Re: .bv ccTLD

"John Levine" writes: > It appears that Jay R. Ashworth said: > >Well, sure, but with the copper deposit measured in double-digit billions, > >it seems sane to assume they've got a plan there... > > It's been 30 years. We can hope but I wouldn't hold my breath. > > >Though given .TV's b

Re: .bv ccTLD

"Jay R. Ashworth" writes: > - Original Message - > > From: "David Conrad" > > > Jay, > > > > On Dec 3, 2021, at 4:46 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote: > >> In general I could I understand that, but it is my understanding that the > >> domain > >> is still marked reserved at the Secreta

Re: .bv ccTLD

David Conrad writes: > Jay, > > On Dec 3, 2021, at 4:46 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote: > > In general I could I understand that, but it is my understanding that = > the domain is still marked reserved at the Secretariat, > > Sorry, which secretariat? I'm curious about that secretariat as well.

Re: .bv ccTLD

Sabri Berisha writes: > - On Dec 3, 2021, at 2:45 PM, Jay R. Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote: > > Hi, > > > NORID might try to make a case that BV is the common corporate abbreviation > > in their political subdivision... > > Same for .nl. Most people on this list will be familiar wi

Re: Submitting Fake Geolocation for blocks to Data Brokers and RIRs

Brian Turnbow via NANOG writes: > If the address space is unassigned I'm not sure as it is not listed in the > file of allocations that contains the country , but I would guess NL as the > RIPE country of record. I seem to remember they use ZZ for unknown geographical area. jaap

Re: New ICANN registrant change process

David Conrad writes: > > > But I would agree it is much easier to simply blame ICANN. > Yeah, I always blame ICANN for the bad weather :-). jaap

Re: DNSSEC and ISPs faking DNS responses

"Roland Dobbins" writes: > On 14 Nov 2015, at 14:32, Jaap Akkerhuis wrote: > > > There is now a push to forbid the sales of these thingies. > > A push to forbid the sale of Raspberry Pis, of VPNs, or of both? > No, a push on devices which allow access to

Re: DNSSEC and ISPs faking DNS responses

"Roland Dobbins" writes: > On 14 Nov 2015, at 10:22, Owen DeLong wrote: > > By a tiny minority of people. > > Selection bias. > > Most people do not know what a 'VPN' is, or how to install one and get > it working. Most people don't need to know. They just buy a cheap (EUR 50 or so s

Re: Scotland ccTLD?

> On Sep 16, 2014, at 8:45 AM, Rubens Kuhl wrote: > > Available s* include sf, sp, sq, su and sw. One really should to consult and before making these kind of assumptions. jaap

Re: Scotland ccTLD?

Jay Ashworth writes: > I know that IANA bases its list of ccTLDs on the 3166 list. > > Does anyone know if the 3166 secretariat has a preliminary choice in > mind? It hasn't. > I see press coverage of ".scot", but of course that's not > germane. That is a gTLD at best, not an alpha-2 I

Re: [dns-wg] crave your indulgence

If you wouldn't mind a quick tracerooute - Can you confirm reachability to the following: 2001:500:84::b Thanks in advance. traceroute6 to 2001:500:84::b (2001:500:84::b) from 2a04:b900::1:0:0:15, 64 hops max, 12 byte packets 1 office.bijgepunt.nlnetlabs.nl 0.33

Re: list all the domains under a specific nameserver?

On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 6:34 PM, John Conner wrote: > Just curious, is there any way for someone to pull all the domains being > registered under a given domain register? I have seen websites like > http://www.dailychanges.com which does this type of thing and would like

Re: IP Fragmentation - Not reliable over the Internet?

Christopher Palmer wrote: > > What is the probability that a random path between two Internet hosts > will traverse a middlebox that drops or otherwise barfs on fragmented > IPv4 packets? This question is important for large EDNS packets so you'll find some recent

Re: Problems getting to Verisign's whois server on IPv6

Anyone else having problems getting to Verisign's whois server on IPv6? whois -h 2001:503:ff39:1060::74 verisign-grs.com works for me. jaap

Re: antisocial security

and, i noticed the problem because i can not get to the web site at http://www.ssa.gov/ from tokyo. Lot's of .gov web sites are not available outside (at least what somebody thinks is outside) the US. jaap

Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs

(Marka) See RFC 1535. Yes, a mistake was made implementing search lists. A RFC was issued to say don't do search lists this way. Which RFC? What way? It would be nice if you would say what you mean instead keep referring to things the reader has to guess. jaap

Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs

Simple hostnames as, global identifiers, were supposed to cease to work in 1984. Can you point out where that is stated? jaap

Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs

Which is your choice. Lots of others want search lists. I've seen requests for 20+ elements. So they get what they ask for: Ambiguity in resolving the name space. jaap

Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs

(Mark:) Which just means we need to write yet another RFC saying that resolvers shouldn't lookup simple host names in the DNS. Simple host names should be qualified against a search list. I don't see the problem. I'm happily running with a empty search list for the last 2

Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs

And no, I had not heard *any noise* that anyone was seriously considering this up until this announcement. Overhere it got mentioned in the local news paper a couple of times. jaap

Re: Tools for teaching users online safety

Also the FTC has set up a comprehensive site to protect kids, including a guide for parents on kid's use of social networks. http://www.onguardonline.gov/ Other places to look are http://www.safeinternet.org/ and http://www.saferinternet.org/. Yes, these are different organis

Re: What is "The Internet" TCP/IP or UNIX-to-UNIX ?

It was, for at least some versions (V2 and later?), if the intermediate site(s) allowed execution of the uucp command. 25 years on the brain is fuzzy on the details ... You could certainly add uux and uux to the list of legal remote commands, but I confess that my memory is a