As seen from Cogent to XO.
http://i.imgur.com/aFyAw1p.png
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 1:56 PM, Mikeal Clark wrote:
> This problem seemed resolved for awhile and now its representing with about
> 7% packet loss.
>
> Looks like someone adjusted the routing a bit at XO.
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 9
I saw the same effect after the Netflix peering started.
http://imgur.com/a/aVFAS
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 10:22 PM, Jason Canady wrote:
> I'm already seeing a huge improvement to Comcast after Netflix moved a lot
> of traffic off of the ports.
>
>
> On Feb 27, 2014, at 22:21, Stephen Frost wro
Curious if anyone else thinks filtering out NTP packets above a certain
packet size is a good or terrible idea.
>From my brief testing it seems 90 bytes for IPv4 and 110 bytes for IPv6 are
typical for a client to successfully synchronize to an NTP server.
If I query a server for it's list of peer
Cogent support uses the same response when inquiring about Comcast,
CenturyLink, Tata, AT&T etc.
If the "Tier 1s" are really keeping each other congested, are they not
creating an environment where you have to buy from each of them to have a
chance at congestion free paths? Or peer around them.
I also see major congestion from Cogent to VZ. Amongst other major
networks.
http://i.imgur.com/1z2ZGOr.png
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Robert Glover wrote:
> Hello,
>
> For the last several months, we have been tracking a congestion issue
> between Cogent <-> Verizon
>
> Host Loss%
Roughly between State College and Harrisburg.
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Charles Mills wrote:
> It's a big state. Which part? Pittsburgh, Philadelphia or some point in
> between?
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 9:41 PM, Edward Roels wrote:
>
>> I'm
I'm looking for rough pricing or even carriers that can provide a 100G wave
in Pennsylvania.
If you have some insight into how pricing scales between 10G and 100G
offerings (e.g. 100G is usually 5-6x the cost of a 10G), I'm also
interested.
Off-list replies are welcome.
Thanks,
Ed
7 matches
Mail list logo
