You know you're off track when..
What operational relevance does this conversation, or the similiar
ones that came before it, have? Are there a bunch in production
contributing to the degradation of the best route between me and this
video of cute kittens I'm trying to watch? Did something
On Sun, 17 Aug 2008, Jared Mauch wrote:
I agree, how many of you folks that use IRRs have
ever deleted an IRR object? Heck, some ISPs even
add them based on existence of advertised routes.
On that topic, how do you delete IRR objects when the person who created
them used a unique maintainer o
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, Rev. Jeffrey Paul wrote:
As much as I hate to contribute to the problem, I'd like to point out
that the barrage of useless, off-topic, empty traffic on this list in
the last week is, in my estimation, quite a bit above the "usual" ruckus
of NANOG.
While I'm not one to thunk
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Bill Nash wrote:
Except for domain registrars, who are only really a registrar when they make
a mistake that could cost your entire commercial enterprise.
Edit: s/when/until/
Beer:30.
- billn
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, David Conrad wrote:
On Jun 27, 2008, at 10:57 AM, Bill Nash wrote:
I'd rather see ICANN spend time on current problems instead of making new
ones.
Out of curiosity, what are the problems you feel ICANN should be spending its
time on?
For starters, has Verisign
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Scott Francis wrote:
perhaps somebody with more insight can explain the rationale to me
(DRC?) - is there a purpose served here aside from corporate/legal
interests?
It strikes me as fomenting another gold rush. The notion that disputed
TLDs go up for auction sounds like
Express invitations for blackholing from the spammers. =)
- billn
On Thu, 24 Apr 2008, Logan, Robert wrote:
> Is this what the mail list has come to?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: nanog@nanog.org [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2008 3:06 PM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
>
I wouldn't be shocked at all if this was an element of multi-pronged
lobbying approaches, reminiscent of the 'fiber to the home' tax break
series that hit a handful of years back that got us pretty much nothing.
Given trivial tech milestones like these:
http://www.thelocal.se/7869/20070712/ (20
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007, Bill Nash wrote:
> I built a perl daemon using Net::BGP and DBI that inserted and removed
> routes, on update, into an SQL db. I could then query to my hearts
> content, beating up a db with full routes with all the efficiency of SQL.
> It's simple as hel
On Tue, 26 Jun 2007, Jo Rhett wrote:
> >I think someone suggests the above everytime a discussion comes up. In the
> >spirit of "a very simple solution", everyone can be their own dictator of
> >their own mailbox -- they don't need to protect the rest of the list, or
> >develop a consensus for ch
Sweet zombie jesus, this is the stupid thread that's ever, for lack of a
better term, graced this list, and I think I was even party to the
predecessor.
I am eternally in your debt for bringing us this new low.
- billn
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Martin Hannigan wrote:
>
> On 6/12/07, [EMAIL PROT
11 matches
Mail list logo
