Hello All,
I am trying to find an example config on how to configure QinQ/802.1ad/PB
on the Brocade MLX8 platform.
I have found some basic examples for PBB/Mac in Mac, but not a complete
config for 802.1ad
Can anyone on the list help?
Thanks!
> Hi,
>
> I've been working on a basic configuration for E-OAM starting with one
> domain. I have CFM working between the PEs (IOS-XR) devices tied to an
> EoMPLS instance, but have a few questions below:
>
> 1) I "think" I should be seeing MIPs in my traceroute when there is a P
> router in betwee
Hi,
I've been working on a basic configuration for E-OAM starting with one
domain. I have CFM working between the PEs (IOS-XR) devices tied to an
EoMPLS instance, but have a few questions below:
1) I "think" I should be seeing MIPs in my traceroute when there is a P
router in between the two PEs,
Hi,
We have a new requirement to load balance across a couple of point to point
ethernet links.
The previous solution was handled by a few TDM circuits and MLPPP so that
traffic was load balanced and any fragmentation/reassembly was handled by
ML/PPP.
Load balancing per flow is not really an opt
Hello,
Looking for feedback/suggestions on a design issue. We have a two ethernet
connections in a port channel between two Cisco routers (ASR1k),
unfortunately we only have one unique flow between traversing the
ether/port channel, so traffic is pinned to just one link.
I'm looking for options i
Hello J-NSP and Nanog members
Hopefully this is the right forum for this discussion - if not my apologies
for further clogging your inbox.
Here it goes:
Would you consider use of JSAM/WSAM to selectively proxy and tunnel certain
applications a form of split tunneling? The traditional concept of
Hi,
I'm doing some research on the Cisco Cloud Web Security offering, also
known as ScanSafe.
Has anyone on the lists explored Cisco's ScanSafe SaaS offering, now called
Cisco Cloud Web Security - as a means of providing protection in the cloud
that would potentially negate the requirement to hav
I had an issue on the 28xx with a static NAT that just stopped working. The
router would not publish the MAC for the nat entry. I removed the NAT entry
and reapplied - and magically it worked again.
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Jack Bates wrote:
> On 1/29/2011 8:47 PM, ML wrote:
>
>> I just
>From my experience - A key thing to consider from any vendor is their
support - Cisco has great support and a large support organization. I've
seen them turn around complex problems very rapidly for their customers.
Additionally, someone already mentioned investment protection and that Cisco
keep
9 matches
Mail list logo