(alternate solution: rename IPv6 to something media-friendlyish and request
ISPs to enable support for it, advertising that most of their hardware
"*already
supports it*")
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 2:58 PM Cryptographrix
wrote:
> Just to clarify - there's no transition involved
Just to clarify - there's no transition involved - IPv4 to IPv6 is like
going from the VINES protocol to IPv6: IPv6 may as well have been called
"PROTOCOL 493" - it bares very little relation to the original protocol
that brought us the internet as-it-is-today.
The deployment of IPv4 had nothing t
I suspect we should just accept that IPv6 is never actually happening with
all this infighting of its own very vocal proponents.
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 2:49 PM Steve Mikulasik
wrote:
> https://i.imgur.com/LvVHJZf.png
>
> I had to make this, talking about IPv6 or geo-ip in nanog is like throwing
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 10:22 AM Ca By wrote:
>
>
> On Tuesday, June 7, 2016, Cryptographrix wrote:
>
>> As I said to Netflix's tech support - if they advocate for people to turn
>> off IPv6 on their end, maybe Netflix should stop supporting it on their
>> end.
As I said to Netflix's tech support - if they advocate for people to turn
off IPv6 on their end, maybe Netflix should stop supporting it on their end.
It's in the air whether it's just an HE tunnel issue or an IPv6 issue at
the moment, and if their tech support is telling people to turn off IPv6,
And yeah, most every US ISP *can* route IPv6, but they just haven't for
absolutely no reason.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 11:11 PM Cryptographrix
wrote:
> Surely they could - for some reason they haven't.
>
> It's not better - it's desperate.
>
> But it's m
PM Mansoor Nathani
wrote:
> How is this better than getting native IPv6 from a provider? If they are
> willing to run a BGP session with you (that too with a private ASN), surely
> they can offer native IPv6 as well.
>
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:19 PM, Cryptographrix
> wrote:
&g
"Yeah, I'm actually only going to use 6 of them, between all of my phones,
my Roku, and my laptop, but I'll advertise for all 1.2Septillion"
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:21 PM Cryptographrix
wrote:
> "Hello Time Warner?I happen to have 1.2Septillion IPv6 IPs I need
"Hello Time Warner?I happen to have 1.2Septillion IPv6 IPs I need to
advertise"
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 10:19 PM Cryptographrix
wrote:
> "A /48 is officially the smallest"...but apparently smaller gets
> advertised all over, and I imagine esp for private ASNs..
un 3, 2016 at 10:11 PM Cryptographrix
wrote:
> Nope - You'd have the /56 and only people within your /56 (or /64 if you
> sliced it up nicely) would be able to do things with it routed by your ISP.
>
> Of course this means we'll have to get our ISPs to listen for our BGP
> a
ani
wrote:
> Wouldn't the /56 get blocked as soon as Netflix detects multiple accounts
> logging in from the same IPv6 range?
>
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 9:49 PM, Cryptographrix
> wrote:
>
>> This is a good idea. We should do this.
>>
>>
>>
>> On
This is a good idea. We should do this.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 9:48 PM Raymond Beaudoin <
raymond.beaud...@icarustech.com> wrote:
> Make it a /56 each and you've got a deal. Hell, I'll throw in a round of
> drinks.
>
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Cryptograph
ings that will
> >> advertise your IPv6 allocations on your behalf direct to a server in
> their
> >> data centers. It seems pretty tongue-in-cheek, and satisfying, to turn
> >> up a * >> favorite virtual router instance> *and then route through it. The
> Inter
rtual router instance> *and then route through it. The
> Internet is such an amazing place.
>
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 8:15 PM, Cryptographrix
> wrote:
>
>> Yeah I RAWRed to them pretty hard whilst being as understanding to the CS
>> rep that it wasn't their fault.
&
Warner, but they decided to in their wisdom to disable IPv6 service for
> > anyone that has an Arris SB6183 due to an Arris firmware bug. And they
> are
> > taking their sweet time pushing out the fixed firmware update that
> Comcast
> > and Cox seemed to be able to pu
off and it starts to look like a trend,
> it can
> change things.
>
> Owen
>
> > On Jun 3, 2016, at 17:17 , Cryptographrix
> wrote:
> >
> > Very true. Telling people to turn off IPv6 support through their customer
> > service portal is completely infuriatin
bor Networks*
> +1.734.794.5033 (d) | +1.734.846.2053 (m)
> www.arbornetworks.com
>
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Cryptographrix
> wrote:
>
>> I don't remember the source, but I do remember that even with Comcast's
>> deployment, HE still represented the maj
s.com
>
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 7:49 PM, Cryptographrix
> wrote:
>
>> Depends - how many US users have native IPv6 through their ISPs?
>>
>> If I remember correctly (I can't find the source at the moment), HE.net
>> represents something like 70% of IPv6 tr
(and this is coming from someone that has serious issues with IPv6 but
understands that we need to move forward)
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 7:49 PM Cryptographrix
wrote:
> Depends - how many US users have native IPv6 through their ISPs?
>
> If I remember correctly (I can't find the
t's a bit important to me.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 7:45 PM Baldur Norddahl
wrote:
> Den 4. jun. 2016 01.26 skrev "Cryptographrix" :
> >
> > The information I'm getting from Netflix support now is explicitly
> telling
> > me to turn off IPv6 - someone m
The information I'm getting from Netflix support now is explicitly telling
me to turn off IPv6 - someone might want to stop them before they
completely kill US IPv6 adoption.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 7:15 PM Cryptographrix
wrote:
> > "What you are NOT allowed to do is impose new
> "What you are NOT allowed to do is impose new requirements on our
Internet to support your business licensing models and make it our problem"
They're not imposing new regulation on your internet to support their
business licensing models - they're imposing existing (and international)
regulation
ing how badly Netflix VPN detection works and why it is so hard for
> us to help with it and why they should be complaining to Netflix.
>
> Steven Naslund
>
> From: Cryptographrix [mailto:cryptograph...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 03, 2016 5:06 PM
> To: Naslund, Steve; na
e no assurance that it can not use
Wifi to determine your location much more precisely than IP geolocation.
Period.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 6:35 PM Cryptographrix
wrote:
> But wait, content providers *do that.*
>
> *Microsoft too...for illegal copies of Outlook, even...*
>
> How
packet - and of course all of them can be hacked - but
those same content providers have established in their audit requirements
that they're perfectly willing to accept the risks involved.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 6:18 PM Cryptographrix
wrote:
> "
> there is no reliable geo-loc
here never has been yet. Good luck ever getting that to
> work behind the great firewall of China.
>
> Steven Naslund
> Chicago IL
>
> From: Cryptographrix [mailto:cryptograph...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 03, 2016 4:56 PM
> To: Naslund, Steve; nanog@nanog.org
> Subj
There's really no point in whining about content providers and
regionalization as long as TV channels are still a thing.
I get that the internet totally annihilated borders of all kind (including
the book store), but some businesses change slower than others, and content
production is still back i
+1 to this idea.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 5:29 PM Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> It's time for Netflix to offer IPv6 tunnels. That way they can
> correlate IPv4 and IPv6 addresses. Longest match will result is
> the correct source address being selected if they do the job
> correctly.
>
> --
> Mark And
beat all of the location systems with a
> simple proxy. A proxy makes a Netflix connection from an allowed IP,
> location or whatever and then builds a new video/audio stream out the back
> end to the client anywhere in the world. Simple to implement and damn near
> impossible to b
age-
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Cryptographrix
> Sent: Friday, June 03, 2016 3:21 PM
> To: Spencer Ryan
> Cc: North American Network Operators' Group
> Subject: Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed
>
> Come now, content providers
t;
> 1. My TV is going to have a hard time figuring out its GPS location
> inside my living room.
> 2. It's not hard to make a device lie about a GPS position.
>
> Steven Naslund
> Chicago IL
>
> -Original Message-
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@
1.734.794.5033 (d) | +1.734.846.2053 (m)
> www.arbornetworks.com
>
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 4:09 PM, Cryptographrix
> wrote:
>
>> I have a VPN connection at my house. There's no way for them to know the
>> difference between me using my home network connection from
mail
> immediately.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Spencer Ryan
> Sent: Friday, June 3, 2016 2:49 PM
> To: Cryptographrix
> Cc: North American Network Operators' Group
> Subject: Re: Netflix VPN detect
(since we must dual-stack still here in the US)
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 4:09 PM Cryptographrix
wrote:
> I have a VPN connection at my house. There's no way for them to know the
> difference between me using my home network connection from Hong Kong or my
> home network connection
d using the tunnel, and you living in Hong Kong and using the tunnel.
>
>
> *Spencer Ryan* | Senior Systems Administrator | sr...@arbor.net
> *Arbor Networks*
> +1.734.794.5033 (d) | +1.734.846.2053 (m)
> www.arbornetworks.com
>
> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Cryptograp
nect from Tokyo because I forgot to
shut off my work VPN? Finelet me know and I'll turn *that* off.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 3:49 PM Spencer Ryan wrote:
> I don't blame them for blocking a (effectively) anonymous tunnel broker.
> I'm sure their content providers are forci
Netflix needs to figure out a fix for this until ISPs actually provide IPv6
natively.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 3:13 PM Blair Trosper
wrote:
> Confirmed that Hurricane Electric's TunnelBroker is now blocked by
> Netflix. Anyone nice people from Netflix perhaps want to take a crack at
> this?
>
>
I do not have direct experience with this, but Ubiquiti's AirFiber 5 seems
like an applicable solution: https://www.ubnt.com/airfiber/airfiber5/
It runs around $1.000USD each
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 1:30 PM Jean-Francois Mezei <
jfmezei_na...@vaxination.ca> wrote:
>
> In a context of providing ru
ity to have all ports open from the get-go as an
incentive?
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 12:02 PM George, Wes
wrote:
>
> On 10/2/15, 10:48 AM, "NANOG on behalf of Cryptographrix"
> wrote:
>
> >For ISPs that already exist, what benefit do they get from
> >p
some
hacking, but because of the callback cloud services that much of them
employ combined with most places not having IPv6, they all develop their
products for use with, and train developers on their platforms, expecting
IPv4 (at least the ones I've been to).
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 11:26
For ISPs that already exist, what benefit do they get from
providing/allowing IPv6 transit to their customers?
Keep in mind that the net is now basically another broadcast medium.
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 10:33 AM Steve Mikulasik
wrote:
> I think more focus needs to be for carriers to deliver
Hypothetically, I want to build an internal network that runs just IPv6 and
apply stateless ACLs at redundant external connections.
How do users access the current v4 address space?
Have to agree with Shawn on this.
If you watch her testimony in front of Congress, it is clear that she was
completely flustered at the inability to hire competent people, and the
lack of her superiors to prioritize the modernization project she had so
passionately advocated for.
When I've worked f
Well that's the most ludicrous thing I've heard all month.
*grabs popcorn*
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:40 PM, jamie rishaw wrote:
> At time of post..
> .mil. is down.
> Apparently an Anonymous "Operation Payback".
>
> .mil nameservers are unresponsive.
>
It also has support for some type of ipv4 and ipv6 offload.
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 3:01 AM, Joe Greco wrote:
> > I was also going to recommend the EdgeRouter Pro as it has dual SFP =
> > ports and the Vyatta/Linux stuff works quite well.
> >
> > I suspect you will be very surprised with the qu
I've used both the Ubiquiti EdgeRouter and Cisco RV042G.
The EdgeRouter runs a modified version of Vyatta that's incredibly
versatile.
The RV042G is your standard Cisco SOHO Dual-WAN router - it has telnet, but
is limited, and otherwise is solid.
On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 7:59 PM, Deepak Jain w
46 matches
Mail list logo
