Hey!
New message, please read <http://watercleanupteam.com/sat.php?7>
Dave Larter
I (we) use SBG, if you like the Symantec stuff it is much better than
the SMS SMTP product.
-Original Message-
From: Gregory Hicks [mailto:ghi...@hicks-net.net]
Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 2:31 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org; mark.urb...@pnpt.com
Subject: Re: Email filtering and protection
I may be missing a little bit here by jumping a bit in the thread so
sorry.
What is the difference between weather and seasonal?
I define weather like, well its cloudy and raining here and get in the
car and drive 20 minutes and it is clear and sunny. I would call this
mostly localized, like grou
. And yes, voltage will drop while current spikes, thus
tripping the breaker.
-Original Message-
From: Pete Templin [mailto:peteli...@templin.org]
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 10:39 AM
To: Dave Larter
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Why choose 120 volts?
Dave Larter wrote:
> Seems like
The ground is not supposed to carry any current where as the neutral is.
If you tried to carry current on the ground of a CGFI protected circuit
it would trip.
-Original Message-
From: david raistrick [mailto:dr...@icantclick.org]
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 6:30 PM
To: Seth Mattinen
C
Seems like if the c14 was connected to a 240v PDU the 5-15 would deliver
240v to the equipment, arc/pop tripping the breaker on the PDU as soon
as it is connected killing power to everything on that PDU.
Or am I missing something, Also hard to believe it is UL since the c14
is rated 125/250v and w
See:
http://www.3phasepower.org/3phasewiring.htm
-Original Message-
From: Joe Greco [mailto:jgr...@ns.sol.net]
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 8:20 PM
To: Chris Adams
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Why choose 120 volts?
> Once upon a time, Joe Greco said:
> > And I don't like not having
Yes, you are correct Chris. The loss from getting 240 from two legs is
due to the fact that it is at 120 instead of 180 deg's.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Adams [mailto:cmad...@hiwaay.net]
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 7:52 PM
To: Joe Greco
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Why choose 12
I stop at licking the 9v batteries, intentionally, but I have been
burned by 50KV before. Just imagine the copper you could save by just
sending the energy thru the air, but then I guess the DC would sound and
look more like the death star.
-Original Message-
From: Jared Mauch [mailto:ja.
It will be like at Christmas time, trying to find the bad bulb.
-Original Message-
From: Barney Wolff [mailto:bar...@databus.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 4:29 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Why choose 120 volts?
Doesn't even need non-standard servers - just wire them all in ser
Thanks, actually I wasn't addressing the rr connects, no telling what
they are doing/not doing just from the .edu.
-Original Message-
From: Andre Guibert de Bruet [mailto:a...@siliconlandmark.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 7:14 PM
To: Dave Larter
Cc: Polar Humenn; nanog@nano
l.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2009 7:02 PM
To: Dave Larter
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: MX problems
>From my mail log. Geez, I can't even get to Cornell, which is just down
the friggin road! (Yeah, I know, but really).
What is going on?
May 19 18:58:26 greene postfix/smtp[5895
Hi, I have no problem getting there, is that their mx's?
Tracing route to s0.nanog.org [198.108.95.20]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 117 ms 128 ms 115 ms argon.socrdu.net [64.132.109.136]
2 * 122 ms 126 ms 64.132.109.130
3 125 ms 106 ms 124 ms 64.132.109.129
4 1
Yes, obviously it was meant to be 193.169.24.0 - 193.169.25.255
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Hayes [mailto:ryguill...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2009 9:22 PM
To: na...@merit.edu; n...@ripe.net
Subject: Re: Broken RIPE-entry
That would indeed be a very large allocation. :)
On Sa
I agree, running monitoring from my laptop at home at
nights/weekends/vacations/holidays... I need to use most of those ports.
My answer was VNP/tunnel everything.
-Original Message-
From: John Levine [mailto:jo...@iecc.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 6:36 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Cc: r.
I can now get to .com ok, but .net net traces ok but the site doesn't come up
in a browser and tr does work. So they have fixed part of the problem, at last
from here.
C:\Documents and Settings\netman>tracert level3.net
Tracing route to level3.net [4.68.95.11]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1
I don't think you will ever get a "true" answer, maybe someone just
forgot to re-reg the domain ;)
-Original Message-
From: Niels Bakker [mailto:niels=na...@bakker.net]
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 5:13 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Level3 funkiness
* s...@infiltrated.net (J. Oq
Tracing to www.level3.net (4.68.95.28) dies at 4.68.94.1 for me as well.
-Original Message-
From: Andy Vance [mailto:ava...@hq.speakeasy.net]
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 3:55 PM
To: Dave Larter; J. Oquendo; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: Level3 funkiness
I'm not having any issues
Yes, I die on your hop14 with TWTelecom
-Original Message-
From: J. Oquendo [mailto:s...@infiltrated.net]
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2009 3:36 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Level3 funkiness
Anyone else experience sporadic funkiness via
Level3? I can't even reach the main website from
Times out for me as well. Last hop in AU.
8 240 ms 238 ms 239 ms 10.14.254.125.unassigned.comindico.com.au
[125.254.14.10]
-Original Message-
From: Dale Carstensen [mailto:d...@lampinc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 11:45 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Is whois.apnic.ne
Yes, via twtelecom.
-Original Message-
From: S. Ryan [mailto:au...@mind.net]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 3:43 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Trouble reaching plaxo.com?
Anyone else having trouble reaching plaxo.com? Nothing urgent. I can't
seem to get there via Level 3 or via 36
Sorry, and we have the premium spam add-on too.
-Original Message-
From: Charles Wyble [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 2:28 PM
To: Dave Larter
Cc: Revolver Onslaught; nanog
Subject: Re: McColo and SPAM
Is that an off the shelf tool or custom built?
, December 05, 2008 2:28 PM
To: Dave Larter
Cc: Revolver Onslaught; nanog
Subject: Re: McColo and SPAM
Is that an off the shelf tool or custom built?
And delivered spam is about the same too. This is just spam I receive, May was
when I brought our new smtp gateways online.
-Original Message-
From: Revolver Onslaught [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 2:25 PM
To: Dave Larter
Cc: nanog
Subject: Re: McColo and
It is still way down for me, see attached.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Revolver Onslaught [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2008 2:14 PM
To: nanog
Subject: McColo and SPAM
Hello,
Since McColo closed, we noticed the spam was far more intensive than
before.
However
Yes, I did nslookup and got responses but wouldn't come up in my
browser, also to add it seems to be working now.
-Original Message-
From: Kyle Rollin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 3:48 PM
To: Dave Larter; 'Larry Daberko'; nanog@nanog.
Yes, www.yahoo.com is unreachable for me too, but mail.yahoo.com and
login.yahoo.com are up.
-Original Message-
From: Larry Daberko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 3:37 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Yahoo DNS broken?
I am unable to resolve www.yahoo.com.
short time after I started updating. And in my previous
post I meant tremendous drop.
-Original Message-
From: Gadi Evron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 6:36 PM
To: Dave Larter
Cc: Matthew Black; NANOG list
Subject: RE: [funsec] McColo: Major Source of Online
I would agree, a tedious drop. The image is from one of our gateways.
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Black [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 10:56 AM
To: NANOG list
Subject: Re: [funsec] McColo: Major Source of Online Scams
andSpamsKnockedOffline (fwd)
Since Mc
29 matches
Mail list logo
