Re: do not filter your customers

2012-02-25 Thread Dongting Yu
Let me chime in and attempt to explain why a couple of solutions I've seen so far in this thread won't work: - rate-limiting/throttling updates: BGP by protocol does not repeat updates; if an update is sent then the sender assumes that the receiver has received it and will remember it until a chan

Re: A top-down RPKI model a threat to human freedom? (was Re: Level 3's IRR Database)

2011-02-01 Thread Dongting Yu
Since we are already talking about RIRs, I am curious, who will sign the legacy blocks in RPKI? Dongting

Re: Level 3's IRR Database

2011-01-31 Thread Dongting Yu
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 6:17 PM, Andree Toonk wrote: > > Now AS17557 start to announce a more specific: 208.65.153.0/24. Validators > would classify this as Invalid (2). Would it be classified as invalid or unknown? Or are both possible depending on whether 208.65.153.0/24 is signed? Do these two