Hi,
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 10:11:47PM +0300, Max Tulyev wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I know there are many people from many countries.
>
> Do you know something about mandatory measurements of Internet access
> quality from country telecom regulators? If yes, could you please share
> that information w
-only DHT nodes, I don't see how this would be possible in general.
The code of the DHT client is here:
https://github.com/savoirfairelinux/opendht
> On Wednesday, April 27, 2016, Baptiste Jonglez
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 01:16:28PM -0700, Aaron Hopkins wro
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 01:16:28PM -0700, Aaron Hopkins wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Apr 2016, Baptiste Jonglez wrote:
>
> >While doing statistics on the participants of a public DHT, I was
> >surprised to see some IP addresses that are not present in the DFZ:
>
> I believe thos
Hi,
While doing statistics on the participants of a public DHT, I was
surprised to see some IP addresses that are not present in the DFZ:
2607:7700:0:25::4e00:605b
2607:7700:0:25::4e25:8ce8
2607:7700:0:25::c808:db2c
2607:7700:0:4::3294:6683
2607:7700:0:4::4c09:4d39
2607:7700:0:4::5985:87d1
2607:7
Hi,
In its peering documentation
[https://peering.google.com/about/traffic_management.html],
Google claims that it can drive peering links at 100% utilisation:
> Congestion management
>
> Peering ports with Google can be run at 100% capacity in the short term,
> with low (<1-2%) packet loss. Pl
5 matches
Mail list logo