On Tue, 4 Jan 2011, Takashi Tome wrote:
That was true some 30 years ago...
That's still true today. There's an insane amount of in-house stuff still
kicking around, for various reasons, some reasonable, some not so much.
Actually, I think the problem is quite different. Big telco's network is
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010, Leo Bicknell wrote:
Every meeting I have with a colo provider I suggest this exact idea.
Patch cables (cat5, single mode, multi-mode), fiber couplers, maybe
even SFP's, velcro ties, a 10-in-1 screwdriver, etc.
I'd say skip the colo provider, and look for vending machine comp
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010, Christopher Morrow wrote:
this paper, while full of math and graphs and sh*t, doesn't make my
acl management simpler, clearer or more complete... I keep trying to
push my acls through the paper, no joy yet.
there's code or something somewhere that implements the algorithms a
On Thu, 19 Aug 2010, George Michaelson wrote:
I have been looking at acl management s/w in the freecode space and I can find
lots of tools which manage/distribute and test ACLs in routers.
I'm wondering if anyone has written a parser which can construct rule-trees and
get rid of the cruft, unu
Looks like some of akamai's nameservers have misplaced themselves and yahoo.
cheers!
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008, Nathan Ward wrote:
There is no A records, correct.
There is a CNAME though:
www.wa1.b.yahoo.com.45 IN CNAME www-real.wa1.b.yahoo.com.
www-real.wa1.b.yahoo.com. 45IN
On Sun, 10 Aug 2008, Chris Paul wrote:
And we'll change to IPv6 tomorrow!
Total apples and oranges. We all have to patch anyhow. This is just code and
firewall rules. IPv6 is way more complicated, friend.
No - IPv6 is just code (and not even firewall rules).
cheers!
==
On Mon, 13 Aug 2007, Leo Bicknell wrote:
It seems to me an off the shelf PC with a Core 2 Duo processor, 4
gig of memory, and a gigabit ethernet port would be 1-2 orders of
magnitude faster than what's currently in the routers. Optimize
for a multithreaded CPU, add a second and it would converg
On Sun, 8 Jul 2007, Lixia Zhang wrote:
I agree here. So the mostly needed thing is some verification system.
I keep on coming back to "any proposal that requires universal adoption
and deployment is fatally flawed".
As far as "needing a verification system", is there something deeply
problema
8 matches
Mail list logo
