thanks to everyone who has sent thoughts already, really quite helpful.
-Original Message-
From: wher...@gmail.com [mailto:wher...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of William Herrin
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2013 10:45 AM
To: Christopher Palmer
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group
Subject:
I am trolling for information/community wisdom.
What is the probability that a random path between two Internet hosts will
traverse a middlebox that drops or otherwise barfs on fragmented IPv4 packets?
If anyone has any data or anecdotes, please feel free to send an off-list email
or whatever.
This is being esclated.
-Original Message-
From: Hibler, Florian [mailto:florian.hib...@kaiaglobal.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 4:38 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Office 365 broken on ipv6
Hi,
seems at least one box got fixed:
dyn-10-0-2-50:~ local_fhibler$ telnet -6 outlook
Thank you for the thanks :)
We'll be leaving the www.xbox.com web properties online indefinitely. We're
holding on other properties but are moving forward at a brisk pace.
Best,
Chris
-Original Message-
From: Murphy, Jay, DOH [mailto:jay.mur...@state.nm.us]
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011
The title of this ongoing thread is giving me heart palpitations.
Content access over IPv6 may help "justify" ISPs investing in IPv6, but it in
no means is a prerequisite technically.
LSNs are "fine" when deployed in parallel with IPv6 IMHO. There has to be a
pathway to "good" networking.
To
We're very concerned about permanently configuring hosts into a non-standard
state. That is one reason our World IPv6 Day fix is only a temporary
modification of the Windows sorting order and isn't being pushed through
Windows Update.
Permanently disabling IPv6 as a solution to the "IPv6 broken
6 matches
Mail list logo
