In our area of Canada, the electrical company has a "shared trench"
agreement, where ISPs (who have done the paperwork
and have elected to get involved in X project in a Y subdivision) have
access to put their own conduit in while the trenches are dug for
electrical, or they can pay the same contra
> I wonder if sat services like Starlink or Hughsnet are an option for
> remote/rural towns in this kind of scenario.
There's usually a few options for people with money or some technical knowledge
- in addition to those, local WISPs or other ISPs are usually a better option,
and sometimes cell
For residential builds' TV, in many regards there is still nothing that has all
of coax's advantages.
Very cheap to buy cable
Cable can survive a good bit of mishandling, pulling on ends, being stepped on
etc.
Cheap / simple to install and repair (outside of edge cases)
Massive base of existing
Greetings NANOG, a rare request here, I apologize that it is distanced from
the usual network routing/design/administration areas of focus... posted on
AFMUG too but NANOG seems to have many more people knowledgeable in the
upstream manufacturing of devices. If there's anywhere else where there is
Looking at the Wikipedia article, it claims that Atlantis-2 “can already be
upgraded with current technology to 160Gbit/s”. Would be interesting why that
wasn’t already done on this 20-year-old cable – assuming that the underground
infrastructure (repeaters) are compatible with the newer modula
Out here in Manitoba we use unheated/no-electricity OSP fiber patch panel
pedestals in some locations, those work without issue down to the occasional
-40. Note that that’s using all high-quality components.
For Fletcher’s case, it’s also possible that:
-there had been water intrusion in a s
Colton, can you post some examples of the Whitebox/OS examples that you were
looking at in that performance tier?
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Colton Conor
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2018 7:46 AM
To: Josh Reynolds
Cc: NANOG
Subject: Re: China
7 matches
Mail list logo
