, Warren Bailey <
wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com> wrote:
> I guess the Speedtest servers near metro areas do probably get pretty beat
> up. Has anyone paid the Ookla ransom for their own public server? I'd be
> really curious to see what they peak at.
>
>
> Sent
r
> for
> over a year and it escalated quite high up their escalation chain before they
> finally admitted "Yeah, Services JunOS is different and it behaves differently
> and if you need to do what you're trying to do, you should buy an M or MX
> series."
>
> It's quite unfortunate. I'd really like for the SRX series to not be so
> crippled for
> my purposes.
>
> Owen
>
>
--
Carl Rosevear
Manager of Operations
Skytap, Inc.
direct (206) 588-8899
ytime the fcc tries to reclaim frequencies all these guys come
>> out of the wood work with the magic phrase 'emergency communications' and
>> some congressmen get on their side about it.
>>
>> It will be amusing to see, yes.
>
>
>
> from our cold dead hands.
>
>
> kd8mzn
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Carl Rosevear
Manager of Operations
Skytap, Inc.
direct (206) 588-8899
;
> -Jack Carrozzo
>
> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Christopher Pilkington wrote:
>
>> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Jack Carrozzo wrote:
>> > Nope, mostly HF (under 30mhz) gear at 300baud. Yes, you read that right.
>>
>> You are running IP on this? An
"Eating Up" sounds so overweight and unhealthy. Since a good number
of us get paid for delivering bits, isn't this a good thing? Always
glad to see bits and dollars flowing into the Internet, personally.
However must express severe dissatisfaction with the topic of the
thread a while ago referenc
>
> http://www.quova.com/what/request-ip-update/
>
> The problem is that the F5 devices don't update the database files
> automatically, they need to be manually updated. Unless I get a specific
> request at my company I don't bother updating on a regular basis.
>
>
before
> (we always land at www.google.com), so I'm not sure where to take our
> trouble. The page at:
>
> http://www.google.com/support/websearch/bin/request.py?contact_type=ip
>
> isn't of much help as it assumes the problem is google.com redirection.
>
> Are there
> That's strange, I abhor the Cisco way of doing VLANs and love the
> HP/Procurve method.
>
> What do you find so irritating?
>
I find it irritating because I am often running thousands of vlans and
do not want to explicitly type them all out in the config or to have
to do so with a script. `swit
The main problem with HP switches and their 'free software upgrades' is that
there are regularly bugs and regressions in the software and their solution is
to have you 'oh just update the software'... this is not always practical in a
production environment. And other weirdnesses. I like thei
I'm not normally one to respond to NANOG messages with opinions but...
Yeah, NAT broke the internet. Yes you can engineer around it. There is NO
reason to hold onto NAT as a standard. With v6 we have the opportunity to do it
right (or at least semi-right) from the beginning, lets not choos
but I think
my needs have been met. Owen, this one from you tied it all together. Thanks
all!
--Carl
-Original Message-
From: Owen DeLong [mailto:o...@delong.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 10:41 AM
To: Carl Rosevear
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: IPv6 Confusion
On Feb 17
ight in IPv4? Right, so think of your basic bit boundaries that you adhere to
as /?? And /??? In IPv6." Or "Throw all that old thought out the window.
Now its kind of like how the Ford Probe is actually a Mazda... ummm Yeah
I can't really explain it either but it makes sense. Here read this book and
it'll make sense to you too."
Respectfully yours,
Carl Rosevear
12 matches
Mail list logo
