Hello everyone,
Huge Networks is looking for 100G L2 service between Equinix Ashburn (or
NYC Metro area) to any datacenter in the London or Frankfurt Metro Area.
Please contact me offline if you offer this type of service.
--
Erick Nascimento
Contact: +55 11 3090-4441 | +55 11 94775-9570
Av
I would caution anyone running MACsec on a link leveraging a provider
circuit between them to quadruple check that the provider link supports
customer use of MACsec. In theory MACsec will operate just fine over a
Layer 2 link but carriers tend to not like unanticipated bits get appended
or inserted
On 10/22/24 16:56, Tarko Tikan wrote:
What we are seeing now is MACsec getting integrated into latest NPUs
directly. So far it has been mostly implemented by separate chips or
in PHYs (or combination). This has, in some cases, limited you to what
ports you can use MACsec on. It also had ch
If you are going to deploy MACSEC, my advice is test, test, and test,
especially (but not only) if you have different vendors'
implementations of MACSEC on either end of the link.
Test that MACSEC comes up.
Test that it recovers from link flaps.
Test key rotation.
Test recovery from link flaps
hey,
It is not exactly new technology, these devices have existed for +decade now?
What we are seeing now is MACsec getting integrated into latest NPUs
directly. So far it has been mostly implemented by separate chips or in
PHYs (or combination). This has, in some cases, limited you to what
On 10/22/24 00:12, Crist Clark wrote:
It is definitely deployed out there. I wouldn't worry too much about
reading the specs. All of the implementations I've dealt with are only
partial implementations. They almost all are limited to "point to point"
functionality.
As for comparing to IPsec,
6 matches
Mail list logo
