Hi Guys,
Sorry for the off-topic post.
I would appreciate it if someone that has rack space in MDXi can please
ping me off list. I just have a few (two or three) random questions that I
would appreciate some general feedback on.
Many thanks,
--
Regards,
Chris Knipe
t
>
> I welcome input on this as I look into the history a little more.
>
> Cheers!
>
> James
>
> On 1/29/20 7:27 AM, Chris Knipe wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > http://ftp.afrinic.net/stats/afrinic/delegated-afrinic-extended-20200129
> >
> > Another
se from as much as ten years ago. It is not at this
> moment clear to me that Afrinic is even in possession of such historical
> backups, and the fact that they have, as yet, made no apparent efforts to
> remediate the fradulently fiddled person: records suggests to me that they
> likely do not possess such backups.
>
> Many of the legacy blocks and many parts of the blocks that were stolen
> from the Afrinic free pool, both those that have been reclaimed and those
> that haven't yet been reclaimed, continue to be routed by various parties
> on behalf of the thieves and black market buyers of these blocks even as
> we speak. I hope to be able to post a fully list of those routes and the
> relevant ASNs that are providing the ongoing routing for various parts of
> this mass of stolen booty in the very near future.
>
>
> Regards,
> rfg
>
--
Regards,
Chris Knipe
ind myself in the absolute last situation
where I wanted to be in.
Regards,
Chris.
On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 4:44 PM Joe Provo wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 10:55:47AM +0200, Chris Knipe wrote:
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > Except for the email on ARIN's details, does anyone e
On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 3:13 PM Jason Biel wrote:
> 22/8 is actively used by DoD, just not publicly. It would be in your best
> interest to not accept routes for it.
>
> if you need something more official, contact the DoD NIC directly at the
> email address specified in WHOIS.
>
>
Precisely what
en re-assigned, or that is in use by
anyone else.
--
Regards,
Chris Knipe
s the 22.0.0.0/8 network, which according to ARIN is
actively assigned to the DoD (US).
--
Regards,
Chris Knipe
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 9:53 PM Christopher Morrow
wrote:
> Maybe asking from the get-go:
> "What are you trying to do?"
>
> because the question asked is fraught with peril and disaster...
>
Why? When you have a serious problem with a specific ASN, it's not
unreasonable to drop traffic to th
t; --
> -Barry Shein
>
> Software Tool & Die| b...@theworld.com |
> http://www.TheWorld.com
> Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: +1 617-STD-WRLD | 800-THE-WRLD
> The World: Since 1989 | A Public Information Utility | *oo*
>
--
Regards,
Chris Knipe
...@amazon.com
>
> --
> S.C.
>
Then update your ARIN records to reflect that. Fully agree with Dan on
this one.
--
Regards,
Chris Knipe
On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 4:57 PM Akshay Kumar via NANOG
wrote:
> The 2nd requirement seems artificial. The new hypervisors have come a long
> way and the overhead is minimal. Also you can run bare metal instances in
> AWS if you really need them with 100Gbps.
>
> Just just use the South Africa AWS
there something out
there to manage this with?
--
Regards,
Chris Knipe
Pv6 in the TCP/IP stack.
> > Disabling it immediately solves the issue.
> >
> > Quite odd that this is happening in 2018...
> >
> > Mark.
>
> I’ve had IPv6 enabled for a while and I don’t have the same issue. We
> also
> peer directly with Microsoft. Are you sure it’s an IPv6 issue and not a
> general reachability issue?
>
> -Daniel
>
>
>
--
Regards,
Chris Knipe
heir service.
>
>
Also, no reason why a UDP (or DNS based even) query can't be implemented to
facilitate reputation lookups for ASNs, or even ownership.
--
Regards,
Chris Knipe
On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 6:17 PM, wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Mar 2017 17:59:59 +0200, Chris Knipe said:
>
>
> Sure, that will work. (And no, the problem isn't the number of http hits
> on the registries. 35,840,000,000 hits per day is the easy part...)
>
And yet, there'
On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 5:59 PM, Baldur Norddahl
wrote:
> They could watch the routing table and notice which ASN is actually using
> the address space. In fact ASN reputation might work better than IP space
> reputation.
>
+1
And not only the originating ASN, but to a lesser extend, adjacent
On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 5:40 PM, wrote:
>
> How does Spamhaus find out the block has been resold?
>
> How do other DNS-based blacklist operators find out?
>
>
>From the REGISTRY as the ultimate custodian of the IP block.
> How do all the AS's that have their own internal blacklists find out th
gt;> 116.73.65.248
> >> 116.100.170.92
> >> 117.0.7.77
> >> 117.1.26.234
> >> 117.195.254.3
> >> 118.32.44.99
> >> 118.42.15.21
> >> 118.43.112.120
> >> 118.100.64.159
> >> 118.163.191.208
> >> 119.199.160.207
> >> 119.202.78.47
> >> 120.71.215.81
> >> 121.129.203.22
> >> 121.178.104.129
> >> 121.180.53.143
> >> 122.117.245.28
> >> 123.9.72.86
> >> 123.16.78.77
> >> 123.23.49.149
> >> 123.24.108.10
> >> 123.24.250.187
> >> 123.25.74.209
> >> 123.27.159.13
> >> 123.240.245.72
> >> 124.66.99.251
> >> 124.131.28.38
> >> 125.166.193.206
> >> 125.227.138.132
> >> 138.204.203.66
> >> 171.97.245.221
> >> 171.224.7.147
> >> 171.226.20.220
> >> 171.232.118.93
> >> 171.248.210.120
> >> 171.249.223.213
> >> 171.250.26.209
> >> 173.56.21.67
> >> 175.138.81.130
> >> 175.203.202.232
> >> 175.207.137.139
> >> 175.211.251.156
> >> 177.207.49.108
> >> 177.207.67.170
> >> 177.223.52.193
> >> 178.222.246.96
> >> 179.4.140.63
> >> 179.235.55.39
> >> 179.253.163.107
> >> 180.73.117.62
> >> 180.254.224.10
> >> 182.37.156.98
> >> 182.180.80.75
> >> 182.180.123.43
> >> 183.46.49.216
> >> 183.144.245.235
> >> 186.19.48.158
> >> 186.69.170.130
> >> 186.219.1.156
> >> 187.104.248.17
> >> 187.211.63.51
> >> 188.209.153.15
> >> 189.101.220.244
> >> 189.234.9.147
> >> 191.103.35.250
> >> 191.180.198.31
> >> 191.249.21.41
> >> 196.207.83.23
> >> 197.224.37.108
> >> 201.243.225.103
> >> 210.178.250.121
> >> 211.7.146.51
> >> 211.216.202.191
> >> 213.5.216.213
> >> 213.14.195.100
> >> 213.170.76.149
> >> 217.129.243.48
> >> 218.161.121.178
> >> 218.186.43.224
> >> 220.85.169.133
> >> 220.132.111.124
> >> 220.133.24.142
> >> 220.133.198.71
> >> 220.133.234.229
> >> 220.134.132.200
> >> 220.134.193.133
> >> 220.135.64.43
> >> 221.145.147.78
> >> 221.159.105.17
> >> 221.167.64.53
> >> 222.254.238.188
> >> 223.154.223.159
> >
>
>
--
Regards,
Chris Knipe
Hi,
Anyone from NetRouting NOC (AS47869) that can contact me off list please.
Not getting anywhere resolving a routing issue with your support personnel.
--
Regards,
Chris Knipe
gt;
Although a company that can't manage their book keeping properly, is IMHO
enough reason to not use them... :-)
--
Regards,
Chris Knipe
Exactly.
So what precisely are the metrics they use to block? I'm not using a proxy
at all, its my own ASN...
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 11:06 PM, Andy Ringsmuth wrote:
>
> > On Jun 8, 2016, at 3:52 PM, Chris Knipe wrote:
> >
> > Bwahaha
> >
> > Ok - that&#
t; > > ipv4 only endpont.
> > > >
> > > > If Netflix needs help with this point me in the right direction.
> > > > I'll
> > > be
> > > > happy to fix it for them and send them a bill.
> > > >
> > >
> > > They're doing the same thing with IPv4 (banning people based on the
> > > apparent IP address). Your IPv4 numbers may not be on their blacklist
> > > at the moment, and disabling IPv6 might work for you, but the
> > > underlying problem is the practice of GeoIP/VPN blocking, and the
> > > HE.net tunnels are just one example of the collateral damage.
> > >
> > > I don't know why Netflix and other GeoIP users can't just ask
> > > customers where they are located, instead of telling them. It is
> > > possible that some user might lie, but what about "assume good faith"?
> > > It shows how much they value you as a customer if they would rather
> > > dump you than trust you to tell them where you are located.
> > >
> > > -Laszlo
> > >
>
>
>
--
Regards,
Chris Knipe
On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 12:04 AM, Josh Reynolds
wrote:
> Can't do more than 1Gbps per flow. Not suitable for this application.
> On Apr 15, 2016 5:03 PM, wrote:
>
> > Check out the Mikrotik Cloud Core routers, they make them with SFP+
> > support now. I have one of them with 10g deployed right n
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Mike Hammett wrote:
> There's little reason to buy a newer TV more than every 5 - 10 years, so
> many TVs will be stranded until (if) they have some unifying firmware.
>
>
Well the TV is also meaningless if the CPE, and (at the very least) service
provider don't s
Highly unlikely...
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Bacon Zombie wrote:
> Do all "smart" TVs and Game consoles fully support IPv6 out of the box?
> On 28 Jan 2016 10:17, "Chris Knipe" wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>>
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>
> Fortunately Netflix is running IPv6 for most things already. If you’re an
> ISP and you’re not
> allowing them to reach Netflix via IPv6, then you’re part of the problem
> rather than the solution.
>
>
Sure. Easy to say when you have acces
was the end of it, and I think
two, or three on the Freeradius lists, and that was the end of that...
Hundreds, and hundreds on NANOG however.
--
Regards,
Chris Knipe
almost no questions
asked (never mind a good number of what, hundred thousands, over a period
of days) -sigh-
It's amazing how 'fair' the playing field on the Internet has become.
--
Regards,
Chris Knipe
t;
>
>
>
> Salima Ait Meziane
>
>
--
Regards,
Chris Knipe
they still need
> the IPv4 space in the near-term.
>
Sitting in exactly the same position. IPv6 is great and all, but running
my business natively on IPv6 means nothing to me if my customers can't
reach me.
--
Regards,
Chris Knipe
love it, send Job your accolades. If you hate it,
> > see above disclaimer. If in a country with a holiday on monday,
> > enjoy it safely.
> >
> > - Jared
> >
>
>
--
Regards,
Chris Knipe
xperience with
> APs
> > > that
> > > > you can use in locations that have 300-500 users. I friend
> recommended
> > me
> > > > Ruckus Wireless, it would be great if you can share your experience
> > with
> > > > Ruckus or with a similar
u are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
> at
> Hinduja Global Solutions or postmas...@teamhgs.com immediately and destroy
> all copies of
> this message and any attachments.
>
> 9284f6a0-bf16-11e3-b1b6-0800200c9a66
--
Regards,
Chris Knipe
ate requirements (such as going provider
independant) cannot obtain address space. And it is continueing to
this very day. I'm definately all for proper audits, stricter audits,
and more importantly the releasing of unused address space back to the
respective registries.
--
Regards,
Chris Knipe
t sent. (#793)
>>
>>
>> But, as usual, everything is "totally fine" according to the GApps status
>> page:
>> http://www.google.com/appsstatus#hl=en&v=status&ts=1372272841152
>>
>> --
>> Blair Trosper
>> Weather Data / Updraft Networks
>> blair.tros...@updraftnetworks.com
>> NOC: 512-666-0536
>>
--
Regards,
Chris Knipe
35 matches
Mail list logo
