> From: Owen DeLong [mailto:o...@delong.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 11:11 AM
> To: William Herrin
> Cc: NANOG
> Subject: Re: Have they stopped teaching Defense in Depth?
>
>
> On Nov 15, 2011, at 2:01 PM, William Herrin wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 20
> -Original Message-
> From: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu [mailto:valdis.kletni...@vt.edu]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 9:02 AM
> To: Jay Ashworth
> Cc: NANOG
> Subject: Re: Have they stopped teaching Defense in Depth?
>
> On Wed, 16 Nov 2011 08:36:21 EST, Jay Ashworth said:
> > -
AM, Jay Ashworth
wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> >> From: "Jamie Bowden"
> >
> >> Someday either Google or Apple will get
> >> off their rear ends and roll out an end to end encrypted service
> that
> >> plugs into corporate em
You are correct. The BES uses PSKs to talk to RIM's servers, which then
uses them to talk to the devices over the carrier networks. All of this
was in complete failure mode until sometime overnight when it appears to
have all started flowing again. Someday either Google or Apple will get
off the
> From: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu [mailto:valdis.kletni...@vt.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2011 12:15 AM
>
> On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 05:32:04 +0200, Randy Bush said:
>
> > you left out one connection via a chevy full of hollerith cards and
> the
> > second a canoe full of 7 track tape in water
Owen wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Owen DeLong [mailto:o...@delong.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 9:58 PM
> To: William Herrin
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: IPv6 end user addressing
>
>
> On Aug 10, 2011, at 6:46 PM, William Herrin wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011
You don't have to use bridge mode for this (and the Actiontec router VZ
supplies with FiOS is capable of doing bridge mode, but unless you jump through
some fairly esoteric hoops, doing so breaks the guide and VOD, trust me on
this...oh and you have to jump through them every time you reset the
Oh please, you know practical, operational, and security concerns mean nothing
next to the beauty and purity of the perfect network protocol design.
Jamie
-Original Message-
From: Jay Ashworth [mailto:j...@baylink.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2011 3:56 PM
To: NANOG
Subject: Re: dynami
Jamie
-Original Message-
From: Harry Hoffman [mailto:hhoff...@ip-solutions.net]
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 8:00 AM
To: Jamie Bowden; 'NANOG list'
Subject: RE: IPv6 day fun is beginning!
I have the same setup as you, except a Linux box that does the
firewalling.
The actiontec is
Message-
From: Jeroen Massar [mailto:jer...@unfix.org]
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 7:52 AM
To: Jamie Bowden
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: IPv6 day fun is beginning!
On 2011-Jun-08 13:40, Jamie Bowden wrote:
> Thanks to HE's tunnel broker service, I've got fully functional dual
&g
Thanks to HE's tunnel broker service, I've got fully functional dual
stack at home (well, mostly, like most folks, VZ gives me a single
address and I live behind that with NATv4, but otherwise, I loves me
some FiOS) and yesterday went by for me without a hitch, including
accessing Facebook (I'd hea
I'm looking for people's experiences with Voltaire switches in general
and the Vantage 6048 in particular.
We'd like to use a central switch and use 16 10g ports trunked via LACP
to two other switches and a SAN (to clarify, the central switch would
have three data channels, each one consisting
I know you're having fun with him, but I think what the original poster
had in mind was more like thinking of a file as just a string of
numbers. Create an equation that generates that string of numbers, send
equation, regenerate string on other end. Of course, if it was that
easy, someone would
Does anyone really believe MS is this naïve? I have no doubt at all that some
small bit of Nortel will be transferred to MS if that's what's required for the
IPs in question to be moved in accordance with normal standards, practice, and
policy.
Jamie
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Ka
It would help if we weren't shipping the routing equivalent of the pre
DNS /etc/hosts all over the network (it's automated, but it's still the
equivalent). There has to be a better way to handle routing information
than what's currently being done. The old voice telephony guys built a
system that
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 10:39 AM
To: NANOG
Subject: Re: Using IPv6 with prefixes shorter than a /64 on a LAN
On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 08:11, Jamie Bowden wrote:
> Our classified networks aren't ever going to be connected to anything
> but themselves either, and they need sane
I don't mean to rain on your parade here...oh wait, yeah, I do actually.
I have an SGI Indigo (MIPS R3000/25 with 32MB RAM baby, it's a
screamer!) that still runs with no problems. Show me an eighteen year
old router that's still up and running. The Dell hardware we ran NT4
Server on for providin
Our classified networks aren't ever going to be connected to anything
but themselves either, and they need sane local addressing. Some of
them are a single room with a few machines, some of them are entire
facilities with hundreds of machines, but none of them are going to be
talking to a router o
Our Corporate Overlords run DNS on a mixed environment of Windows and
Other (mostly other). Back when we were still a small company, we moved
our DNS from BIND to Windows for ease of administration. It CAN be
done, but it's a huge PITA since AD does things in DNS that aren't
standard (and in fact
I was thinking more along the lines of the fact that I pay for access at home,
my employer pays for access here at work, and Google, Apple, etc. pay for
access (unless they've moved into the DFZ, which only happens when it's
beneficial for all players that you're there). Why should we pay extra
Forgive the top posting, but Lookout is the corporate standard.
Now, on to the topic at hand. Why would you scan the address space in
the first place? Wouldn't it be easier to compromise a known host and
look at the ARP table? Or better yet, the router on the edge? If it's
moving packets, some
You forgot the clip board. Without the clip board, no one will believe
it.
J
-Original Message-
From: Andy Ringsmuth [mailto:andyr...@inebraska.com]
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 1:52 PM
To: Daryl G. Jurbala
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Outside plant protection, fiber cuts, interwebz
The main telephone room in every commercial tower I've ever had the
displeasure of spending any time in was a disaster. I love how the
circuits all use the same color wiring between the 100 pair 66 blocks
that were so covered in crud that just touching them would turn your
fingers black.
The clos
Five things? Really? My DHCP server hands out the following things to
its clients:
Default Route
DNS Servers
Log host
Domain Name (or, our case, the sub-domain for the office)
NIS Domain
NIS Servers
NTP Server
WINS Servers
SMTP Server
POP Server
NNTP Server
Domain suffix search orders.
All thes
ow one of these security nitwits
justifies it. It's the SAME piece of software answering the query
either way.
Jamie Bowden
--
"It was half way to Rivendell when the drugs began to take hold"
Hunter S Tolkien "Fear and Loathing in Barad Dur"
Iain Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTE
d at
the beginning, we have several coming in...) because they aren't all at
the same classification level (which is why they have strictly
controlled gateways between them).
Jamie Bowden
--
"It was half way to Rivendell when the drugs began to take hold"
Hunter S Tolkien "Fear and Loathing in Barad Dur"
Iain Bowen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
can't join even if they were willing since they're running
consumer machines with XP Home on them, you can't force them to use your
local server.
Jamie Bowden
--
"It was half way to Rivendell when the drugs began to take hold"
Hunter S Tolkien "Fear and Loathing in
72 matches
Mail list logo
