Re: 10G tester recommendations?

2016-10-04 Thread Brian Mengel
We've used the Veex TX300 (now discontinued and replaced with the TX230S I believe) and been satisfied. Our primary use is RFC 2544 testing, so I don't know much about it's capabilities beyond that. On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Dustin Jurman wrote: > We utilize the EXFO product line and it's

Re: CALEA

2016-05-12 Thread Brian Mengel
wrote: > On Tue, 10 May 2016 17:00:54 -0400, Brian Mengel > wrote: > > AFAIK being able to do a lawful intercept on a specific, named, >> individual's service has been a requirement for providers since 2007. >> > > It's been required for longer than tha

Re: CALEA

2016-05-11 Thread Brian Mengel
AFAIK being able to do a lawful intercept on a specific, named, individual's service has been a requirement for providers since 2007. I have never heard of a provider, big or small, being called out for being unable to provide this service when requested. I would be surprised if a national broadb

Re: Fwd: Re: DOCSIS 3.0 & PPPoE/L2TP compatibility

2012-08-01 Thread Brian Mengel
One thing to be mindful of is that BSoD support may not be prevelant in the installed modem base of your MSO. Replacing those modems would be costly for someone. On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 10:17 AM, iptech wrote: > Hi Scott, > > Thanks for the feedback, > > yes this is how I understand it also, howe

IPv6 end user addressing

2011-08-05 Thread Brian Mengel
In reviewing IPv6 end user allocation policies, I can find little agreement on what prefix length is appropriate for residential end users. /64 and /56 seem to be the favorite candidates, with /56 being slightly preferred. I am most curious as to why a /60 prefix is not considered when trying to