> On 29 Sep 2015, at 20:48 , Ca By wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 1:37 PM, David Hubbard <
> dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com> wrote:
>
>> Had an idea the other day; we just need someone with a lot of cash
>> (google, apple, etc) to buy Netflix and then make all new releases
>> v6-only for the
> On 03 Sep 2015, at 13:35 , Robert Webb wrote:
>
> We are seeing udp 500 packets being dropped at our firewall from user's
> browsing sessions. These are users on a 2008 R2 AD setup with Windows 7.
>
> Source and destination ports are udp 500 and the the pattern of drops
> directly correlate
> On 26 Aug 2015, at 15:23 , Ca By wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 8:16 AM, wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 07:28:08 -0700, Ca By said:
>>
>>> Another relevant metric, less than 25% of my mobile subscribers traffic
>>> require NAT64 translating. 75+% of bits flows through end-to-end IPv6
> On 22 Jun 2015, at 12:27 , Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 01:15:41PM +0100,
> Tony Finch wrote
> a message of 15 lines which said:
>
>> The problems are that UTC is unpredictable,
>
> That's because the earth rotation is unpredictable. Any time based on
> this buggy
> On 14 Apr 2015, at 01:59 , Jared Mauch wrote:
>
> For those wondering, nearly 62% of VZ Wireless traffic is IPv6.
to a few select websites (not in term of overall traffic).
> http://www.worldipv6launch.org/measurements/
On 10 Jun 2014, at 10:10 , Saku Ytti wrote:
> On (2014-06-10 09:41 +), Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>
>> IPv4 addresses have little commercial value anymore and IPv6 is basically
>> free. The only people who still haven’t realised don’t have enough money to
>> spend on
addresses have little commercial value anymore and IPv6 is basically free.
The only people who still haven’t realised don’t have enough money to spend on
IPv4 to keep themselves alive for another decade.
—
Bjoern A. Zeeb "Come on. Learn, goddamn it.", WarGames, 1983
Pv6-enabled DNS, mailman.nanog.org has
an IPv6 address. What else do you need to reply to this list?
—
Bjoern A. Zeeb ? ??? ??? ??:
'??? ??? ?? ??? ?? ?? ??? ??? ??? ? ?
?? ?? ? ', ? ?, "??? ? ?? ?", ?.???
ed 'restrict -6 default ignore' lines or similar as well, not just a
restrict default ignore.
—
Bjoern A. Zeeb ? ??? ??? ??:
'??? ??? ?? ??? ?? ?? ??? ??? ??? ? ?
?? ?? ? ', ? ?, "??? ? ?? ?", ?.???
ght still be a
> challenge (I haven't tested),
Read the publications from http://routebricks.org/ (and check the year)
I thought there was a presentation about this (or similar) a few years ago
but maybe I just remember the “software router” thread from 5 years ago.
/bz
—
Bjoern A. Zeeb ? ??? ??? ??:
'??? ??? ?? ??? ?? ?? ??? ??? ??? ? ?
?? ?? ? ', ? ?, "??? ? ?? ?", ?.???
pe 2001:db8::1, source address fe80::ff:fe00:80b
I actually tried to see if I could cross the atlantic with such a packet,
only to find that I didn't have an exist gateway showing this bug. Oh well,
I am safe.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
I
ed in BBCP (bad best current practices)?
Well I know you have it online, but polling a website is harder than getting
it delivered to the inbox every week;)
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Stop bit received. Insert coin for new address family.
domain to 5 minutes in an effort to minimize propagation delays.
>
> For your reference, the new IP's are:
>
> 204.93.212.138
> 2001:1838::cc5d:d48a
Fix reverse mapping, especially for IPv6, before activating or you'll get
bounces.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb
raft state:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-itojun-v6ops-v4mapped-harmful
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Stop bit received. Insert coin for new address family.
e to write an article about that after W6D...
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Stop bit received. Insert coin for new address family.
o what they have done for a decade or two. It's hard to
see the change and results in "why is this all so different and complicated?".
It's hard to open ones mind for the new, but it is essential to do with new
technology.
So I advice people not to get trapped by their l
On Jun 6, 2011, at 4:14 PM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
Hi,
I wrote that reply the hour your email came in, but didn't want
to send this out earlier to not distract people too much.
> FreeBSD is initiating IPv6-only validation work
I think that's a less scary topic to some readers so I put it into
sub
stand the options some people have or how much content
might be available on IPv6 already and might have been for years.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have visions!
Stop bit received. Insert coin for new address family.
On May 14, 2011, at 7:57 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
> On May 13, 2011, at 9:09 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>
>> On May 14, 2011, at 2:12 AM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>>>
>>>> In other words,
t;
> There will be no IPv6-only users. There will only be users with better IPv6
> connectivity than IPv4 connectivity.
My Desktop is not able to make any IPv4 socket connections anymore. I get
"Protocol not supported". So there are IPv6-only users, already bitten by
no AAAA.
ged a lot between OpenBSD 4.6 and 4.7. We will need to
updated our patch quite significantly.
Let me add that the plan still is to have it in the update pf in
FreeBSD for 9.0, though this will be for a 4.5 equivalent pf.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb You have to have vi
r.
I would really love to see weekly Routing Reports for IPv6 as we have
them for legacy IP rather sooner than later.
/bz
--
Bjoern A. Zeeb Welcome a new stage of life.
Going to jail sucks -- All my daemons like it!
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8
22 matches
Mail list logo
