Re: AT&T Fiber Line / NOT MIS

> > Sent from mobile device.. > > ------ > *From:* Alex Conner > *Sent:* Thursday, June 10, 2021 1:49:27 PM > *To:* TJ Trout > *Cc:* Dennis Burgess ; nanog@nanog.org < > nanog@nanog.org> > *Subject:* Re: AT&T Fiber Line / NOT MIS > >

Re: AT&T Fiber Line / NOT MIS

Bonus points, the small business fiber has extremely limited NAT session limits (depends on hardware, but not greater than 16,000 sessions) and *everything *counts. Cold loading CNN.com (an AT&T company) in a default config without an adblocker will use close to 3000, which will saturate and cause

Re: Survey on the use of IP blacklists for threat mitigation

If we want to go down that rabbit trail, then aren’t we talking about Reputation lists? On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 3:44 PM Harald Koch wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2020, at 15:08, J. Hellenthal via NANOG wrote: > > blacklists are not always deny/block/disallow and conformed of things that > allow you t

Re: is 74.218.84.10 a road runner IP address?

According to Whois that's a commercial roadrunner connection, and it falls in one of their netblocks. Plenty of info here: http://bgp.he.net/ip/74.218.84.10 goe...@anime.net March 3, 2012 9:45 PM ab...@rr.com doesn't seem to think so. -Dan