On 2019-09-06, Stephen Stuart sent:
> Do you see the same behavior when you execute your dig query without
> the trailing dot?
Yes. dig adds on the trailing dot to make it an FQDN anyway, so the on-wire
qname is the same either way.
--
Chip Marshall
IN 2001:4860:4802:32::75
www-anycast.google.com. 300 IN 2001:4860:4802:34::75
www-anycast.google.com. 300 IN 2001:4860:4802:38::75
www-anycast.google.com. 300 IN 2001:4860:4802:36::75
;; Received 167 bytes from 216.239.38.10#53(n
the right thing by
ignoring the answer, as there's no linkage between www and www-anycast.
Is this broken, or is this just some weird DNS trick I've not come across
before?
--
Chip Marshall
. Is there
> any standard convention for community numbering (*:666 for RTBH for
> example)? I’ve looked at some examples from other carriers and it looks
> like everyone does their own thing.
>
> -Matt
>
> --
> Matthew Crocker
> Crocker Communications, Inc.
> President
>
--
Chip Marshall
http://2bithacker.net/
is "when are we going to get some memorable
IPv6 public recursive DNS servers?"
2001:4860:4860:: or 2620:fe::fe just aren't quite as catchy as
8.8.8.8 or 9.9.9.9.
--
Chip Marshall
http://2bithacker.net/
;
> Also, policer all UDP all the time... UDP is unsafe at any speed.
Hi, DigitalOcean here. We've taken steps to mitigate this attack on our network.
Also, we've only seen udp/11211 being a problem. I'd be interested to
hear of anyone seeing tcp/11211 attacks.
--
Chip Marshall
http://2bithacker.net/
local bespoke measurements
> >
> > PS you can get a free Eval of statseeker. Obnote, don't work for them just
> > a fairly happy customer
> >
> > alan
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> Anurag Bhatia
> anuragbhatia.com
--
Chip Marshall
http://2bithacker.net/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
n some small things that I feel is missing in my
> >> switches/routers. Plug in this imaginary "SFP computer" to enhance the
> >> switch with a small Linux. The SFP slot provides both networking and power
> >> to the device.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Baldur
> >
--
Chip Marshall
http://2bithacker.net/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
esn't use Java for the
client though. With things like NoVNC and Guacamole out there
now, it seems like a HTML5 based remote KVM should be possible
and not a nightmare to work with.
--
Chip Marshall
http://2bithacker.net/
pgp86f06gDycO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
56.
For example, Renesys reports "x 3549 33517" where it should only
be able to see "x 3356 33517" or maybe "x 3549 3356 33517".
(Due to Renesys policy, I can't know what x is)
--
Chip Marshall
http://2bithacker.net/
pgpUcrBhQwmHj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
y granular
enough for a lot of cases.
--
Chip Marshall
http://2bithacker.net/
pgpDfvwQUlHki.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ipate in things like the PBL. Why not establish something
similar for allocation sizes in IPv6?
--
Chip Marshall
http://2bithacker.net/
pgplU52TRFvXb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 2013-06-12, Phil Fagan sent:
> Speaking of Splunk; is that really the tool of choice?
I've been hearing a lot of good things about logstash these days
too, if you prefer the open source route.
http://logstash.net/
--
Chip Marshall
http://2bithacker.net/
pgpSopEO5YDs6.pgp
Des
On 2013-04-08, Andrew Latham sent:
> Maybe http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cacti_(software) would do what you want.
>
> www: http://www.cacti.net/index.php
If we're talking SNMP counters, Observium might be worth a look.
http://www.observium.org/
--
Chip Marshall
http://
ke to have:
* Interface configs
* Firewall filter configs
* BGP session configs
* User management
* Support for multiple router and switch vendors (at least
Juniper and Cisco)
--
Chip Marshall
http://2bithacker.net/
pgp4mvtHzIASB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
6, n)
'2001:abcd::c010:a0a'
Or is the issue just the ntop part not giving you back the
decimalized string?
--
Chip Marshall
http://weblog.2bithacker.net/ KB1QYWPGP key ID 43C4819E
v4sw5PUhw4/5ln5pr5FOPck4ma4u6FLOw5Xm5l5Ui2e4t4/5ARWb7HKOen6a2Xs5IMr2g6CM
pgpXgIGWgwfyD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 16-Dec-2010, Paul Stewart sent:
> Pardon my ignorance here but what does Comcast do for the NANOG
> community? I know they attend many conferences and share their
> experiences with a lot of us which is very much appreciated...
>
> Just asking ;)
http://nanog.org/meetings/nan
* 18818536 = 521,461.63 crimes
So it's not really that there is less crime, there's just less chance of
a particular person being the perpetrator or victim.
Also, my population numbers are based on 2006 data provided by
Wikipedia, and therefore are not to be trusted.
--
Chip Marshall
18 matches
Mail list logo
