This is factual. I spend a significant amount of effort ensuring geoip is
accurate for our customers and the proliferation of vendors makes this very
annoying and time consuming when we are onboarding a new block. RFC9632 at
least makes this easier - I definitely recommend doing so if you are not.
infrastructure.
Curious if any other operators in the region saw or felt this netquake?
Alex
ping fix these sorts of
issues. Cogent says they’re ready to turn up more settlement-free ports but
AT&T is not interested in settlement-free. Their solution is for us as a
business to spend thousands of dollars on paid transit from them (AT&T) if
we want better reach to 7018.
They’re kinda
>
> it's there to detect *reachability* failure faster than protocols
> themselves would do so
Exactly this - we have some type 2 fiber transit circuits which are
presumably connected to some sort of re-encoder or something, as we have
had a few scenarios where the router at the far-remote end di
up commercially off list.
Thanks yall! Happy new year.
Alex
One country whose internet resources are nominally controlled by a RIR
that's located in an enemy jurisdiction is Russia.
The Netherlands could not physically invade Russia to disconnect its
servers or routers, but it could easily require the invalidation of
Russian internet resources since RIPE
Haven't we seen this pattern enough times?
1. some organization maintains some database with some data
2. someone asks what if the government forces it to falsify/censor data
3. someone says it would ruin trust and nobody would use the database
any more
4. government forces organization to fals
Appreciate all the input everyone! It's helpful
Suresh - great pointer - it looks like they do. I didn't even notice it as
an option. I think this will be the fastest/easiest method for me in
webmail-land. Thanks for pointing that out!
*Alex Buie*Senior Cloud Operations Engineer
4
s what workflow/process any of you use to do so, and what the
best/netizen-polite way is to end up with a reply that's appropriately
threaded. Do I just need to mirror the subject line?
*Alex Buie*Senior Cloud Operations Engineer
450 Century Pkwy # 100 Allen, TX 75013
<https://maps.google.
d be
landing 10g optics from the carriers currently and peering to the
downstream switches at 40G or 100G. (frequently we are in the used
equipment space for our acquisitions so previous generation or two or three
tends to land us in a pretty good spot).
thanks in advance for any advice you can provide!
Alex
> Kind regards,
>
> Job
Hi Steve,
Another monitored, production-grade service provided by the RIPE NCC, based on
their Routinator instance, is available here:
https://rpki-validator.ripe.net/json
Other output formats are available as well; a description of each is available
here:
https://routinator.docs.nlnetlabs.nl/en/stable/output-formats.html
Cheers,
Alex
Hey folks,
Someone forwarded this directly to my inbox, much appreciated. We’ll work with
Martin to get this sorted out.
--
Alex Brotman
Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy
Comcast
From: NANOG On Behalf Of
Martin Cook
Sent: Friday, June 7, 2024 2:15 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sub
d or seen this? We're working through our channels
with the carrier but the latency profile is such that it seems likely it
may be affecting others as well and I wanted to ask the group. Any
incidents that anyone is aware of which may be related?
Thanks,
*Alex Buie*Senior Cloud Operations Engi
– and for ironing out a
small bump yesterday together with NIC.br after the switch-over.
Cheers,
Alex
> On 15 Apr 2024, at 16:24, Carlos Martinez-Cagnazzo
> wrote:
>
> Hi all, it's me again.
>
> The switch is complete. Thank you all for your patience.
>
> /Car
list.
--
Alex Brotman
Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy
Comcast
> -Original Message-
> From: NANOG
> On Behalf Of Marco Davids (Private) via NANOG
> Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2024 8:03 AM
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: IPv6 connectivity to mx[1-4].smtp.goo
, Inbound IPv6 is
about 5% of traffic. Outbound IPv6 is about 40% of traffic. I’m not sharing
mail submissions from users as many (nearly all?) of our users have IPv6 and
that would skew the numbers, and may not be relevant to this discussion.
--
Alex Brotman
Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messa
t least in my situation.
Try giving your money to someone who runs BGP with just its default settings
and no policies, see how well that works out.
Cheers,
Alex
> Regards,
> Bill Herrin
>
> --
> William Herrin
> b...@herrin.us
> https://bill.herrin.us/
red route".
You're not the first to wish for this:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-dickson-idr-last-resort-05
Alex
> On Jan 23, 2024, at 00:43, William Herrin wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2024 at 3:34 PM Alex Le Heux wrote:
>> This is perfectly reasonable routing _if you're 3356_
>>
>> In this profit-driven world, expecting 3356 to do something that's
>> unpro
add 3356:70 to your route is another. Have you asked them? I know
I would look into it if a customer comes to me with a similar request.
Alex
monitoring for protecting against
this sort of failure.
Thanks in advance for any insight and time.
*Alex Buie*Senior Cloud Operations Engineer
450 Century Pkwy # 100 Allen, TX 75013
<https://maps.google.com/?q=450+Century+Pkwy+STE+100+%7C+Allen,+TX+%7C+75013&entry=gmail&source=g>
D
keep it updated.
Cheers,
Alex
[1] https://rpki.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ops/tools.html#relying-party-software
> On 14 Jun 2023, at 18:43, Carlos Friaças wrote:
>
>
> Greetings,
>
> My issue seems to be solved.
>
> It seems the Afrinic glitch is incompatible with the
ere:
https://routinator.do.nlnetlabs.nl/log
It all still works without any extra configuration in Routinator.
Cheers,
Alex
> On 14 Jun 2023, at 15:15, Carlos Friaças via NANOG wrote:
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> Did this issue resurface some days ago...?
> I had nearly 6000 ROAs on June 1st.
Thank you for the tips so far. It was mentioned to me off-list this might
be more helpful with our AS and relevant ranges, so including them here in
case that's helpful. Sorry for not including them originally!
AS: 396163
69.194.4.0/23
104.225.212.0/23
*Alex Buie*Senior Cloud Opera
ave any
tips, or recognize what WAF/engine they're using from the page layout
with UUID at the bottom to help me identify who else I might try
contacting to see about getting recategorized, I would really
appreciate hearing from you.
Thanks a bunch!
Alex Buie
Senior Cloud Operations Engineer
450 Century Pkwy # 100 Allen, TX 75013
D: 469-884-0225 | www.cytracom.com
up with Krill:
https://blog.nlnetlabs.nl/running-krill-under-arin/
RIPE NCC and APNIC offer RPKI publication services as well, and there are
similar guides for these RIRs:
https://blog.nlnetlabs.nl/running-krill-under-ripe-ncc/
https://blog.nlnetlabs.nl/running-krill-under-apnic/
Cheers,
Alex
oduct' and a 'commercial activity' is key for
this discussion.
Please get in touch with us if you have concerns or this affects you. Maarten
Aertsen is spearheading this initiative.
Kind regards,
Alex Band
NLnet Labs
0-rc1/
Kind regards,
Alex
> On 17 Oct 2022, at 10:26, Alex Band wrote:
>
> Thanks a lot for your overview Christopher. We’re very happy that ARIN is
> working to address the concerns expressed by the community about the Relying
> Party Agreement and TAL distribution.
&
Creating ROAs for *all* the announcements that are done with your prefixes,
both on your own AS and the ones announced by AWS, is probably the best way
forward from both a routing security and ease-of-management perspective.
-Alex
> On 28 Oct 2022, at 17:00, Samuel Jackson wrote:
>
&
)
https://routinator--796.org.readthedocs.build/en/796/configuration.html
(documentation)
We hope ARIN will be able to clarify the current RPA text to address your third
paragraph, so that we are in a position to release Routinator with one fewer
hurdle to adoption.
Kind regards,
Alex
[1
wonder why it’s not better. There is plenty
of inspiration to take from the other RIRs.
-Alex
>
>
>> On Sep 18, 2022, at 11:38 , Alex Band wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 18 Sep 2022, at 20:17, Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
t/benefit of doing RPKI in the ARIN region
compared to the rest of the world, e.g. ticketed requests to set it up, no
indication of what the effect of your ROA is going to be before you publish,
handling ROA expiry manually, etc.
In other regions using RPKI is orders of magnitude simpler to set up and
maintain, and a lot less error prone. They provide alerting when your ROA do
not seem to match what is seen in BGP, create matching route: objects, etc.
To illustrate, here’s a video of the RIPE NCC management UI from 2015 (!):
https://youtu.be/gLwHp12wOGw
(And no, the nonrepudiation requirement in ARIN is not an excuse)
-Alex
>
> YMMV
>
> Owen
>
ips-and-asns/resource-management/rpki/resource-certification-rpki-for-provider-independent-end-users
-Alex
>
> Owen
>
>
>> On Sep 15, 2022, at 15:55 , Rubens Kuhl wrote:
>>
>> You could try suggesting IANA/PTI/ICANN to have a different RPKI trust
>>
.
Regards,
-Alex
> On 16 Sep 2022, at 17:53, John Curran wrote:
>
> Tom -
>
> It’s an artifact of our formation that we are presently providing services to
> any customers absent any agreement
> and while ARIN continues to do so (by providing basic services to legacy
&
Michael,
Please contact me off-list and I'll see if I can be of any help.
--
Alex Brotman
Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy
Comcast
> -Original Message-
> From: NANOG On
> Behalf Of Michael Brown
> Sent: Monday, August 22, 2022 4:18 PM
> To: North Am
> On 13 Apr 2022, at 13:47, John Curran wrote:
>
>>
>> On 13 Apr 2022, at 5:16 AM, Alex Band wrote:
>>
>> In case people would like to compare notes to the way this is arranged in
>> the RIPE NCC service region, here is the Resource Certification for n
,
without having access to any other options.
-Alex
> On 13 Apr 2022, at 06:56, John Curran wrote:
>
>>
>> On 12 Apr 2022, at 11:38 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
>>
>> On 4/6/22 10:55 AM, John Curran wrote:
>>> Interesting philosophy - historically ARIN customer
https://spa.xfinity.com should have a form to request removal. Note they say
resolution time can be up to three business days
--
Alex Brotman
Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy
Comcast
From: NANOG On Behalf Of
Jason Kuehl
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2021 10:31 AM
To: NANOG
Sub
Ipv4.global is very reliable. I’ve sold blocks there
On Thu, Aug 5, 2021 at 1:28 AM james jones wrote:
> hey everyone,
>
> Been a while since I had to deal with NetOps stuff. Was wondering, where
> do you go these days to get IPv4 blocks? It seems like getting assignments
> is hard due to exhaus
/issues
Cheers,
Alex
[1] https://rpki-validator.ripe.net/bgp-preview
es. But I don't want to
get cocky. We got SDN :-)
Alex.
בתאריך יום ה׳, 24 ביוני 2021, 17:44, מאת Michael Thomas :
>
> Not exactly network but maybe, but certainly operational. Shouldn't this
> just be handled like disaster recovery? I haven't looked into this much,
>
>
> Sent from mobile device..
>
> --
> *From:* Alex Conner
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 10, 2021 1:49:27 PM
> *To:* TJ Trout
> *Cc:* Dennis Burgess ; nanog@nanog.org <
> nanog@nanog.org>
> *Subject:* Re: AT&T Fiber Line / NOT MIS
>
>
Bonus points, the small business fiber has extremely limited NAT session
limits (depends on hardware, but not greater than 16,000 sessions) and
*everything *counts. Cold loading CNN.com (an AT&T company) in a default
config without an adblocker will use close to 3000, which will saturate and
cause
Nathanael,
You can reach out to me privately if you'd like. Typically those are related
to DNS being unable to resolve an MX/A/ for your 5321 Mail From domain, but
I can take a better look to be sure.
--
Alex Brotman
Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy
Comcast
> -
If you are willing to pay, hetrixtools is an option.
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 12:26 PM vom513 wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I’ve seen other folks asking the same/similar question in the past, but I
> don’t recall seeing more than a few options out there to *try* to suss this
> out. Use case is someone
r find out if it actually does in a time of crisis.
Kind regards,
-Alex
> On 31 Oct 2020, at 07:17, Tony Tauber wrote:
>
> As I've pointed out to Randy and others and I'll share here.
> We planned, but hadn't yet upgraded our Routinator RP (Relying Party)
> s
the core values that make it possible for a
not-for-profit foundation like ours to make free, liberally licensed open
source software.
We’re proud of what we’ve been able to achieve and look forward to a continued
open discussion with the community.
Respectfully,
Alex
ack to rsync when RRDP is unavailable is not a
requirement specified in any RFC, as the paper seems to suggest. In fact, we
argue that it's actually a bad idea to do so:
https://blog.nlnetlabs.nl/why-routinator-doesnt-fall-back-to-rsync/
We're interested to hear views on this from both an operational and security
perspective.
-Alex
If you send me a message off-list, I’ll see if I can get it routed to the
proper team. Thanks
--
Alex Brotman
Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy
Comcast
From: NANOG On Behalf Of
Octolus Development via NANOG
Sent: Friday, September 4, 2020 5:24 PM
To: Mikael Abrahamsson via N
Hi Fabiano,
> On 26 Aug 2020, at 11:03, Fabiano D'Agostino
> wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
> thank you. I read that documentation and I was reading this one from page 201:
> https://www.ripe.net/support/training/material/bgp-operations-and-security-training-course/BGP-Slides-
Perhaps this clarifies things:
https://rpki.readthedocs.io/en/latest/rpki/introduction.html#mapping-the-resource-allocation-hierarchy-into-the-rpki
As well as this section:
https://rpki.readthedocs.io/en/latest/rpki/securing-bgp.html
Cheers,
Alex
> On 26 Aug 2020, at 10:25, Fabi
sions or any details you
> can share please,
According to the information I received from the community[1], you should read
PR1461602 and PR1309944 before deploying.
-Alex
[1] https://rpki.readthedocs.io/en/latest/rpki/router-support.html
-NCC/rpki-validator-3/pull/215
RPA grief aside, ARIN seems to be the only RIR that publishes the latest
version of their TAL clearly and correctly:
https://www.arin.net/resources/manage/rpki/tal/
-Alex
> On 2 Aug 2020, at 20:52, Randy Bush wrote:
>
> so i was trying to ensure i had
to get it bootstrapped.
Alex
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 12:39 PM Lyden, John C wrote:
> Hey gang.
>
>
>
> We’re setting up a unified wireless network for the students here, and to
> get around the issues with Nintendo and NAT we devoted a large chunk of
> public IP space to them.
&
published elsewhere. Perhaps BGP Alerter is a solution for you:
https://github.com/nttgin/BGPalerter
Cheers,
Alex
> -Adam
>
> Adam Thompson
> Consultant, Infrastructure Services
>
> 100 - 135 Innovation Drive
> Winnipeg, MB, R3T 6A8
> (204) 977-6824 or 1-800-430-6
best practices and lessons learned over
the last 10 years and monitor them in ways never before possible, such as
through Prometheus.
Blog post with details:
http://link.medium.com/1SsTJSAvB7
All the best,
Alex
If we want to go down that rabbit trail, then aren’t we talking about
Reputation lists?
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 3:44 PM Harald Koch wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020, at 15:08, J. Hellenthal via NANOG wrote:
>
> blacklists are not always deny/block/disallow and conformed of things that
> allow you t
use it’s not on their systems. Evil RIR
could only revoke a prefix from your certificate or your entire certificate,
but again, your BGP announcements would fall back to NotFound and would be
accepted.
-Alex
nt in setting up filters
if there’s no data to filter on. One could argue that with filtering an
incentive arises to create ROAs, but this is not how things have evolved
elsewhere in the world.
-Alex
[1] https://nlnetlabs.nl/projects/rpki/rpki-analytics/
rsion 0.6, due next week.
-Alex
> On 25 Feb 2020, at 13:40, Alex Band wrote:
>
> An update:
>
> The setup process with ARIN has now been fixed in Krill 0.5.0, which was just
> released:
> https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/news/2020/Feb/25/krill.0.5.0-released/
>
> We
flipped. While invalids are
now being dropped more and more, ROA coverage is currently only at 7% in the US
and 2.5% in Canada. Accuracy is at around 95%, so that’s great.
https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/projects/rpki/rpki-analytics/
Please create ROAs!
-Alex
> On 26 Mar 2020, at 01:50, Job Snijd
Hi Eric,
I try to cover every aspect of RPKI on https://rpki.readthedocs.io.
It also covers the basics of IP address allocation, how IRR fits into the
ecosystem and provides an overview of all the tooling that is available for
RPKI.
Cheers,
Alex
> On 5 Mar 2020, at 02:21, Eric C. Mil
works with every RIR implementation.
Looking forward to your feedback on this release.
Cheers,
Alex
> On 13 Feb 2020, at 09:48, Alex Band wrote:
>
> Hi there!
>
> There is also this somewhat hacky SED command to transform the Request XML
> into the format that ARIN accepts, in
re to include in our future RPKI improvements”?
In the mean time I have added a warning to the documentation:
https://rpki.readthedocs.io/en/latest/krill/manage-cas.html#step-1-get-the-request-xml-file
Thanks!
-Alex
> On 5 Feb 2020, at 16:48, Tim Bruijnzeels wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Ev
Yes, lots of our key wireless network timing elements reported GPS
timing sync failure during the past two hours.
Appears to be resolving now, within the past few minutes.
On 12/31/2019 02:08 PM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
Is anyone else seeing GPS timing source outages across the U. S. In the last
to see how this evolves over the next few months, as it
changes the mostly Hosted RPKI landscape we’ve seen over the last 8 years.
-Alex
> On 3 Dec 2019, at 17:08, Job Snijders wrote:
>
> Dear fellow network operators,
>
> It appears Santa brought presents early this year! I
Hi Tomas,
Last time I spoke with them, I just contacted their NOC. They were pretty
responsive.
n...@inap.com<mailto:n...@inap.com>
[cid:image001.png@01D5B19F.475C37C0]
Alex Lembesis
Sr. Network Engineer – Global ITO
Tel: +1 (267) 468-4230 Cell: +1 (215)
272-6638
alex
> >
> >
> https://support.hpe.com/hpsc/doc/public/display?docId=emr_na-a00092491en_us
> >
>
>
--
*Alex Buie*
Technical Support Expert, Level 3 - Networking
Datto, Inc.
475-288-4550 (o)
585-653-8779 (c)
www.datto.com
<http://www.datto.com/support-sig/>
Join the c
hat they
actually do with them though.
Alex
Was able to get in touch with someone. Thank you guys!
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Alex Lembesis
(External)
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2019 4:52 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Internap (AS 12178) Contact
Wondering if anyone knows of a contact @ Internap that can
Wondering if anyone knows of a contact @ Internap that can reach out to me
off-list. We're only receiving a default route from them now, when we should
be receiving the full table. Any help is much appreciated. Thanks!
This message is intended solely for the designated recipient(s). It may c
For further community-driven RPKI information there is:
https://rpki.readthedocs.io/
Along with an FAQ:
https://rpki.readthedocs.io/en/latest/about/faq.html
Cheers,
-Alex
> On 25 Jun 2019, at 17:55, BATTLES, TIM wrote:
>
> https://www.nccoe.nist.gov/projects/building-blocks/sec
We deploy routers with Verizon LTE failover - for full functionality, make
sure your MTU is 1428 or less, per their specifications.
Here's an example doc from Spirent that talks about it.
https://support.spirent.com/SC_KnowledgeView?Id=FAQ14556
Alex
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019, 7:51 AM Dovid B
lizing
> ARIN's hosted model, but down the road ARIN's delegated model will be
> in our future.
>
> https://www.arin.net/resources/rpki/using_rpki.html
What are your main drivers for wanting to move to the delegated model?
Cheers!
-Alex
Sphinx documentation
tooling, we welcome corrections, additions, readability improvements and even
translations.
Feel free to create an issue or pull request on GitHub.
Hope this is useful! See y’all in S.F.
Cheers,
Martin, Tim & Alex
The NLnet Labs RPKI Team
[0] https://github.com/NLnet
ch as
NSD and Unbound.
Happy to keep you updated on the progress.
Cheers,
Alex Band
NLnet Labs
> On 23 Nov 2018, at 18:51, Jeff McAdams wrote:
>
> OK, I'm trying to do the responsible thing and further the progress and
> deployment of RPKI. I feel like I have a pretty
for getting this off the ground.
Cheers,
Alex
+ enterprise users in the
financial space and have tried everything but all roads lead to automated
systems.
Can anyone please reach out with a contact if you have one?
Sorry to spam this list if this is inappropriate content. Very desperate here.
Thank you,
Alex Osipov / CTO
environments. Going forward, we’ll be
focussing on monitoring for the next release.
You can find the source code and further details on Github:
https://github.com/NLnetLabs/routinator
Cheers,
Alex Band
NLnet Labs
be aware of the impact of such an outage when considering
questions of liability.
Kind regards,
Alex Band
NLnet Labs
> On 1 Oct 2018, at 01:21, John Curran wrote:
>
> Folks -
>
> Perhaps it would be helpful to confirm that we have common goals in the
> network operator c
this process shouldn’t have to take several tickets and several days.
Be that as it may, we fully intend to build a Delegated CA that is on par with
RIPE’s user experience so that operators can run RPKI themselves in a usable
way.
Alex Band
NLnet Labs
offer a toolset that on par with our other projects such as
NSD and Unbound, in terms of quality, feature set and update frequency. We’re
looking forward to your feedback; in the mean time we’re getting started with
the CA and Publication Server.
Cheers,
Alex
Solarwinds IPAM is our choice primarily since we use their other
suites/modules already
On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 16:50 Mike Lyon wrote:
> Title says it all... Currently using IPPlan, but it is kinda antiquated..
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
>
> --
> Mike Lyon
> mike.l...@gmail.com
> http://www.linkedin.com
aw off the floor after they tell you the
price.
Alex
Axiom
Used variety of their sfps, twinax cables etc.
Been rock solid
On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 14:42 Ryugo Kikuchi wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Does anyone have a recommended model of 3rd party's "QSFP-100G-LR4-S" for
> Cisco ASR and Nexus?
>
> Cisco's original 100G SFP costs us an arm and a leg, so we w
Does anyone have a contact @ Internap that could help me off list? Our peering
with them is down. Any help is appreciated, thanks!
This message is intended solely for the designated recipient(s). It may contain
confidential or proprietary information and may be subject to attorney-client
priv
Correct, Luke.
Best regards,
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Luke Guillory (External) [mailto:lguill...@reservetele.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2018 12:37 PM
To: Alex Lembesis; Job Snijders (External); Youssef Bengelloun-Zahr
Cc: NANOG
Subject: RE: How are you configuring BFD
To speed up BGP routing convergence. The (2x) dark fiber links from PA to FL
are being used as Layer3 datacenter interconnects, where each datacenter has
its own AS. The DF is also carrying FCIP traffic, so we need failover to be as
fast as possible.
Best regards,
Alex
-Original
Using 250ms x 3 on fiber connecting Pennsylvania to Florida...
Best regards,
Alex
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Jason Lixfeld
(External)
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2018 9:10 AM
To: NANOG
Subject: How are you configuring BFD timers?
Hey
Netflow Auditor
In-house solution. The interface takes some getting used to, but you can pull
a-n-y-t-h-i-n-g from it. Easy setup, great support, highly scalable, priced
well.
Best regards,
-Alex
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of
pport for SNMP Traps
• Support for port mirroring
• Configuration rollback feature is desirable
• POE (IEEE 802.3af) is desirable, but not mandatory.
Thanks,
Alex
I'd be interested in applications around ownership of IP space or ASNs, but
there's so many ways to skin that cat already that people don't do because
it's 'hard' or 'reduces our flexibility' or sometimes because it involves
hardware upgrades as Christopher Morrow pointed out with RPKI and BGPsec.
You can find a detailed announcement from the RIPE NCC here:
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/dns-wg/2017-March/003394.html
<https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/dns-wg/2017-March/003394.html>
-Alex Band
> On 17 Mar 2017, at 12:31, John Curran wrote:
>
> Eygene -
>
There is the Giiro:
http://pop-ba.rnp.br/GTGIIRO
Despite the content is in Brazilian Portuguese, it may work well to use Google
Translator to read the overview.
The software developed was funded by the Brazilian NREN. The software is
maintained by a team of research and development.
Alex
Hi Nagarjun,
You can find some statistics on adoption, coverage and quality here:
http://certification-stats.ripe.net
https://lirportal.ripe.net/certification/content/static/statistics/world-roas.html
http://rpki.surfnet.nl
All the best,
Alex Band
> On 20 Feb 2017, at 06:52, Nagar
There is also http://speedof.me/ tool around for a while as well as:
https://sourceforge.net/speedtest/
http://www.bandwidthplace.com/
http://testmy.net/
I've got a good result of 880Mbps[1] from fast.com from 6 hops away
(~9ms)[2]:
[1] http://pasteboard.co/6xAnRRa6F.png
[2] http://pasteboard.c
To be fair, he was getting the service for free. I wouldn’t really call
that a paying customer. Still not great from a PR standpoint though.
--
Alex Wacker
On September 23, 2016 at 2:00:10 PM, Grant Ridder (shortdudey...@gmail.com)
wrote:
Didn't realize Akamai kicked out or disabled cust
Would appreciate if someone who manages or provides support for google apps
could contact me off list.
--
Alex Wacker
s a lot of stuff about email and email spam (including a whole
page on FBLs at https://www.m3aawg.org/fbl-resources), but there is
some stuff there on abuse in other domains as well. It's well worth a
gander.
HTH,
Alex
Issue is supposedly resolved. Please test :)
On Jun 14, 2016 7:33 PM, "Kraig Beahn" wrote:
> Thanks Alex and Allen,
>
> All of the devices tested on our side have Florida NPA/NXX's, including
> data only devices, which is more than likely the reason we are seeing
&g
1 - 100 of 451 matches
Mail list logo
