Hi Lancheng and Mike,
This is TsungYi, the AS7480 operator. I will look into this issue and
share the reason here shortly.
Thank you!
Best regards,
TsungYi Yu
AS7480
On Sun, Sep 15, 2024 at 4:20 AM Lancheng via NANOG wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> >Hurricane Electric now uses ASPA to do hop by hop ch
On 2024-09-10 13:27, Jon Lewis wrote:
Are you aware of whether or not Xfinity is doing CGNAT for either of you?
Googling, I get conflicting results, some saying they use CGNAT, some saying
they
don't. If they do,
I wonder if their CGNAT routers have SIP ALG enabled or
disabled. Unfortunatel
Hi Mike,>Hurricane Electric now uses ASPA to do hop by hop checking of AS paths
>when deciding which routes to accept when building prefix filters.
>Here is an example of a route failing the ASPA check.
>44.31.69.0/24,rejected,AS path 4635 9002 945 7480 38254 38254 38254
>38254 38254 ASPA recor
On 9/14/24 9:04 AM, Brandon Martin wrote:
On 9/13/24 11:20, Michael Thomas wrote:
On 9/13/24 7:19 AM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
Yes. We run lots of SIP UDP over many networks without issue. I
feel like bloat is exactly an application for using UDP?
With TCP won't that cause more bloat/delay? T
On 9/13/24 11:20, Michael Thomas wrote:
On 9/13/24 7:19 AM, Matt Hoppes wrote:
Yes. We run lots of SIP UDP over many networks without issue. I
feel like bloat is exactly an application for using UDP?
With TCP won't that cause more bloat/delay? That being said, we
generally see about 3-6 m
5 matches
Mail list logo
