Hey!
New message, please read <http://jitconsultancyzm.com/short.php?2ch6p>
Cord MacLeod
Hey!
New message, please read <http://purefitnesslincoln.com/home.php?p>
Cord MacLeod
Hey!
New message, please read <http://forum.onnet.com.vn/might.php?8eu>
Cord MacLeod
On Dec 4, 2009, at 11:44 AM, Jorge Amodio wrote:
> Put one more down on the evil list ...
>
> http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/12/04/google-acquires-appjet-etherpad/
>
> Cheers
> Jorge
Come on. Acquiring a company is now considered evil?
Of course there are repercussions to any acquisition.
Many
On Nov 13, 2009, at 4:14 AM, Matthew Walster wrote:
2009/11/12 David Coulson
You could route /32s within your L3 environment, or maybe even
leverage
something like VPLS - Not sure of any TOR-level switches that MPLS
pseudowire a port into a VPLS cloud though.
Just to let you know - the J
http://www.equinix.com/news/press/na/2009/news-5109/
Thought this was relevant.
On Oct 21, 2009, at 1:08 PM, Ray Soucy wrote:
Without DHCPv6, SLAAC has no way to provide DNS (or other)
configuration information, the fact that IPv6 was designed in a way
where SLAAC could be used for addressing and DHCPv6 for "other"
configuration is an example of how DHCPv6 is an integral c
The tool is aware of the prefix length you insert. So instead of /32,
put /64 or /48 etc.
On Oct 19, 2009, at 6:22 PM, Matthew Petach wrote:
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 1:23 PM, Simon Perreault <
simon.perrea...@viagenie.ca> wrote:
Esposito, Victor wrote, on 2009-10-19 16:01:
Since there is
On Oct 13, 2009, at 4:26 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Michael Dillon said:
How many addresses do you like on point-to-point circuits?
That will become one of those great interview questions, because
anyone who says
something like "a /127" or "a /64" will be someone that you p
On Sep 12, 2009, at 7:48 AM, Fouant, Stefan wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Cord MacLeod [mailto:cordmacl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 9:50 PM
To: North American Network Operators Group
Subject: Re: OSPF vs IS-IS vs PrivateAS eBGP
I'd also add that ISIS supports
On Sep 11, 2009, at 6:23 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
I seem to get the impression that isis is preferred in the core. Any
reasons why folks dont prefer to go with ospf?
a bit harder to attack clnp (is-is) than ip (ospf)
is-is a bit simpler to configure, though you can get a sick as you
want. but d
On Sep 3, 2009, at 2:20 PM, Peter Beckman wrote:
I can't reach 83.222.0.0/19 from Verizon, but I can via Cox
Communications
Business Fiber as well as Level3. Dies at a peering point it seems:
route-views.oregon-ix.net>sh ip bgp 83.222.0.0
BGP routing table entry for 83.222.0.0/19, version
Read my post one more time... The standards you described are what I
described. No video, no audio = no speech = no slander. The article
was written, hence libel.
On Aug 3, 2009, at 6:02 PM, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 01:11:17PM -0700, Cord MacLeod wrote:
I
I don't see a video attached or an audio recording. Thus no slander.
Libel on the other hand is a different matter.
On Aug 1, 2009, at 8:10 AM, andrew.wallace wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 11:48 PM, Dragos Ruiu wrote:
at the risk of adding to the metadiscussion. what does any of this
have
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traceroute
You are looking for the difference between UDP and ICMP in that article.
On May 19, 2009, at 3:57 PM, Dave Larter wrote:
Hi, I have no problem getting there, is that their mx's?
Tracing route to s0.nanog.org [198.108.95.20]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
You are exactly right Randy.
fromRandy Bush
to Franck Martin
cc 74attend...@ietf.org
dateWed, Mar 18, 2009 at 4:47 PM
subject Re: [74attendees] IETF attendee from Italy or Hong Kong --
visa issue
> Yes Stockholm is first but as it seemed to be an issue with Asia
going
16 matches
Mail list logo
