This short term mindset is part of the problem. I’ve seen projects around me
using CAF funds that push DSLAMs further into the network to get users up to
100mbps, but they are already at their ceiling as soon as they are installed. I
admire providers who invest beyond the short term into somethi
I’d be interested to understand the rationale for not wanting to change the
definition. Is it strictly the business/capital outlay expense?
Thanks,
Chris Adams
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Jason
Canady
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2021 8:39 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: New minimum speed for US b
If you feel that Google's IPV6 statistics are accurate, this provides a view:
https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html#tab=per-country-ipv6-adoption&tab=per-country-ipv6-adoption
Japan: 9.49%
South Korea: 1.96%
Both of which are significantly better than North Korea's adoption rate of
Most reputable enterprise wireless solutions employ band-steering which helps
to "force" users onto 5ghz, but still allows clients to connect to 2.4 if it's
the only SSID strong enough or if the client only supports 2.4ghz. Band
steering largely negates the need to run two SSIDs for optimal band
4 matches
Mail list logo
