n you're hosed after the first "commit".
--
Andrew Fried
andrew.fr...@gmail.com
The brutal reality in todays world is that anyone that relies on the
Internet is just asking for stuff like this. No service is safe.
Andrew
Andrew Fried
andrew.fr...@gmail.com
On 10/21/16 5:58 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> anyone who relies on a single dns provider is just asking for stuff s
The Lantronix Spiders work well and aren't a "do-it-yourself" option:
http://www.lantronix.com/products/lantronix-spider/
Andrew
Andrew Fried
andrew.fr...@gmail.com
On 3/8/16 10:30 AM, greg whynott wrote:
> Recently I have taking over the responsibility of managing about 1
While still in pre-production state, you might want to look at:
http://dnsdist.org/
Andrew
Andrew Fried
andrew.fr...@gmail.com
On 8/27/15 3:13 PM, Brooks Bridges wrote:
> Spent quite a bit of time researching products out there looking for one
> that will do content switching based
protect their income
from leasing IPv4 addresses doesn't matter to the vast majority of the
end users; they simply can't access IPv6 via IPv4 only networks,
without using some kludgy, complicated tunneling protocols.
Andy
--
Andrew Fried
andrew.fr...@gmail.com
On 6/17/14, 5:48 PM, Ja
++1
Andrew Fried
andrew.fr...@gmail.com
On 5/10/14, 2:42 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> Nice discussion about history & motivations. Not completely correct, but it's
> always fun to argue over history, and over motivations, since both are open
> to intepretation.
>
Any chance you could provide a *clue* as to what you're seeing, eg
message subject, from, etc???
Andrew Fried
andrew.fr...@gmail.com
On 4/13/14, 1:00 AM, Babak Farrokhi wrote:
> We are not using spamasassin and only major RBLs in place and seeing the same
> wave of spam. Seems like a
My connectivity between Fios and Cogent in Washington DC has been mostly
down for the past hour.
Andrew
Andrew Fried
andrew.fr...@gmail.com
On 4/2/14, 3:03 PM, Eric wrote:
> Anyone know if there is a connectivity issue between Cogent and ATT in the
> northeast? We're seeing rand
You fared better than I did. I also am a Verizon Business customer,
and when I called and inquired about ipv6 I was told that they didn't
carry that channel. :)
Andrew Fried
andrew.fr...@gmail.com
On 1/7/14, 11:28 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Christopher Morrow (morrowc.li...@gmail.co
.
Andy
Andrew Fried
andrew.fr...@gmail.com
On 11/14/13, 5:11 PM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> List of CDNs would be difficult, but not impossible. Although they do
> different things, so a simple list is unlikely to be as useful as it looks.
>
> A lost of CDN "DC nodes" is no
>From AS54054 in Ashburn, VA I can ping your address but traceroute's
aren't making it through.
Andrew
Andrew Fried
andrew.fr...@gmail.com
On 11/3/13, 1:30 PM, Clinton Work wrote:
> IPV6 connectivity to fireball.acr.fi is failing inside Cogent AS174. I
> have already conta
Not so easy and straightforward to do. You'll find that a lot of the
big names out there frequently tweak DNS, which will result in a
non-stop stream of "alerts".
Andy
Andrew Fried
andrew.fr...@gmail.com
On 6/20/13 3:57 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
> It seems there may be a nee
Your IPs may have been rate limited...
Andy
Andrew Fried
andrew.fr...@gmail.com
On 5/1/13 12:38 PM, Blair Trosper wrote:
> That's all well and good, but I certainly wouldn't expect "nslookup
> gmail.com" or for "nslookup google.com" to return SERVFAIL
>
&
;> 6 144.232.8.209 (144.232.8.209) 187.038 ms 115.363 ms 117.669 ms
A handoff between Verizon and Sprint shouldn't incude a 100ms delay.
Andy
Andrew Fried
andrew.fr...@gmail.com
On 3/6/13 9:25 PM, Min wrote:
> 3 traces all indicated the last hub are 80~100ms faster than the
> secon
indefinitely is actually not a good
thing.
Andy
Andrew Fried
andrew.fr...@gmail.com
On 7/6/12 5:40 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> So... might large and medium ISPs not redirect DNS to those known addresses
> to a resolver in house, which would log the client IPs and let them
> know whom t
The subnets will probably be held until the conclusion of the criminal
trials. After that, the addresses may be held back from assignment for
a while (e.g. a year), but eventually they'll get reassigned.
Andrew Fried
andrew.fr...@gmail.com
On 7/6/12 4:45 PM, Roy wrote:
> On 7/6/2012
27;re coming up with a pretty detailed list of "lesson's learned" from
this operation and being able to implement ideas like yours will
hopefully be considered in advance "next time".
Andy
Andrew Fried
andrew.fr...@gmail.com
On 7/6/12 3:58 PM, Tomas L. Byrnes wrote:
> I
14 hours.
How much more of a graceful ramp down could there have been?
Andy
Andrew Fried
andrew.fr...@gmail.com
On 7/6/12 1:52 PM, Cameron Byrne wrote:
> So insteading of turning the servers off, would it not have been helpful to
> have the servers return a "captive portal"
The dns-ok.us site is getting crushed from all the sudden media
interest. We're trying to tweak it to handle the 50,000 or so
simultaneous connections.
Andy
Andrew Fried
andrew.fr...@gmail.com
On 7/6/12 12:34 PM, Eric J Esslinger wrote:
> A) The DNS changer working group site http:/
We have data going back to November 8, 2011. Generating a report of
over 2,000 ASNs, by day, would be too large an attachment for NANOG.
I'll produce a follow up report in less than 3 hours with data from July
5th. Would that help?
Andy
Andrew Fried
andrew.fr...@gmail.com
On 7/5/12 5:
that these numbers need to come down by Sunday.
if you find this of use, I can regenerate new reports later this
afternoon with data from the 5th.
Andy
--
Andrew Fried
andrew.fr...@gmail.com
dcwg-asns-20120704.txt.bz2
Description: BZip2 compressed data
I suggest you reach out to Shadowserver or Team Cymru if you're a
netblock owner. They can provide daily reports of infected IPs.
Andy
Andrew Fried
andrew.fr...@gmail.com
On 4/26/12 5:50 PM, Leigh Porter wrote:
>
> On 26 Apr 2012, at 22:47, "Andrew Latham"
> mailto:l
The interesting thing is that I'm not seeing any new "hosts" from those
subnets in passive dns. It almost seems that their purpose for
hijacking the space was to direct traffic to themselves, possibly for
collecting login attempts.
Andrew Fried
andrew.fr...@gmail.com
On 1/31/12
).
Doesn't look gmail related from that perspective...
Andrew
Andrew Fried
andrew.fr...@gmail.com
Winn Johnston wrote:
> Issues with gmail.com
>
> here in DC
>
> Winn Johnston
>
> From: u...@3.am [...@3.am]
> Sent: Tuesday, Se
| arin |
2004-07-29 | GBLX Global Crossing Ltd.
4565| 70.86.80.98 | 70.84.0.0/14| US | arin |
2004-07-29 | MEGAPATH2-US - MegaPath Networks Inc.
6461| 70.86.80.98 | 70.84.0.0/14| US | arin |
2004-07-29 | MFNX MFN - Metromedia Fiber Network
--
Andrew
) |
++-+
| 202.104.106.49 | 45 |
| 210.21.218.138 | 48 |
| 63.217.28.226 |1153 |
| 64.57.246.146 |1559 |
| 67.192.144.0 | 11765 |
| 76.9.16.171| 582 |
++-+
--
Andrew Fried
andrew.fr...@gmail.com
84 |
| 206.71.158.30 | 34327 |
| 210.21.218.138 | 84 |
| 63.217.28.226 |2696 |
| 66.230.160.1 |3541 |
| 76.9.16.171|1355 |
++-----+
--
Andrew Fried
andrew.fr...@gmail.com
92 |
+---+-+
--
Andrew Fried
andrew.fr...@gmail.com
David Andersen wrote:
> I'm not sure you're entirely out of the water yet:
>
> 17:13:45.680944 76.9.16.171.53868 > .53: 58451+ NS? . (17)
> 17:13:45.681251 .53 > 76.9.16.171.5
:53 imhotep named[32762]: client 204.11.51.61#43330: view
> ext: query (cache) './NS/IN' denied
> Jan 24 09:43:54 imhotep last message repeated 2 times
> Jan 24 09:53:56 imhotep named[32762]: client 63.217.28.226#53: view
> ext: query (cache) './NS/IN' denied
> Jan 24 10:05:28 imhotep named[32762]: client 208.78.169.234#42517:
> view ext: query (cache) './NS/IN' denied
> Jan 24 10:05:28 imhotep last message repeated 2 times
> Jan 24 10:26:09 imhotep named[32762]: client 206.71.158.30#18971: view
> ext: query (cache) './NS/IN' denied
> Jan 24 10:26:11 imhotep named[32762]: client 206.71.158.30#47622: view
> ext: query (cache) './NS/IN' denied
> Jan 24 10:26:13 imhotep named[32762]: client 206.71.158.30#16077: view
> ext: query (cache) './NS/IN' denied
>
>
>
--
Andrew Fried
andrew.fr...@gmail.com
t 12:19 PM, Rohan Sheth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Name has been suspended for "supposed" abuse by the godaddy abuse team.
>>
>> I believe the only recourse is to email [EMAIL PROTECTED] (cc
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]) asking what they want to release the domain to
>> you. I believe the usual charge is like $75 or so.
>>
>> --Rohan
>>
>>
>
>
>
--
Andrew Fried
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mail being what it is today, testing message delivery is an excellent
idea. I'll implement that feature this weekend.
Andy
Skywing wrote:
> It might be useful to have an option to generate an example alert mail for
> purposes of setting up necessary mail processing rules and that sort. Just a
31 matches
Mail list logo