So what? Just another day in the cyber battlespace, friends.
David
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 6:50 AM, Phil Bedard wrote:
> Have you ever heard of Java and Flash? There is a reason why browsers
> explicitly disable Java, heck OSX removed it from the OS completely.
> Flash will run sandboxed in
Thanks to all for their off-list replies! NANOGers rock
We're in contact with the right people now.
Thanks again,
David
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:42 AM, David Hiers wrote:
> We are aparently being attacked from a server in state.va.us. If
> there is a contact for state.v
We are aparently being attacked from a server in state.va.us. If
there is a contact for state.va.us on the list, please contact me off
list.
Thanks,
David
This little border skirmish is a good reminder that we build and
operate one of the key battlegrounds on which all current and future
wars are, and will be, fought.
David
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 9:08 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian
wrote:
> http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/11/16/internet-tr
VOIP, huh? Check out:
www.voiceops.org
David
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 8:39 AM, James Jones wrote:
> Sorry I meant MBI project not BMI.
>
> On 2/8/10 11:31 AM, James Jones wrote:
>>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> Hi, I have just recently returned to the United States from New
>> Zealand. I have spe
You can completely implement Vijay's most impressive stuff and simply
move the problem to a different level of abstraction.
No matter what you do, it still comes down to some geek banging on
some plastic thingy. I'm as likely to screw up an "Extensible
Entity-Attribute-Relationship" as I am an AC
If your manager pretends that they can manage humans without a few
well-worn human factor books on their shelf, quit.
David
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Michael Dillon
wrote:
>> The actual error happened when someone was troubleshooting a turn-up,
>> where in the past the customer
As long as you raise the level of CAIN (Confidentiality,
Availability, Integrity, Non-Repudiation) that your mission requires
and funding permits, you can do it anywhere you like, with whatever
you like, and call it whatever you like.
David
On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Brian Keefer wrote:
>
Poking the dragon a bit, aren't you? Fun.
If you really look at it, there is no quantitative difference between
statefull and non-statefull. A non-stateful firewall can prevent a
TCP session from entering the SYN_RECEIVED state by blocking the SYN
packet, so it strongly impacts session state wit
> Totally out of the box, but here goes: why don't we run the entire
> Internet management plane "out of band"
This has been one of my favorite conversation-stoppers for years. The
PSTN fought tooth and nail against the need for OOB control, but
2600hz was a problem that they could not solve, so
Send along a capture when you get the chance.
David
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Deric Kwok wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I got the following message.
>
> UDP: bad checksum. From 67.204.26.203:1054 to 66.49.0.97:55290 ulen 43
> UDP: short packet: From 67.55.92.141:23801 30368/46 to 66.49.0.0:24617
>
In general, it seems that a field has to be aware that it can kill (or
has killed) an embarrassing number of people before its members accept
the need for controls such as processes and checklists.
Here's a couple if incidents in which gruesome, public loss of life
was necessary to for thought to
1. I grew up at the local airport watching my CFII pop train an
endless stream of pilots.
2. The checklist for my last production gear swap had over 400 steps
and 4 time/task gates (each with a rollback plan). As I did each
sequence of steps, I called it out, and someone read their copy of the
It is wise to stack the deck in your favor, but you'll never really
know how much real redundancy you've purchased:
http://www.atis.org/ndai/ATIS_NDAI_Final_Report_2006.pdf
David
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 3:41 PM, wrote:
> I suppose I could take the whole resilience thing further and further
We're back up now.
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Wallace Keith wrote:
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher J. Pilkington [mailto:christopher.j.pilking...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 4:01 PM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: BGP or MPLS issue AT&T in New York?
>
>
We're getting weird approachability issues on some of out networks,
losing IP path without BGP changes.
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Christopher J. Pilkington
wrote:
> Anyone notice anything bizarre with AT&T in New York? We had our cage
> at 811 10th Avenue (advertised by AS7018) unreachab
to
> India.
>
> Tatsuya
>
>
> Tatsuya Kawasaki
> 703.469.1311 (24x7)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: David Hiers [mailto:hie...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, October 02, 2009 3:51 PM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Route to 208.71.177.15, 208.71.179.
Is anyone having trouble routing to 208.71.177.15 or 208.71.179.10?
Can't get there from 65.59.112.0/24 in Chicago.
David
If a topic has anything to do with operating a voice network, VoiceOps
is a good place for it.
www.voiceops.org
VoiceOps covers voice over IP, TDM, TSOT, whatever...
David
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Richey wrote:
> I am looking for a CLEC related mailing list. I looked through the ar
> Highly unlikely that 3 years is sufficient time to devise a certification,
No big deal; they could just adopt the CISSP/GIAC cert without
modification as an interim step. Existing certs are already being
used in some court cases:
http://www.wisbar.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Home&TEMPLATE=/CM/C
I guess the precedence for blocking is the way cops can close
airspace, roads, and any piece of property when needed. If you accept
the notion that we've built private and public "roads" and "buildings"
on the "information superhighway", the notion of emergency roadblocks,
crime-scene tape, traffi
Hi,
Is anyone aware of a voip-focused group similar to nanog? Us voip pukes
have to deal with the issues of allocation, routing, and management of phone
numbers as well as networks, and I have not found a voice operators' group
similar to this network operators' group.
Thanks,
David
22 matches
Mail list logo
