On 09/05/12 09:13 , Michael Thomas wrote:
> The "I" part of DKIM is "Identified". That's all it promises. It's a
> feature, not a bug, that spammers use it.
Which is why DKIM does not really address any concerns. The spammers
have reduced its value.
I am retired now, but do run my own mail serve
On 09/05/12 05:56 , Daniel Taylor wrote:
>> Use DKIM.
> You say that like it's a lower bar than setting up a fixed SMTP server
> and using that.
> Besides, doesn't DKIM break on mailing lists?
Not only that, but a majority of spam I receive lately has a valid DKIM
signature. They are adaptive, li
On 08/01/12 16:22 , Robert Glover wrote:
> We are having issues with getting responses from these servers:
>
> NSMEDCTR1.UCSFMEDICALCENTER.ORG
> NSMEDCTR2.UCSFMEDICALCENTER.ORG
>
> Which are authoritative for "ucsfmedctr.org" and "ucsfmedicalcenter.org".
Those servers respond to my queries fr
On 08/01/12 10:51 , Robert Glover wrote:
> We are not able to query their DNS servers from our network. We've got
> users not able to access anything UCSF due to this.
I am querying them OK. I am in US AZ. I am also able to reach
manana.garlic.com.
[hyperion]/usr/local# dig www.ucsf.edu @uc
4 matches
Mail list logo
