It's working now, thanks all for the assist!
Cheers,
GTG
On Friday, May 11, 2018 18:15 EDT, "Don Fanning" wrote:
Maybe try the team reference in the apache debug of the looking glass server:
dl-systemsandto...@level3.com
-Original Message-
From: NANOG On Behalf Of
I'm seeing issues with Level 3's looking glass
(https://lookingglass.level3.net) since they rolled out the new one with the
CenturyLink branding. Any query results in "Invalid usage. POST variable not
set.". Also, the radio buttons under the "Information Category" selection allow
more than one
list?
Regards,
Stuart Howlette
stu...@stuarthowlette.me.uk On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 11:31 pm, Gary T. Giesen
via NANOG wrote:Can anyone recommend a transit provider in
Bracknell, UK? Not too picky on requirements, but IPv6 is a must; RTBH and
good peering are a very good to have. We're lookin
Can anyone recommend a transit provider in Bracknell, UK? Not too picky on
requirements, but IPv6 is a must; RTBH and good peering are a very good to
have.
We're looking to replace one of our current providers (Virgin Media - AS5089).
I have no problem naming them as they treat prefix list up
Bill I ran into this same issue some time ago.
I had to move my mail off of Gmail for the same reason. In my case it was on a
shared box with people who were not forwarding to Gmail and was causing issues
for them sending to Gmail.
Gmail really needs a "this server is forwarding email to me" se
I have a customer who's trying to decide whether to renew their existing
transit contract or not for a POP they have in the UK and wondering what's
good for transit options out there.
Looking for:
- Good peering/reachability to other networks (I've already started perusing
the LINX peer list)
- D
Another option might be an analog modem + phone line + carrier TAP gateway
(if your carrier(s) has/have one). Might or might not be more
cost-effective.
GTG
> -Original Message-
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Martin
> Hotze
> Sent: September 15, 2015 8:37 AM
>
ement that says it is just supported on 7200, means
> you cannot use a 32bit ASN in production today on any hardware?
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Gary T. Giesen"
> To: "Franck Martin"
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Sent: Sunday, 11 April, 2010 6:36:0
You can still request a 16 bit ASN from the registries, so if this is
a concern for a new deployment you're not out of luck (yet). There is
a compatibility mechanism, so you can still receive routes sourced
from (or passing through) 32 bit ASNs, they will simply appear as AS
23456. Even if you have
I think you misunderstood me. You definitely need prefix filters on
the *provider* side, but the CPE doesn't necessarily need them as the
impact is hopefully limited to that particular customer. They're
always better of course.
GG
On 8/20/09, Daniel Roesen wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 08:47:
FWIW, we use BGP to our multihomed customers (even when we manage the
CPE), using a private AS. OSPF doesn't have the right toolset to
provide protection for inter-network route propogation, and the risk
of some customer's CPE screwing up you routing is just too high to go
naked. A basic CPE BGP co
Another note:
Seeing > 50% packet loss with 605 byte packets or larger. Anything
604 or under and there's zero packet loss. With or without df-bit set.
GG
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Gary T. Giesen wrote:
> Seeing issues with Alter.net in Seattle to a Qwest DSL customer in
>
Seeing issues with Alter.net in Seattle to a Qwest DSL customer in
Portland (and looks like a possible routing loop as well) from
Calgary:
traceroute 63.227.218.201
Type escape sequence to abort.
Tracing the route to 63.227.218.201
1 gw-V4051.bb101-2420-1.cgy.akn.ca (209.90.250.33) 0 msec 0 ms
Note that these addresses are advertised aggregated as a /19 from us
to our peers.
GG
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 4:10 PM, Gary T. Giesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone from Comcast (or anyone know anyone from Comcast) that can
> contact me regarding a routing issue on their
Anyone from Comcast (or anyone know anyone from Comcast) that can
contact me regarding a routing issue on their network? I'm seeing some
weird routing between a customer of mine and a /32 on our network.
Traceroutes from customer site to two adjacent /32's on our network
Working /32
1 * * *
15 matches
Mail list logo
